gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa archive

567 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:35:31 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8404
Re: Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:29:45 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #8403
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:21:29 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #8402
Re: Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:03:14 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8401
Bug#1122336: libreoffice: Smoketest fails on hppa and powerpc due to missing soffice.sh
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:40:54 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8400
Bug#1122205: RM: rhonabwy -- ROM; upstream is no longer maintained and depends on obsolete packages, FTBFS with gnutls 3.8.11
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 13:34:17 -0500
Nicolas Mora <[email protected]> • #8399
Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-12-06
Sat, 06 Dec 2025 09:29:21 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8398
Bug#1121970: RM: r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove for 32 bit architectures (architecture-is-64-bit was added to Build-Depends)
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:54:03 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #8397
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:01:10 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #8396
OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:28:28 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #8395
Bug#1121732: RM: seqan2 [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Building on 32bit architectures prevented
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:18:05 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #8394
64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:31:03 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #8393
Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:18:58 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #8392
Re: 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:33:11 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8391
gcc-16, first packaging bits
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 13:12:30 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #8390
What does the publishing charged?
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 21:01:12 +0500
"stephanie M.pigg" <[email protected]> • #8389
Bug#1121002: libstreamvbyte: Consider disabling the build on unsupported architectures
Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:02:39 +0100
Florent 'Skia' Jacquet <[email protected]> • #8388
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 23:05:44 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #8387
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:27:20 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #8386
Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-11-11
Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:39:04 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8385
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #8384
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:42:08 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #8383
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:56:56 +0000
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> • #8382
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 10:50:59 +0100
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #8381
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:49:27 -0600
Falco Girgis <[email protected]> • #8380
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:19:02 -0500
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #8379
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:57:25 +0100
Christopher Huhn <[email protected]> • #8378
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:56:58 +0100
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> • #8377
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:32:02 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #8376
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:48:43 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #8375
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Jaromír Cápík <[email protected]> • #8374
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:19:25 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #8373
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:20:01 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #8372
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:16:40 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #8371
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 01:04:52 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #8370
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 18:01:50 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #8369
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:23:52 -0500
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #8368
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:35:49 +0000
[email protected] • #8367
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 17:38:36 +0100
Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> • #8366
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:21:45 +0100
Julian Andres Klode <[email protected]> • #8365
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 14:30:10 +0000
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #8364
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 13:08:06 +0100
Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> • #8363
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 10:12:29 -0400
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #8362
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 10:10:06 -0400
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #8361
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:39:24 +0100
Julian Andres Klode <[email protected]> • #8360
Bug#1119819: mesa: FTBFS on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4: R600 Gallium driver configured to require LLVM
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 21:14:38 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #8359
Re: Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:16:23 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #8358
Hard Rust requirements from May onward
Fri, 31 Oct 2025 21:48:46 +0100
Julian Andres Klode <[email protected]> • #8357
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:58:04 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #8356
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:57:36 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #8355
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #8354
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:40:51 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #8353
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:24 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #8352
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:54 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #8351
AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #8350
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:48:20 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #8349
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:32:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8348
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8347
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:15:37 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #8346
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:07:07 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #8345
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:39:44 +0100
[email protected] • #8344
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:59:11 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #8343
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:06:25 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #8342
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:18:38 +0200
Sicelo <[email protected]> • #8341
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #8340
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:38:57 -0400
Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> • #8339
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:30 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #8338
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:13:45 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #8337
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:00:11 +0530
kiruthikaanbusuresh <[email protected]> • #8336
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:29 +0100
Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]> • #8335
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:06 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8334
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:33:28 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8333
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:55:50 +0100
Gerardo Ballabio <[email protected]> • #8332
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:45:30 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #8331
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 22:20:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #8330
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:51:01 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #8329
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:29:02 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #8328
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:15:57 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #8327
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:12:08 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #8326
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:22:17 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #8325
Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:21:29 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #8324
Bug#1116399: ffmpeg: FTBFS on hppa - Test filter-aemphasis-50fm fails
Fri, 26 Sep 2025 13:44:27 -0400
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #8323
Re: Bug#1115241: libsigc++-3.0-0 has executable stack on hppa
Sun, 14 Sep 2025 11:55:59 -0400
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #8322
Bug#1115241: libsigc++-3.0-0 has executable stack on hppa
Sun, 14 Sep 2025 14:36:42 +0200
Mattias Ellert <[email protected]> • #8321
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:47:52 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #8320
Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-08-29
Sat, 30 Aug 2025 00:00:33 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8319
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:07:41 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #8318
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 00:53:05 +0200
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #8317
qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #8316
Re: Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-08-21
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:25:24 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8315
Re: Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-08-21
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:21:06 +0200
Helge Deller <[email protected]> • #8314
Updated Debian Ports installation images 2025-08-21
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:31:14 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8313
Bug#1108322: gcc-14: Fix broken ada timespec record with -D_TIME_BITS=64 on 32-bit big-endian targets
Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:22:52 -0400
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #8312
Bug#1105111: python3.14 FTBFS on hppa: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Unrecoverable stack overflow (used -73734 kB) while calling a Python object
Sun, 11 May 2025 09:53:56 -0400
Stefano Rivera <[email protected]> • #8311
Re: Bug#1104665: gcc-15 ftbfs on hppa and loong64 (extraneous 'endif')
Mon, 5 May 2025 12:29:07 -0400
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #8310
Bug#1104665: gcc-15 ftbfs on hppa and loong64 (extraneous 'endif')
Sun, 4 May 2025 10:26:33 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #8309
Re: Bug#1103627: openjdk-20: Remove from Debian?
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:40:11 +0200
"Matthias Klose (Ubuntu)" <[email protected]> • #8308
boost1.88 also ftbfs on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4.
Sun, 6 Apr 2025 11:05:53 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #8307
Bug#1102196: boost1.88 unknown architectures
Sun, 6 Apr 2025 11:02:39 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #8306
Bug#1102068: libfabric: FTBFS on 32-bit arches: ofi_cma.h: error: passing argument 2 of 'ofi_consume_iov' from incompatible pointer type
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 15:07:42 +0200
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #8305
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.