gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64 archive

1328 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 14). Latest articles →

python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #28983
Pago incapacitado. ID de caso: -12369682-OYVGV2KHPWQX0RA.
Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:08:41 +0900
"@NewsInsideAppIe" <[email protected]> • #28982
Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:35:52 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #28981
Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec
Sun, 26 Nov 2023 15:07:09 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #28980
Re: Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec
Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:53:04 +0100
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #28979
Re: Happy 30 Years Debian Project
Sun, 5 Nov 2023 04:54:16 +0100
mi <[email protected]> • #28978
Re: Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec
Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:52:40 +0100
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #28977
Re: Kernel 6.5 from Experimental working
Fri, 8 Sep 2023 04:19:32 +0200
Luna Jernberg <[email protected]> • #28976
Re: Happy 30 Years Debian Project
Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:26:17 +0000
Tuco Ramirez <[email protected]> • #28975
Happy 30 Years Debian Project
Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:31:35 +0200
Luna Jernberg <[email protected]> • #28974
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:25:10 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28973
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:33:26 -0400
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> • #28972
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:08:17 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #28971
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 17:26:25 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28970
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:09:38 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28969
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:53:48 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28968
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:04:03 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28967
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:25:11 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28966
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:22:43 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28965
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:07:47 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28964
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:02:54 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28963
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:34:53 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28962
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:28:15 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28961
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:25:09 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28960
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:38:29 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28959
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:36:42 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28958
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:35:46 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28957
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:27:11 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28956
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:02:34 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #28955
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:09:38 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28954
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:10:09 -0400
"Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #28953
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:14:04 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #28952
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 02:11:19 +0100
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> • #28951
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:03:28 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #28950
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:53:46 -0700
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> • #28949
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:37:32 +0100
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> • #28948
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:20:56 +1000
Dave Chinner <[email protected]> • #28947
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:38:52 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #28946
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:27:50 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #28945
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:59:50 +0100
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> • #28944
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:50:47 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #28943
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:29:48 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #28942
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:55:29 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28941
LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:31:29 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28940
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 25 Jun 2023 13:37:19 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28939
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:15:14 +0800
Paul Wise <[email protected]> • #28938
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:46:42 +0200
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #28937
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:35:55 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28936
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:52:57 +0200
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #28935
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:46:59 +0100
Kirsten Bromilow <[email protected]> • #28934
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:25:09 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #28933
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:07:48 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #28932
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 05:52:44 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28931
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 05:50:35 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28930
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 02:27:56 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #28929
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 18:03:42 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #28928
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:19:46 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #28927
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:29:34 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28926
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 02:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> • #28925
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 17:14:07 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #28924
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:04:45 +0200
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #28923
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 16:37:55 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #28922
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:19:38 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28921
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 21:58:14 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28920
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 14:28:15 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #28919
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 14:11:20 +0200
Omer Turpault <[email protected]> • #28918
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 12:36:03 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #28917
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:45:57 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28916
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:32:55 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28915
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:19:28 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #28914
unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 09:31:05 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28913
Buenos días
Fri, 2 Jun 2023 08:49:58 -0600
Michelle Hansen <[email protected]> • #28912
Solicitud de apoyo
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:06:29 -0600
"Andrea Osorio" <[email protected]> • #28911
Atender porfavor
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:38:05 -0600
"Karen Peralta" <[email protected]> • #28910
Quedo atenta
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:30:14 -0600
"Ximena Figueroa" <[email protected]> • #28909
Re: numpy - scipy circular build requires makes both packages unbuildable on ia64 and x32
Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:45:18 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #28908
numpy - scipy circular build requires makes both packages unbuildable on ia64 and x32
Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:21:33 +0100
Mattias Ellert <[email protected]> • #28907
LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:25:53 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #28906
Re: ja majer
Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:00:20 -0500
Brayan Chirino <[email protected]> • #28905
Wonderful! I discovered that UniFi Cloud Key Gen 2 Plus is powered by Debian Linux 9
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:21:39 +0800
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <[email protected]> • #28904
Wichtig: Aktivieren Sie Ihr Konto
Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:02:52 +0300
Postbank BestSign App <[email protected]> • #28903
Debian SID (was Re: Debian 10) update results in graphics issue
Sat, 6 Aug 2022 14:21:12 -0600
Stan Johnson <[email protected]> • #28902
Debian 10 update results in graphics issue
Sat, 6 Aug 2022 13:42:38 -0600
Stan Johnson <[email protected]> • #28901
Re: enabling link time optimizations in package builds
Fri, 1 Jul 2022 22:40:03 +0200
Timo Röhling <[email protected]> • #28900
enabling link time optimizations in package builds
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:18:43 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #28899
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:40:26 -0400
Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]> • #28898
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:49:59 -0400
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> • #28897
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:18:17 -0400
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> • #28896
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:12:23 +0200
Elmar Stellnberger <[email protected]> • #28895
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:07:10 +0200
Elmar Stellnberger <[email protected]> • #28894
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 22:50:55 -0400
Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]> • #28893
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:45:37 +0200
Levis Yarema <[email protected]> • #28892
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:47:43 +0200
Elmar Stellnberger <[email protected]> • #28891
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:37:24 +0800
Paul Wise <[email protected]> • #28890
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:36:05 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #28889
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:21:53 -0400
Marianne Bayoy <[email protected]> • #28888
Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:03:01 -0400
Paul Daniel <[email protected]> • #28887
amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5113-1] firefox-esr security update)
Tue, 12 Apr 2022 05:59:03 +0200
Friedhelm Waitzmann <[email protected]> • #28886
AGNES asked about you
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 06:35:14 +0100
Kparo Rice <[email protected]> • #28885
YUN was asking about you
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:39:48 +0100
Catherine Peter <[email protected]> • #28884
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.