gmane.ietf.rohc archive

361 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Tue, 26 May 2009 11:09:55 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4728
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-04
Tue, 26 May 2009 11:08:03 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4727
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Tue, 26 May 2009 11:05:29 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4726
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 26 May 2009 10:51:40 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4725
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 26 May 2009 10:43:56 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4724
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 23:45:08 -0400
"Ertekin, Emre [USA]" <[email protected]> • #4723
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Tue, 19 May 2009 18:25:26 -0400
"Ertekin, Emre [USA]" <[email protected]> • #4722
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-04
Tue, 19 May 2009 18:25:25 -0400
"Ertekin, Emre [USA]" <[email protected]> • #4721
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Tue, 19 May 2009 18:25:25 -0400
"Ertekin, Emre [USA]" <[email protected]> • #4720
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 14:36:58 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4719
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 23:25:43 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #4718
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 14:14:57 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4717
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 22:56:13 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #4716
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:21:03 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4715
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:26:41 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4714
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 12:10:25 -0700
"Templin, Fred L" <[email protected]> • #4713
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 21:03:18 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #4712
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 11:51:56 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4711
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 20:44:08 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #4710
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 11:14:41 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4709
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 09:42:48 -0700
Joe Touch <[email protected]> • #4708
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:41:24 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4707
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:41:19 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4706
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:25:17 +0200
Carl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #4705
Re: [rohc] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 12:59:50 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4704
Re: Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 12:18:17 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]> • #4703
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Tue, 19 May 2009 13:03:45 +0300
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> • #4702
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Tue, 19 May 2009 11:40:17 +0200
Carl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #4701
Re: [tsv-area] Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Tue, 19 May 2009 11:08:23 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4700
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Tue, 19 May 2009 10:42:34 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4699
[Fwd: Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU]
Tue, 19 May 2009 09:08:23 +0200
Carl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #4698
Path MTU discovery when having varying MTU
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:33:51 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4697
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Tue, 19 May 2009 02:43:35 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4696
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:40:05 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4695
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:21:25 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4694
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Mon, 18 May 2009 16:21:15 +0300
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> • #4693
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:05:41 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4692
AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:46:27 +0300
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> • #4691
Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Sat, 16 May 2009 21:11:20 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4690
AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-04
Thu, 14 May 2009 18:09:00 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4689
AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08
Thu, 14 May 2009 18:09:05 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4688
AD comments on draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10
Thu, 14 May 2009 18:08:57 +0200
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> • #4687
Re: 0xE0 and 0x07 - CRC
Mon, 4 May 2009 16:09:45 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4686
0xE0 and 0x07 - CRC
Mon, 4 May 2009 18:23:50 +0530
Karthik Balaguru <[email protected]> • #4685
Re: Determining p value for WLSB of RTP SN.
Sun, 03 May 2009 10:45:37 +0800
Ang Way Chuang <[email protected]> • #4684
Re: Determining p value for WLSB of RTP SN.
Sat, 2 May 2009 19:55:00 +0200 (MEST)
Carl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #4683
Determining p value for WLSB of RTP SN.
Sat, 02 May 2009 11:52:48 +0800
Ang Way Chuang <[email protected]> • #4682
Re: Current ROHC IPR situation
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:22:53 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4681
Current ROHC IPR situation
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:40:32 -0700
Dmitri Varsanofiev <[email protected]> • #4680
Re: GSW and performance
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:57:45 +0530
Karthik Balaguru <[email protected]> • #4679
Re: GSW and performance
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:40:39 +0530
Karthik Balaguru <[email protected]> • #4678
Re: GSW and performance
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:01:52 +0200
Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> • #4677
GSW and performance
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:48:10 +0530
Karthik Balaguru <[email protected]> • #4676
ROHCv2 - Profile 0x000
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:07:31 +0200
Xavier LE BOURDON <[email protected]> • #4675
Re: Question regarding bit ordering in RTP headers packets RFC 3095
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:40:10 +0200
Carl Knutsson <[email protected]> • #4674
Question regarding bit ordering in RTP headers packets RFC 3095
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:00:35 +0800
Mihir Mehta <[email protected]> • #4673
Re: Query regarding ROHC-TCP/IP Profile
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:27:36 +0100
Raffles <[email protected]> • #4672
Query regarding ROHC-TCP/IP Profile
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:03:20 +0530
pradeep shambhu <[email protected]> • #4671
Query regarding ROHC-TCP/IP Profile
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:16:27 +0530
pradeep shambhu <[email protected]> • #4670
Re: Rohc over IP tunnel
Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:15:02 +0200
[email protected] • #4669
Re: Question related to ROHC-TCP Profile
Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:45:07 +0100
Raffles <[email protected]> • #4668
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.