gmane.linux.debian.curiosa archive
749 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 8). Latest articles →
Re: Package naming rant
Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:29:15 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:23:49 -0400Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:47:34 +0000Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:57:45 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:09:12 +0000Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:59:42 -0400Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:08:00 -0500Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:53:50 +0000Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:46:47 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:27:07 +0100Re: Package naming rant
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:32:06 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:54:17 +0200Re: removing ftp:// from mirrors lists
Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:30:20 +0000Re: Package naming rant
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:25:56 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:23:21 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:05:32 +0100Re: Package naming rant
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:43:19 +0000Re: Package naming rant
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:26:26 +0200Re: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:33:10 +0200Re: Package naming rant
Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:25:35 +0200Package naming rant
Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:43:07 +0200Re: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:12:32 +0100Re: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:45:29 +1000Re: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:39:48 +0200Re: Fwd: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:09:22 -0500Re: Fwd: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:16:48 +0200Fwd: You wouldn't miss it . . .
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:25:02 +0200 (CEST)chung cư quận tây hồ - View Hồ Tây - Hà Nội
Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:00:14 +0700Re: DE discussions
Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:38:30 +0530Re: DE discussions
Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:53:47 +0100Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:43:24 +0100Re: Before I send a bug report to change DebTags please do some sanity check
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:14:24 +0100Re: DE discussions
Sat, 6 Feb 2016 11:44:55 +0100DE discussions
Sat, 6 Feb 2016 08:32:38 +0530Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Sat, 6 Feb 2016 02:47:52 +0100Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:10:45 -0600Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:23:22 -0500Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 19:09:04 +0100Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:47:40 -0600Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:45:49 +0100Re: Frustrated
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:10:42 +0100Re: [DSA 3464-1] rails security update
Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:57:34 -0600Fwd: Re: About Jenkins in Debian [origin: Thorsten Glaser]
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:33:23 +0100Re: qbzr: autopkgtest fails since 2015-01-01
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:06:24 -0600Re: qbzr: autopkgtest fails since 2015-01-01
Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:08:19 +0300Re: To override or not to override?
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:44:56 -0500Re: debian/control: enhanced version dependencies?
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:35:48 +0100Re: [debhelper-devel] Bug#811059: misleading warning: "This package will soon FTBFS" - but FTBFS now
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:26:21 +0100Re: support for merged /usr in Debian
Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:51:28 +0100Re: support for merged /usr in Debian
Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:02:55 +0100Re: support for merged /usr in Debian
Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:33:30 +0100Re: support for merged /usr in Debian
Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:47:50 +0100Re: support for merged /usr in Debian
Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:24:32 +0100Re: Bug#806455: Sorry for the annoyance
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:25:08 +0000Re: Bug#806455: Sorry for the annoyance
Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:07:27 +0100Re: Business proposal - advertising
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:15:00 +0800Re: Business proposal - advertising
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:03:27 +0100Business proposal - advertising
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:40:13 +0000Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:35:20 -0400Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:50:18 +0100Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:45:29 +0000Re: AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:29:18 +0100AGPLv3+ exception ("Additional Permission")
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:18:26 +0000Re: pybuild sphinxdoc and extensions
Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:30:48 -0400Re: pybuild sphinxdoc and extensions
Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:41:56 +0100Re: I/O issues with writing to mtdblock devices on kirkwood
Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:12:47 -0500Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sun, 4 Oct 2015 14:58:03 +0200Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sun, 4 Oct 2015 15:02:52 +0200Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:38:49 +0300Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sun, 4 Oct 2015 13:50:49 +0200Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sun, 4 Oct 2015 01:28:44 +0500Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sat, 03 Oct 2015 20:19:12 +0200Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:24:12 +0000Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 22:11:58 +0200Fw: read this
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 04:12:54 +0200Fw: read this
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 04:07:53 +0200Re: Bug#798714: debian-policy: Please explicitly recommend punctuation between the year, month and day components of date based version numbers
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:39:19 +0200Re: DAK Commands for Bikesheds
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:54:37 -0500Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Fri, 4 Sep 2015 20:24:02 +0200Web Design Guidelines
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:51:46 +1000Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:21:06 -0500Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:21:41 +0300Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:19:09 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:20:05 +0500Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:05:08 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:11:11 -0500Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:49:45 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:35:00 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:59:50 -0500Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:49:11 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:50:46 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:49:35 +0200Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:42:07 +0100Re: Fwd: Re: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#794830: aptitude: segfaults in memory allocation [origin: [email protected]]
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 02:14:52 +0200Fwd: Re: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#794830: aptitude: segfaults in memory allocation [origin: [email protected]]
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 01:41:47 +0200Re: [systemd-devel] Completion of error handling
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:37:41 +0100Re: Bug#786609: apt: undesirable behaviour when installing from repositories with low pin priorities (like experimental)
Sun, 24 May 2015 19:05:37 +0200Re: debianparty?
Fri, 1 May 2015 20:00:45 +0200Re: debianparty?
Sat, 02 May 2015 03:58:16 +1000debianparty?
Fri, 1 May 2015 19:38:11 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.