gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k archive

407 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:21:47 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16515
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:46:35 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16514
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:34:19 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16513
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:29:08 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16512
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:13:46 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16511
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:06:44 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16510
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 14 Jun 2025 10:58:55 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16509
Re: Debian boot/login time
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:10:23 +0300
Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> • #16508
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 22:29:17 +0300
Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> • #16507
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:26:13 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #16506
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:24:38 +0200
Laurent Vivier <[email protected]> • #16505
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:53:09 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16504
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:15:16 +0300
Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> • #16503
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:33:15 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16502
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:21:09 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #16501
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:01:09 +0200
ALeX Kazik <[email protected]> • #16500
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:00:05 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16499
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:51:59 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16498
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:30:15 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #16497
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:23:22 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16496
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:09:31 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #16495
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:00:46 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16494
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:55:18 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #16493
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:22:52 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16492
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:16:46 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16491
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:15:52 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16490
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:12:31 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16489
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:56:29 +0300
Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> • #16488
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:36:01 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16487
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:54:23 +0300
Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> • #16486
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:06:03 +0200
Christian Groessler <[email protected]> • #16485
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 06:00:04 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16484
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:25:27 +0000
Administrator @ R·V·E <[email protected]> • #16483
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 18:19:52 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16482
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:27:18 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16481
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:18:42 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16480
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:16:12 -0700
Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]> • #16479
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:54:49 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16478
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:49:18 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16477
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:32:33 +0300
Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> • #16476
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:44:02 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16475
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:04:15 -0600
Stan Johnson <[email protected]> • #16474
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:46:26 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16473
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:32:26 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16472
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:31:40 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16471
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:26:34 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16470
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:20:59 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16469
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:18:52 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16468
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:16:54 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16467
Re: Bug#1107416: gcc-14: Please build with -fno-fold-mem-offsets on m68k
Sun, 08 Jun 2025 20:57:21 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16466
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sun, 8 Jun 2025 13:47:18 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #16465
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sun, 8 Jun 2025 11:10:38 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16464
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 16:06:06 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16463
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 23:43:12 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16462
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 11:43:00 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16461
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 18:55:39 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16460
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #16459
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:37:07 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16458
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:23:44 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16457
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:20:35 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16456
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:19:17 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16455
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 17:03:12 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16454
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:54:43 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16453
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:38:23 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16452
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:57:19 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16451
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:53:24 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16450
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 15:50:58 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16449
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:55:40 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #16448
Bug#1107416: gcc-14: Please build with -fno-fold-mem-offsets on m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:32:54 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16447
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:11:17 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16446
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:02:32 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #16445
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:58:03 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16444
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:44:23 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16443
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:44:16 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16442
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:20:57 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #16441
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 09:01:30 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #16440
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:33:43 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #16439
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 10:49:08 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #16438
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 05 Jun 2025 09:36:39 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16437
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:16:32 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #16436
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:56:22 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16435
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:50:53 +0200
Jean-Michel Hautbois <[email protected]> • #16434
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 05 Jun 2025 08:39:24 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16433
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:24:11 +0200
Jean-Michel Hautbois <[email protected]> • #16432
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:53:03 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16431
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:41:07 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16430
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:56:27 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16429
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:44:44 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16428
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:37:35 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16427
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:34:59 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16426
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:04:39 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16425
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Sun, 1 Jun 2025 19:44:53 -0600
Jeff Law <[email protected]> • #16424
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Sun, 01 Jun 2025 16:21:09 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16423
Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Wed, 28 May 2025 18:10:14 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #16422
DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux
Wed, 28 May 2025 09:19:46 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16421
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 20:50:12 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16420
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 14:48:36 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #16419
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16418
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 20:23:07 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #16417
Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k
Mon, 26 May 2025 14:16:46 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #16416
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.