gmane.ietf.impp archive

385 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

IPR Disclosure: "Angosso*"'s Statement about IPR related to RFC 3339
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:53:17 -0700
IETF Secretariat <[email protected]> • #846
Please confirm (conf#13c4e916c510d6eee0ebbc82d2720924)
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 04:47:44 -0500 (CDT)
"Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> • #845
RE: RFC 3861, SRV handling
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:12:42 -0700
Joe Hildebrand <[email protected]> • #844
Re: RFC 3861, SRV handling
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:04:37 -0800
Justin Karneges <[email protected]> • #843
RE: RFC 3861, SRV handling
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:21:00 -0700
Joe Hildebrand <[email protected]> • #842
RFC 3861, SRV handling
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:30:43 -0800
Justin Karneges <[email protected]> • #841
WG Action: Conclusion of Instant Messaging and Presence Protocol (impp)
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:10:07 -0400
The IESG <[email protected]> • #840
RFC 3863 on Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:26:31 -0700
[email protected] • #839
RFC 3862 on Common Presence and Instant Messaging (CPIM): Message Format
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:24:52 -0700
[email protected] • #838
RFC 3861 on Address Resolution for Instant Messaging and Presence
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:23:16 -0700
[email protected] • #837
RFC 3859 on Common Profile for Presence (CPP)
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:20:09 -0700
[email protected] • #836
RFC 3860 on Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM)
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:21:37 -0700
[email protected] • #835
Re:
Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:17:20 -0500
"Suga" <[email protected]> • #834
Re: Document
Sat, 22 May 2004 15:57:40 +0530
"Derek" <[email protected]> • #833
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:"Mail Delivery (failure [email protected])
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:40:48 -0500
[email protected] • #831
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:"hi
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:30:14 +0800
[email protected] • #828
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:"test
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:59:17 +0200
[email protected] • #827
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:"Hi
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:07:20 +0700
[email protected] • #826
Re: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:im
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:02:36 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #825
RE: ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:im
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:52:17 -0600
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #824
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:im
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:40:05 -0600
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> • #823
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" don't be late! otaomqvm
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:46:14 -0600
[email protected] • #821
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" don't be late! loalibwi
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:03:32 -0600
[email protected] • #820
unscribe
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Edward Wang <[email protected]> • #819
Unsubscribe [email protected]
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:49:43 -0800
"Lisa Guo" <[email protected]> • #817
Unsubscribe [email protected]
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:10:07 -0500
[email protected] • #816
Unsubscribe [email protected]
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:01:39 +0100
[email protected] • #815
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" don't be late! imriaoba
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:41:41 -0600
[email protected] • #813
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" don't be late! uozuwfkw
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:08:50 -0600
[email protected] • #812
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" don't be late! cihckosk
Sat, 8 Nov 2003 23:41:28 -0600
[email protected] • #811
Remove
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 05:57:35 -0500
Bill Downey <[email protected]> • #810
My unsubscription to the IETF IMPP discussion forum
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:09:37 +0100
[email protected] • #809
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" don't be late! ypaynahn
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:36:20 -0600
[email protected] • #808
No meeting in Minneapolis after all
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:01:03 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #807
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-srv-04.txt
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:28:05 -0400
[email protected] • #806
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-pres-04.txt
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:28:49 -0400
[email protected] • #805
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-im-04.txt
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:28:29 -0400
[email protected] • #804
Re: Fixing documents and proposed agenda for Minneapolis
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:05:37 +0100
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #803
Re: Fixing documents and proposed agenda for Minneapolis
Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:59:44 +0100
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #802
Fixing documents and proposed agenda for Minneapolis
Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:15:20 -0400
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #801
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Thank you!
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:03:39 --0700
<[email protected]> • #800
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: That movie
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 9:20:42 --0700
<[email protected]> • #799
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Re: My details
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:42:16 --0700
<[email protected]> • #798
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Thank you!
Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:26:29 --0700
<[email protected]> • #797
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: That movie
Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:03:15 --0700
<[email protected]> • #796
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:41:49 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #795
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Details
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:30:03 --0700
<[email protected]> • #794
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Details
Sat, 30 Aug 2003 8:03:31 --0500
<[email protected]> • #793
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Details
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:13:14 --0700
<[email protected]> • #792
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: That movie
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:16:30 +0200
<[email protected]> • #791
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Details
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:33:05 +0200
<[email protected]> • #790
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Thank you!
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:46:43 +0200
<[email protected]> • #789
mail sent using my email address not from me
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:26:43 -0700
"Carr, Wayne" <[email protected]> • #788
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Wicked screensaver
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:00:26 --0700
<[email protected]> • #787
"Virus detected and cleaned; was:" Re: Wicked screensaver
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:41:36 --0700
<[email protected]> • #786
Re: CPIM insufficient for end-to-end security?
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:15:36 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #785
Re: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:50:03 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #784
CPIM insufficient for end-to-end security?
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:40:49 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #783
Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard)
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:45:27 -0700
Marshall Rose <[email protected]> • #782
Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard)
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:26:52 +0200
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> • #780
Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard)
Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:19:59 -0700
Marshall Rose <[email protected]> • #779
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:41:56 -0600 (MDT)
"Ben Schumacher" <[email protected]> • #778
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:51:08 -0400
"Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> • #777
Re: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:39:06 +0100
"Shane Dempsey" <[email protected]> • #776
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:39:07 -0400
"Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> • #775
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:08:22 -0600
Joe Hildebrand <[email protected]> • #774
Re: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:27:24 -0400
"Federico Lucifredi" <[email protected]> • #773
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:48:46 -0400
"Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> • #772
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:10:59 +0300
<[email protected]> • #771
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:01:45 -0400
"Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> • #770
Re: Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard)
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:09:45 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #769
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:50:55 -0400
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #768
Response from a former IMPP Chair (Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard)
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:18:57 +0200
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> • #767
Re: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:06:20 +0100
"Shane Dempsey" <[email protected]> • #766
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:53:52 -0400
"Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> • #765
Re: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:38:32 +0100
"Shane Dempsey" <[email protected]> • #764
RE: Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:44:26 -0400
"Bob Wyman" <[email protected]> • #763
Let's fix THE PROBLEM
Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:08:54 -0400
"Rob Batchelder" <[email protected]> • #762
Re: Dave Crocker's & Marshall Rose's message
Fri, 04 Jul 2003 09:15:02 +0200
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> • #761
RE: Dave Crocker's & Marshall Rose's message
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:08:23 -0400
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #760
Re: Dave Crocker's & Marshall Rose's message
03 Jul 2003 12:51:05 -0400
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #759
Re: Dave Crocker's & Marshall Rose's message
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:36:08 +0200
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #758
Dave Crocker's & Marshall Rose's message
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:25:32 -0400
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #757
Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:09:53 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]>, Marshall Rose <[email protected]> • #756
Re: who
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:17:59 -0400
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #755
who
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 03:18:49 -0400
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #754
Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:20:06 -0700
Marshall Rose <[email protected]> • #753
Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:05:14 -0700
[email protected] • #752
Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:37:50 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]>, Marshall Rose <[email protected]> • #751
Re: Requests on "de facto charter" discussion
Tue, 27 May 2003 15:26:08 -0600
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #750
RE: Requests on "de facto charter" discussion
Tue, 27 May 2003 15:05:31 -0400
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #749
Re: Requests on "de facto charter" discussion
Tue, 27 May 2003 11:11:51 -0600
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #748
RE: Requests on "de facto charter" discussion
Mon, 26 May 2003 16:48:26 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #747
Requests on "de facto charter" discussion
Mon, 26 May 2003 13:55:28 -0400
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #746
Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
26 May 2003 10:52:13 -0400
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #745
Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
Mon, 26 May 2003 07:09:16 -0700
Marshall Rose <[email protected]> • #744
RE: "De facto charter" proposed text
Mon, 26 May 2003 11:35:23 +0530
"sivaram" <[email protected]> • #743
Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 17:29:23 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #742
Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 17:06:27 -0700
"ccallen" <[email protected]> • #741
RE: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 18:17:50 -0400
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #740
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.