gmane.linux.debian.ports.ia64 archive

489 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: c-t-b-ports fails to building glibc for arc-linux-gnu
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:19:47 +0200
Hector Oron <[email protected]> • #4740
c-t-b-ports fails to building glibc for arc-linux-gnu
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 04:18:25 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4739
Le funzioni del tuo conto sono state sospese
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 06:06:21 +0200
Klarna <[email protected]> • #4738
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 10:47:38 +0200
Roberto Innocenti <[email protected]> • #4737
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:41:35 +1200
Stuart MacIntosh <[email protected]> • #4736
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:55:59 -0700
Vipul Goel <[email protected]> • #4735
Yttrium porterbox?
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:05:23 -0800
Felix Lechner <[email protected]> • #4734
Bug#1125101: RM: xpra [armhf i386] -- RoQA; not built since 2023, still depends on pre-t64 libraries
Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:35:34 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4733
Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet
Wed, 31 Dec 2025 02:04:04 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4732
Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:17:17 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4731
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:01:10 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4730
OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:28:28 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4729
64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:31:03 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #4728
Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:18:58 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #4727
Re: 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:33:11 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4726
gcc-16, first packaging bits
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 13:12:30 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4725
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 23:05:44 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #4724
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:27:20 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #4723
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #4722
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:42:08 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #4721
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 10:50:59 +0100
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #4720
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:49:27 -0600
Falco Girgis <[email protected]> • #4719
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:19:02 -0500
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #4718
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:57:25 +0100
Christopher Huhn <[email protected]> • #4717
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:56:58 +0100
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> • #4716
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:32:02 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #4715
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:48:43 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #4714
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Jaromír Cápík <[email protected]> • #4713
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:19:25 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #4712
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:20:01 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4711
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:16:40 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #4710
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 01:04:52 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4709
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:23:52 -0500
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #4708
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:35:49 +0000
[email protected] • #4707
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:58:04 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #4706
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:57:36 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #4705
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #4704
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:40:51 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #4703
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:24 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #4702
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:54 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4701
AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4700
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:48:20 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4699
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:32:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4698
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4697
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:15:37 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4696
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:07:07 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4695
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:39:44 +0100
[email protected] • #4694
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:59:11 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #4693
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:06:25 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #4692
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:18:38 +0200
Sicelo <[email protected]> • #4691
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #4690
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:38:57 -0400
Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> • #4689
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:30 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4688
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:13:45 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4687
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:00:11 +0530
kiruthikaanbusuresh <[email protected]> • #4686
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:29 +0100
Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]> • #4685
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:06 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #4684
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:33:28 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4683
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:55:50 +0100
Gerardo Ballabio <[email protected]> • #4682
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:45:30 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #4681
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 22:20:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #4680
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:51:01 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #4679
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:29:02 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #4678
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:15:57 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4677
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:12:08 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #4676
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:22:17 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #4675
Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:21:29 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #4674
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:47:52 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #4673
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:07:41 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4672
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 00:53:05 +0200
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #4671
qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4670
Bug#1108247: gcc-15: Please drop patch ia64-disable-selective-scheduling.diff
Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:21:01 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4669
Re: Bug#1103627: openjdk-20: Remove from Debian?
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:40:11 +0200
"Matthias Klose (Ubuntu)" <[email protected]> • #4668
boost1.88 also ftbfs on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4.
Sun, 6 Apr 2025 11:05:53 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4667
Bug#1102196: boost1.88 unknown architectures
Sun, 6 Apr 2025 11:02:39 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4666
Re: Bug#970043: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sun, 15 Dec 2024 15:50:45 -0800
Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> • #4665
Bug#1086023: binutils: Please drop cross-support for ia64
Fri, 25 Oct 2024 09:52:52 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4664
Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:59:26 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4663
Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:48:21 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4662
Re: Linux 6.10
Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:06:12 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4661
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Tue, 28 May 2024 09:48:47 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4660
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Mon, 27 May 2024 17:14:38 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4659
Bug#970043: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sun, 26 May 2024 13:15:39 -0700
Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> • #4658
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sun, 26 May 2024 22:03:33 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4657
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sun, 26 May 2024 14:09:56 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4656
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sun, 26 May 2024 10:58:08 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4655
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sat, 25 May 2024 18:29:59 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4654
Bug#970043: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sat, 25 May 2024 18:26:12 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4653
Re: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Sat, 25 May 2024 10:38:11 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4652
Bug#970043: Request to help test ia64 build for galera-4
Fri, 24 May 2024 21:24:50 -0700
Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> • #4651
Re: Linux 6.9
Wed, 15 May 2024 15:44:47 +0200
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4650
Re: would like to trigger a rebuild of zeroc-ice on ia64
Sun, 05 May 2024 08:27:31 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4649
Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Patrick Franz <[email protected]>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1)
Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:31:56 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4648
Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms
Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:15:48 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4647
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:52:39 +0100
Helge Deller <[email protected]> • #4646
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4645
Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4644
Re: Linux 6.8
Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:30:46 +0100
Frank Scheiner <[email protected]> • #4643
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:37 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4642
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:15:45 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #4641
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.