gmane.ietf.sip archive
2919 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 30). Latest articles →
Re: renegotiate rtp <--> srtp in mid call
Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:02:32 -0400renegotiate rtp <--> srtp in mid call
Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:44:13 +0530Re: FROM-TAG(Local Tag) Need - Detailed Explained Req
Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:37:52 +0530Re: FROM-TAG(Local Tag) Need - Detailed Explained Req
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 19:09:58 +0530FROM-TAG(Local Tag) Need - Detailed Explained Req
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:28:06 +0530IPR Disclosure Alcatel Lucent's Statement about IPR related to RFC 5393
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:31:17 -0700IPR Disclosure Alcatel Lucent's Statement about IPR related to RFC 5393
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:28:55 -0700[Deadline Extended] IEEE International Workshop on Manageability and Security of Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Network (MASONS)
Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:20 -0700[AVTCORE] [Deadline Extended] IEEE International Workshop on Manageability and Security of Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Network (MASONS)
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:31:40 -0700MASONS 2015 - IEEE International Workshop on Manageability and Security of Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Network
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:46:15 -0800MISSION 2015 - IEEE Workshop on Management Issues in SDN, SDI and NFV
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:43:58 -0800IPR Disclosure: SSH Communications Security Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 5626
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:25:14 -0800IPR Disclosure: SSH Communications Security Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4028
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:21:51 -0800IPR Disclosure: Microsoft Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 5627
Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:26:38 -0700Closing the SIP and SIPPING mailing lists
Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:40:38 -0600ISDN/SIP interworking [ETSI TS 183 036]
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:59:24 +0100Re: SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:36:35 +0800Re: SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:25:11 +0100Re: SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:04:02 +0800SDP telephone-event (DTMF) payload negotiation
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:22:05 +0100Re: 101 dialog establishment/ambiguous
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:11:19 +0100101 dialog establishment/ambiguous
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:41:38 +0530 (IST)Question on rfc4474
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:51:31 -0500Re: Which WG RFC 5626 belongs to?
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:24:46 +0200Which WG RFC 5626 belongs to?
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:22:54 +0200RFC 5626 (Outbound) hard to understand non-register request processing
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:52:23 +0200Re: How to determine MO and MT call in SIP Networks
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:06:06 +0200How to determine MO and MT call in SIP Networks
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:29:55 +0530[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6072 (2988)
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:00:13 -0700 (PDT)Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:08:56 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:33:34 -0700Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:40:02 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:35:19 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:23:10 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:21:50 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:26:26 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:25:54 -0500Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:46:16 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:18:41 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:08:10 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:12:57 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:50:44 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:05:49 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:31:14 +0000Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:04:52 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:03:31 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:41:41 +0000Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:33:44 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:27:27 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:22:29 +0000Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:44:17 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:30:52 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:25:24 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:08:53 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:58:59 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:46:52 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:38:44 +0200Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:23:41 +0200Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:01:22 +0200Re: Sent 18x with 'require:100rel' but no PRACK recieved
Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:42:42 +0530Sent 18x with 'require:100rel' but no PRACK recieved
Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:17:39 +0800Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:48:43 -0400Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:37:55 -0700Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:09:14 -0400Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:31:40 -0400Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 14:16:51 +0200Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:36:42 -0400Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 21:15:43 -0700Re: [sipcore] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:46:10 -0500Re: Table2/3 maintenance (was Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910))
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:56:18 +0200Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:24:27 +0200Fred Stacey is out of the office.
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:03:51 -0400Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:57:28 -0500Table2/3 maintenance (was Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910))
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:48:49 -0500Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:28:53 +0200Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:58:50 -0400[Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910)
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 07:53:59 -0700 (PDT)Re: Types of Conference calls supported by SIP
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:09:32 -0500Types of Conference calls supported by SIP
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:54:22 +0530Test, please ignore
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:35:34 -0500Re: Codec Negotiation and renegotiataion
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:01:43 -0400Re: Codec Negotiation and renegotiataion
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:54:28 +0200Codec Negotiation and renegotiataion
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:59:40 +0530 (IST)Fred Stacey is out of the office.
Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:12:08 -0400Re: draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?
Fri, 8 Jul 2011 22:32:31 +0200Re: draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?
Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:52:29 +0200Re: draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?
Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:10:19 +0200draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?
Fri, 8 Jul 2011 18:53:04 +0200Re: Sip Digest, Vol 82, Issue 6
Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:00:41 +0200Re: Sip Digest, Vol 82, Issue 6
Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:24:48 +0800Re: 302 Redirect on REGISTER
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:08:16 -0700Re: 302 Redirect on REGISTER
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:13:45 +0200Re: 302 Redirect on REGISTER
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:08:42 -0700Difference between B2BUA and Proxy
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:40:55 +0000Re: sip qos
Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:08:39 +0200Re: sip qos
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:21:04 -0500Re: sip qos
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:15:41 -0400Re: sip qos
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:38:34 +0200sip qos
Tue, 31 May 2011 22:44:27 +0200Test, please ignore
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:41:35 -0500
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.