gmane.ietf.pop3ext archive

131 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:43:09 -0500
Dave Aronson <[email protected]> • #143
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:30:46 -0800
[email protected] (WJCarpenter) • #142
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Mark Crispin <[email protected]> • #141
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:00:01 -0500
Marc Blanchet <[email protected]> • #140
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:10:55 -0800 (PST)
Mark Crispin <[email protected]> • #139
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:37:21 -0600
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #138
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:44:03 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #137
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:52:22 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #136
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:41:11 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #135
FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Sun, 26 Oct 2003 20:55:08 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #134
I-D ACTION:draft-siemborski-rfc1734bis-00.txt
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:38:36 -0400
[email protected] • #133
RE: Is there are replacement for 'UIDL'?
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:22:23 +0000
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #132
Re: Is there are replacement for 'UIDL'?
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:51:48 -0800
Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]> • #131
RE: Is there are replacement for 'UIDL'?
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:31:29 -0800
"Jeff Stephenson" <[email protected]> • #130
Is there are replacement for 'UIDL'?
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:31:12 +0000
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #129
Re: Problem with AUTH response from MSN
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:59:06 -0700
Chris Newman <[email protected]> • #128
Problem with AUTH response from MSN
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:09:26 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #127
Business/Employment Opportunity
Tue, 8 May 2001 23:52:06 -1000
"Mitchell" <[email protected]> • #126
I need a POP3 mailbox...
Sun, 06 May 2001 16:20:13 -0700
[email protected] • #125
Virus in 'Branca de Neve porn?!' mail on list
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:24:23 +0200
St?phane LOEUILLET <[email protected]> • #124
toner supplies
Wed, 28 Mar 01 02:33:16 EST
[email protected] • #122
toner supplies
Sun, 11 Feb 01 03:43:18 EST
[email protected] • #121
Re: Announcement of MailConnect 6
Fri, 12 May 2000 21:58:38 -0700
Randall Gellens <[email protected]> • #119
RE: A suggestion for RFC1939
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 09:11:15 -0800
Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]> • #118
RE: A suggestion for RFC1939
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:32:21 +0530
Faheem Ahmed Khan <[email protected]> • #117
Re: A suggestion for RFC1939
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 23:16:04 +0300 (MSK)
Solar Designer <[email protected]> • #116
Re: A suggestion for RFC1939
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:43:42 -0800
Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]> • #115
Re: A suggestion for RFC1939
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:19:06 +0000
Paul Overell <[email protected]> • #114
A suggestion for RFC1939
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:37:04 +0530
"Faheem" <[email protected]> • #113
Announcement of MailConnect 6
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:32:44 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Extended RETR - version 2
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:29:13 -0800 (PST)
<[email protected]> • #111
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.