gmane.linux.debian.devel.toolchain archive

386 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Le funzioni del tuo conto sono state sospese
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 05:58:36 +0200
Klarna <[email protected]> • #1960
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:55:59 -0700
Vipul Goel <[email protected]> • #1959
Bug#1139691: Should cross-gcc be removed from unstable?
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:06:17 -0000
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #1958
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:01:10 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #1957
Intention to drop multilib support from architecture cross bootstrap (rebootstrap)
Sat, 29 Nov 2025 11:45:23 +0100
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #1956
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 23:05:44 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #1955
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:27:20 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #1954
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #1953
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:42:08 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #1952
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 10:50:59 +0100
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #1951
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:49:27 -0600
Falco Girgis <[email protected]> • #1950
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:19:02 -0500
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #1949
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:57:25 +0100
Christopher Huhn <[email protected]> • #1948
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:56:58 +0100
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> • #1947
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:32:02 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #1946
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:48:43 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #1945
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Jaromír Cápík <[email protected]> • #1944
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:19:25 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #1943
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:20:01 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #1942
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:16:40 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #1941
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 01:04:52 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #1940
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:23:52 -0500
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #1939
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:35:49 +0000
[email protected] • #1938
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 23:17:55 +0100
Mateusz Jończyk <[email protected]> • #1937
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:24:50 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]> • #1936
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:07:39 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #1935
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:27:43 +0100
"Nikos Tsipinakis" <[email protected]> • #1934
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:58:04 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #1933
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:05:07 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]> • #1932
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:47:25 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #1931
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:28:34 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]> • #1930
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 05:39:09 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #1929
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:47:13 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]> • #1928
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:39:45 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #1927
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1926
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:40:51 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #1925
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:24 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #1924
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:54 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #1923
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:48:20 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #1922
AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #1921
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:32:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1920
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1919
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:15:37 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #1918
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:09:19 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #1917
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:07:07 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #1916
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:39:44 +0100
[email protected] • #1915
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:59:11 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #1914
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:06:25 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #1913
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:18:38 +0200
Sicelo <[email protected]> • #1912
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #1911
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:12:03 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #1910
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:38:57 -0400
Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> • #1909
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 22:22:35 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]> • #1908
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:30 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #1907
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:13:45 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #1906
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:22:02 +0000
Colin Watson <[email protected]> • #1905
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:01:52 +0000
Martin <[email protected]> • #1904
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:31:00 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #1903
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:00:11 +0530
kiruthikaanbusuresh <[email protected]> • #1902
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:29 +0100
Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]> • #1901
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:06 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #1900
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:55:11 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #1899
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:33:28 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1898
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:55:50 +0100
Gerardo Ballabio <[email protected]> • #1897
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:45:30 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #1896
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 08:19:48 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #1895
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 22:20:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #1894
Actual case of harm due to linux-libc-dev vs c-t-b difference: input-utils
Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:19:45 +0200
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #1893
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:51:01 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #1892
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:29:02 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #1891
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:15:57 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #1890
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:24:41 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1889
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:12:08 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #1888
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:22:17 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #1887
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 14:17:58 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #1886
Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:21:29 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #1885
SBOM generation for Debian packages is difficult
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:49:47 +0530
Vyom Yadav <[email protected]> • #1884
cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing
Mon, 30 Jun 2025 04:39:03 +0000
Debian testing autoremoval watch <[email protected]> • #1883
[Help] Specific options to cross-compile gcc and g++
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:44:36 +0200
Jose Gomez <[email protected]> • #1882
cross-gcc is marked for autoremoval from testing
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 04:39:02 +0000
Debian testing autoremoval watch <[email protected]> • #1881
Bug#1107126: is cross-gcc-dev still useful or can it be removed?
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 00:15:03 -0700
Dima Kogan <[email protected]> • #1880
Bug#1107126: is cross-gcc-dev still useful or can it be removed?
Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:50:47 +0200
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #1879
Re: Clarification Request Regarding CVE-2025-1176 Affecting binutils
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 23:06:46 +0200
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #1878
Clarification Request Regarding CVE-2025-1176 Affecting binutils
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:52:18 +0000
Sunil Kumar Dora <[email protected]> • #1877
1 New Message
Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:28:59 +0100
"Abudlaziz Ahmed" <[email protected]> • #1876
Re: Bug#1063684: cross-gcc-dev: needs update for gcc-13
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:59:49 -0800
Dima Kogan <[email protected]> • #1875
Processing of cross-gcc_249_amd64.changes
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:05:52 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #1874
cross-gcc_249_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:19:07 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #1873
Bug#1063684: marked as done (cross-gcc-dev: needs update for gcc-13)
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:15:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #1872
Bug#1063684: cross-gcc-dev: needs update for gcc-13
Sun, 11 Feb 2024 02:35:28 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #1871
ya sabían esto en la oficina?
Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:13:43 -0600
Recursos Humanos <[email protected]> • #1870
No recibí respuesta
Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:21:18 -0600
Lizbeth Gamboa <[email protected]> • #1869
Buenos días
Fri, 2 Jun 2023 09:07:11 -0600
Michelle Hansen <[email protected]> • #1868
Bug#973414: rustc: produces non-baseline opcodes for compiler_builtins::int::udiv::__udivmoddi4 on i386
Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:43:45 +0100
James Addison <[email protected]> • #1867
cross-gcc_248_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sun, 29 Jan 2023 20:45:31 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #1866
Bug#1029958: marked as done (cross-gcc-dev: gcc-13: update hunk context)
Sun, 29 Jan 2023 20:48:04 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #1865
Processing of cross-gcc_248_source.changes
Sun, 29 Jan 2023 20:29:24 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #1864
Bug#1029958: cross-gcc-dev: gcc-13: update hunk context
Sun, 29 Jan 2023 06:37:46 +0100
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #1863
cross-gcc_247_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 08:41:14 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #1862
Processing of cross-gcc_247_amd64.changes
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 07:56:36 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #1861
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.