gmane.ietf.syslog archive

368 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5424 (5010)
Fri, 5 May 2017 18:57:15 +0200
Job Snijders <[email protected]> • #2907
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5424 (5010)
Fri, 5 May 2017 17:46:27 +0100
t.petch <[email protected]> • #2906
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5424 (5010)
Fri, 5 May 2017 03:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #2905
[FWD] [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-06]
Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:39:14 +0100
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> • #2904
Re: Request for clarification of RTF 5424 Section 6.2.5(APP-NAME)
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:08:56 +0000
"Remeika, James C." <[email protected]> • #2903
Re: Request for clarification of RTF 5424 Section 6.2.5(APP-NAME)
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:41:35 +0100
t.petch <[email protected]> • #2902
Request for clarification of RTF 5424 Section 6.2.5 (APP-NAME)
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:48:29 +0000
"Remeika, James C." <[email protected]> • #2901
Re: Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:28:06 -0500
William Herrin <[email protected]> • #2900
Re: Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:34:47 +0000
Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]> • #2899
Re: [OPSAWG] Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:54:14 -0500
"ietfdbh" <[email protected]> • #2898
Re: Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:10:13 -0800
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email protected]> • #2897
Re: Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:47:20 +0000
"Aditya Dogra (addogra)" <[email protected]> • #2896
Re: Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:26:25 -0800
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email protected]> • #2895
Syslog message to Remote Rerver
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:25:29 +0000
"Aditya Dogra (addogra)" <[email protected]> • #2894
Re: I-D Action:draft-cloud-log-01.txt (fwd)
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:29:13 -0500
Gene Golovinsky <[email protected]> • #2893
Re: I-D Action:draft-cloud-log-01.txt (fwd)
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:05:56 -0700
Raffael Marty <[email protected]> • #2892
I-D Action:draft-cloud-log-01.txt (fwd)
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2891
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:47:33 -0600
Gene Golovinsky <[email protected]> • #2890
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:20:58 -0500
Dan Schlitt <[email protected]> • #2889
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:35:19 -0500
"Heinbockel, Bill" <[email protected]> • #2888
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:54:16 +0100
Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> • #2887
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:34:06 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2886
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:56:41 +0100
Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> • #2885
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:39:43 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2884
Re: draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:35:07 +0100
Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> • #2883
draft-cloud-log-00 / CEE - why not IPFIX?
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:17:28 +0100
Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> • #2882
I-D Action:draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-08.txt (fwd)
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:39:56 -0800 (PST)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2881
Re: New syslog/tcp draft available
Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:47:10 -0500
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #2880
Re: New syslog/tcp draft available
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2879
Re: New syslog/tcp draft available
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:12:25 -0500
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #2878
New syslog/tcp draft available
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2877
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5424 (2682)
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:05:45 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2876
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5424 (2682)
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:43:31 +0100
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2875
[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5424 (2682)
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 23:58:56 -0800 (PST)
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> • #2874
Re: New Version Notification for draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-05 (fwd)
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2873
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:39:13 -0500
[email protected] • #2872
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:48:45 -0800
Anton Chuvakin <[email protected]> • #2871
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:23:41 +0100
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2870
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:25:55 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2869
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:25:10 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #2868
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:21:40 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2867
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2866
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:25:50 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #2865
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:26:13 -0500
"Heinbockel, Bill" <[email protected]> • #2864
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:06:54 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2863
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:52:34 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #2862
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:38:51 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2861
Re: Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:51:43 +0800
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2860
Small draft for Syslog File Storage?
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:24:17 +0100
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2859
Re: New Version Notification fordraft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-05 (fwd)
Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:52:28 +0800
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2858
Re: New Version Notification for draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-05 (fwd)
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:01:49 +0100
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2857
Re: Conclusion of the syslog WG - THANK YOU!
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:42:52 -0700
todd glassey <[email protected]> • #2856
Congrats to everyone
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:34:53 -0700
Jon Callas <[email protected]> • #2855
Publication of RFC 6012
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2854
Re: Conclusion of the syslog WG - THANK YOU!
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:10:05 +0200
"Rainer Gerhards" <[email protected]> • #2853
Conclusion of the syslog WG - THANK YOU!
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2852
WG Action: Conclusion of Security Issues in Network Event Logging (syslog)
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
IESG Secretary <[email protected]> • #2851
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-cloud-log-00.txt (fwd)
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:52:56 -0500
Gene Golovinsky <[email protected]> • #2850
I-D ACTION:draft-cloud-log-00.txt (fwd)
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2849
RFC 6012 on Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #2848
New Version Notification for draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-05 (fwd)
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2847
Update on syslog/dtls
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2846
Re: Protocol Action: 'Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog' to Proposed Standard (fwd)
Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:51:08 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2845
Re: Protocol Action: 'Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog' to Proposed Standard (fwd)
Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:14:38 -0400
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #2844
Protocol Action: 'Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog' to Proposed Standard (fwd)
Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2843
Protocol Action: 'Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog' to Proposed Standard
Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
The IESG <[email protected]> • #2842
I-D Action:draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-06.txt
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #2841
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:24:17 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2840
Udate on open issues - 22 June 2010
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2839
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2838
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:22:06 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2837
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:25:58 -0700
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]> • #2836
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:21:53 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2835
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:38:59 -0700
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]> • #2834
Re: Issue 14 - Unreliable Delivery
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:07:25 -0700
Jon Callas <[email protected]> • #2833
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:46:13 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2832
Re: Issue 14 - Unreliable Delivery
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:22:20 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2831
Re: Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:08:35 -0700
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]> • #2830
Re: Issue 14 - Unreliable Delivery
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:47:38 -0700
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]> • #2829
Re: Issue 15 - DoS measures
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:38:20 -0700
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]> • #2828
Re: Issue 16 - Security Policies
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:33:34 -0700
"Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]> • #2827
Issue 16 - Security Policies
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2826
Issue 15 - DoS measures
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2825
Issue 14 - Unreliable Delivery
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2824
secdir review of draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-05 (fwd)
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2823
Status of syslog/dtls ISSUES
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2822
Re: Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:18:40 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2821
Re: Issue 12 - nit
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:56:25 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2820
Re: Issue 3 - Text revision from GENART review
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:56:48 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2819
Re: Issue 7 - text
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:56:04 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2818
Re: Issue 8 - Tim Polk DISCUSS
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:14:02 -0400
"David Harrington" <[email protected]> • #2817
Re: Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:10:25 -0400
[email protected] • #2816
Re: Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2815
Re: Issue 6 - Reference 2
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> • #2814
Re: Issue 6 - Reference 2
Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:46:36 -0400
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #2813
Re: Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT
Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:44:40 -0400
Sean Turner <[email protected]> • #2812
Re: Issue 13 - DCCP?
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:59:41 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2811
Re: Issue 2 - Fragmentation
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:36:45 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2810
Re: Issue 8 - Tim Polk DISCUSS
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:05:30 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2809
Re: Issue 9, 9a, and 9b - from a Tim Polk COMMENT
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:22:57 +0200
"t.petch" <[email protected]> • #2808
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.