gmane.ietf.whois archive

188 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:51:20 -0500
"Gavin Williams (Hexillion)" <[email protected]> • #262
Re: Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:17:31 +0200
"Francesco ORLANDO" <[email protected]> • #261
Re: Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:17:06 +0200
"Francesco ORLANDO" <[email protected]> • #260
Re: Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:32:41 -0700
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #259
Re: Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:53:14 -0400 (EDT)
Dana Hudes <[email protected]> • #258
Re: Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:09:44 +0200
Engin Gunduz <[email protected]> • #257
Regarding whois query in xml format
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 03:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Rajat <[email protected]> • #256
Re: How do I identify if a particular registrar complies with the 'wh ois export and exchange format'?
Sun, 18 May 2003 11:37:53 -0500
Bill Weinman <[email protected]> • #254
How do I identify if a particular registrar complies with the 'wh ois export and exchange format'?
Fri, 2 May 2003 10:04:35 -0400
"Chhabria, Kavita - Apogent" <[email protected]> • #253
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:44:18 -0400 (CLT)
"Hugo Salgado Hernández" <[email protected]> • #252
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:40:55 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #251
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:14:39 -0400
"Hugo Salgado H." <[email protected]> • #250
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:15:50 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #249
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:17:46 -0400
"Derek J. Balling" <[email protected]> • #248
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:03:42 -0500
Bill Weinman <[email protected]> • #247
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:04:01 -0400
"Derek J. Balling" <[email protected]> • #246
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:12:39 -0500
Bill Weinman <[email protected]> • #245
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:34:38 -0400
"Hugo Salgado H." <[email protected]> • #244
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:04:23 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #243
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:30:30 -0400
"Derek J. Balling" <[email protected]> • #242
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:18:40 +0200
Shane Kerr <[email protected]> • #241
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:00:30 -0400
"Hugo Salgado H." <[email protected]> • #240
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Fri, 06 Sep 2002 10:31:57 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #239
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:41:46 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #238
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 22:01:09 +0200
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #237
Re: Request to Move RFC 954 to Historic Status
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 13:32:26 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #236
FYI: [ARIN] New Whois Display Format
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:27:39 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #235
NC teleconf 14/02/02 Agenda item 5: WHOIS referral from ICANN
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:33:23 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #234
Re: Some food for thought
Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:43:29 -0800
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #233
Some food for thought
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:28:53 -0800
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #232
Registering handle suffixes
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:22:03 +0100
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #231
!43 BoF @ -53; co-chair status; whois-fix status
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:33:09 -0800
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #230
Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:36:57 -0500
"Allen Smith" <[email protected]> • #229
Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:01:15 +0100 (CET)
Bruce Campbell <[email protected]> • #228
Re: [Uwho] Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:16:01 -0800
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #227
Re: [Uwho] Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:29:35 +0100
Jefsey Morfin <[email protected]> • #226
Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Rick H Wesson <[email protected]> • #225
Re: Someone want to forward this to Mr. Allen Smith?
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:45:33 -0500
"Allen Smith" <[email protected]> • #224
Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:41:43 -0500
"Allen Smith" <[email protected]> • #223
Someone want to forward this to Mr. Allen Smith?
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:35:16 -0800
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #222
Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:27:50 -0800
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #221
Re: draft-campbell-whois-00.txt
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:42:43 -0500
"Allen Smith" <[email protected]> • #220
Draft: Request to Move RFC-954 to Historic Status
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:49:29 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #219
(unknown)
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:41:01 -0500
Ted Wolf Jr <[email protected]> • #218
Draft on 'WHOIS' Protocol, without implications inherent in RFC954
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:00:45 +0100 (CET)
Bruce Campbell <[email protected]> • #217
Planning for Salt Lake
Fri, 09 Nov 2001 19:48:34 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #216
Re: whois in the host location
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:10:08 -0500
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #215
Re: whois in the host location
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:19:04 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #214
whois in the host location
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:28:45 +0100
"sal"<[email protected]> • #213
RE: whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 18:06:03 +0100
"sal"<[email protected]> • #212
Re: whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:48:14 -0800
Randy Bush <[email protected]> • #211
RE: whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:48:13 -0800
JC Dill <[email protected]> • #210
Re: whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:45:58 +0100
"sal"<[email protected]> • #209
RE: whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:41:13 +0100
"sal"<[email protected]> • #208
Re: whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:44:08 +0100
Andrei Robachevsky <[email protected]> • #207
whois and dns...
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:20:38 +0100
"sal"<[email protected]> • #206
FWD: ARIN/RIPE/APNIC WHOIS:43 bulk copy policy
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:42:04 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #205
FYI: P3P Latest republished (editing glitch)
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:38:21 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #204
Montevideo note
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:33:33 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #203
RWhois update
Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
Cathy Murphy <[email protected]> • #202
New Whois-like maillist
Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cathy Murphy <[email protected]> • #201
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:10:14 +0200
Shane Kerr <[email protected]> • #200
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:17:45 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #199
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:09:46 -0700
Randy Bush <[email protected]> • #198
The meaning of "whois"
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:56:22 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #197
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:46:52 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #196
Proposal for two of three parts of the whoisfix charter
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:22:52 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #195
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:57:11 -0700
Randy Bush <[email protected]> • #194
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 5 Sep 2001 19:37:41 +0200
"Marco d'Itri" <[email protected]> • #193
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 5 Sep 2001 18:12:18 +0200
Joao Luis Silva Damas <[email protected]> • #192
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:44:22 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #191
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:24:18 -0700
Randy Bush <[email protected]> • #190
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:16:37 +0100
Jean Camp <[email protected]> • #189
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Sun, 02 Sep 2001 10:10:02 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #188
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Sun, 02 Sep 2001 09:57:20 -0700
Randy Bush <[email protected]> • #187
Re: Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Sun, 02 Sep 2001 09:50:37 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #186
Notice to Mariners: loss of navigational aids ("whois consultations")
Sun, 02 Sep 2001 12:29:57 -0400
Eric Brunner <[email protected]> • #185
Minutes: Whoisfix BOF
Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:34:16 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #184
clarification
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:43:39 +0100
Jean Camp <[email protected]> • #183
Re: Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:53:47 +0300
Svetlana Tkachenko <[email protected]> • #182
Re: Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:08:06 -0700
Randy Bush <[email protected]> • #181
Re: Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:42:25 -0400
Daniel Manley <[email protected]> • #180
Re: Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:34:41 +0900
[email protected] • #179
Re: Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 04:23:40 -0700
Jeff Williams <[email protected]> • #178
Re: Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:49:58 +0200 (CEST)
Engin Gunduz <[email protected]> • #177
Whoisfix BOF 51st IETF / Minutes
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:34:06 +0100
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #176
Re: not 43 mailing list
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 08:10:15 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #175
not 43 mailing list
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 05:11:09 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #174
Re: DNSO Announcement about WHOIS survey
Sat, 04 Aug 2001 16:52:14 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #173
RE: DNSO Announcement about WHOIS survey
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 15:45:35 -0400
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #172
Re: DNSO Announcement about WHOIS survey
Sat, 04 Aug 2001 13:45:06 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #171
RE: DNSO Announcement about WHOIS survey
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:23:27 -0400
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #170
Re: DNSO Announcement about WHOIS survey
Sat, 04 Aug 2001 11:36:52 -0400
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> • #169
Re: DNSO Announcement about WHOIS survey
Sat, 04 Aug 2001 14:33:50 +0100
"Paul M. Kane" <[email protected]> • #168
Re: !43 bar BOF
Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:42:05 +0200
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #167
RE: !43 bar BOF
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 16:41:19 -0400
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #166
Re: !43 bar BOF
Thu, 02 Aug 2001 20:17:31 +0200
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]> • #165
Re: IETF-51 WhoisFix BoF Announcement
Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:24:57 -0700
Jeff Williams <[email protected]> • #164
Re: !43 bar BOF
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:04:19 -0400
Andrew Newton <[email protected]> • #163
Re: IETF-51 WhoisFix BoF Announcement
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 12:48:58 -0400
"Ross Wm. Rader" <[email protected]> • #162
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.