gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive

1437 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: References: none
30 Apr 2019 22:14:23 -0400
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12856
References: none
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:51:18 -0700
Johnathan Galton <[email protected]> • #12855
Re: base64 encoding in rfc2045...
Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12854
base64 encoding in rfc2045...
Sun, 17 Mar 2019 15:24:35 -0400
"Valdis Klētnieks" <[email protected]> • #12853
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:04:06 +0000
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> • #12852
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:36:05 -0500
[email protected] • #12851
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:15:56 -0800
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> • #12850
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:01:49 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12849
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12848
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:42:02 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12847
Re: message/partial - is it still a thing?
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:21:27 +0000
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12846
message/partial - is it still a thing?
Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:03:20 -0500
[email protected] • #12845
Re: Mail headers on crack....
Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:10:33 +0000
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #12844
Mail headers on crack....
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:45:19 -0500
[email protected] • #12843
Re: Most common mail header fields seen with nonsyntactic values
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 23:17:08 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12842
Re: folded URLs
24 Jul 2018 12:50:05 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12841
Re: Question regarding RFC 2369
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:42:58 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12840
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12839
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:33:12 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12838
Re: (no subject)
24 Jul 2018 00:28:11 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12837
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:25:38 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12836
Re: (no subject)
24 Jul 2018 00:13:15 -0400
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12835
(no subject)
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:02:04 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12834
Most common mail header fields seen with nonsyntactic values
Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:28:51 -0400
Peter Occil <[email protected]> • #12833
Re: Question regarding RFC 2369
21 Jul 2018 16:19:53 -0400
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12832
Re: Question regarding RFC 2369
Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:32:13 +0100
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> • #12831
Proposal to invoke a 7601bis effort
Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:39:55 +0000
"Kurt Andersen (b)" <[email protected]> • #12830
Re: The joys of being an MUA maintainer...
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:06:43 -0400
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #12829
The joys of being an MUA maintainer...
Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:11:04 -0400
[email protected] • #12828
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:52:01 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12827
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:47:03 -0700
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #12826
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:02:20 +0100
Paul Overell <[email protected]> • #12825
Re: [abnf-discuss] Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:52:22 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #12824
Re: Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:37:11 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12823
Wherefore no HTAB in literal text strings in ABNF
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:34:56 -0700
Sean Leonard <[email protected]> • #12822
Re: Q: Space stuffing (RFC 3676)
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:59:03 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12821
Re: Q: Space stuffing (RFC 3676)
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:39:43 +0100
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #12820
Q: Space stuffing (RFC 3676)
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:53:31 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12819
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Fri, 01 Jul 2016 23:23:33 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #12818
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:17:26 -0800
Randall Gellens <[email protected]> • #12817
Re: DKIM differs from "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:57:07 -0800
Jim Fenton <[email protected]> • #12816
DKIM differs from "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:29:26 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12815
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:52:38 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12814
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:33:54 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12813
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:13:42 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12812
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:00:52 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12811
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:00:22 +0100
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #12810
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:53:58 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12809
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:31:57 +0100
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #12808
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:23:21 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12807
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:33:18 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12806
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:39:19 +0100
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #12805
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Sat, 02 Jan 2016 15:38:37 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12804
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:05:42 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12803
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:05:00 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12802
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:02:52 -0800
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12801
Re: "--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:48:36 +0000
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> • #12800
"--" first in lines to indicate start of signature
Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:50:46 +0100
Jacob Palme <[email protected]> • #12799
Re: inventive syntax, at least
Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:20:49 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12798
Re: inventive syntax, at least
Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:52:47 +0000
Martijn Grooten <[email protected]> • #12797
Re: inventive syntax, at least
Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:49:40 +0100
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> • #12796
Re: inventive syntax, at least
15 Nov 2014 04:18:02 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12795
Re: inventive syntax, at least
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:46:28 +0100
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> • #12794
Re: inventive syntax, at least
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:28:39 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12793
Re: inventive syntax, at least
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:24:44 -1000
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12792
inventive syntax, at least
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:16:37 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12791
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:07:38 -0700
Chris Newman <[email protected]> • #12790
Re: utf8 messages
Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:46:08 +0200
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> • #12789
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12788
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:02:40 +0100
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #12787
Re: utf8 messages
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 05:03:50 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12786
Re: utf8 messages
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 12:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12785
Re: utf8 messages
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12784
Re: utf8 messages
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:49:43 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12783
Re: utf8 messages
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:23:13 +0200
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> • #12782
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 23:52:22 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12781
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12780
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:44:58 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12779
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:15:43 +0000
Daniel Vargha <[email protected]> • #12778
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12777
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:38:58 +0000
Daniel Vargha <[email protected]> • #12776
Re: utf8 messages
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:27:08 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12775
Re: utf8 messages
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12774
Re: utf8 messages
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:41:24 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12773
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12772
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12771
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:21:56 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12770
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:07:09 +0000
Daniel Vargha <[email protected]> • #12769
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12768
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:29:54 +0200
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> • #12767
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:17:53 +0000
Daniel Vargha <[email protected]> • #12766
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:08:30 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12765
Re: utf8 messages
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 01:00:32 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12764
Re: utf8 messages
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12763
Re: utf8 messages
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:08:36 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12762
Re: utf8 messages
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12761
Re: utf8 messages
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:27:34 +0200
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> • #12760
Re: utf8 messages
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:20:27 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12759
Re: utf8 messages
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12758
utf8 messages
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:45:48 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12757
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.