gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips archive

2301 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 24). Latest articles →

Re: c-t-b-ports fails to building glibc for arc-linux-gnu
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:19:47 +0200
Hector Oron <[email protected]> • #10331
c-t-b-ports fails to building glibc for arc-linux-gnu
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 04:18:25 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10330
Le funzioni del tuo conto sono state sospese
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 06:06:21 +0200
Klarna <[email protected]> • #10329
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 10:47:38 +0200
Roberto Innocenti <[email protected]> • #10328
Bug#1143117: RM: gmt [armhf i386 loong64 ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; Unsupported architectures
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:03:44 +0200
Bas Couwenberg <[email protected]> • #10327
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:41:35 +1200
Stuart MacIntosh <[email protected]> • #10326
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:55:59 -0700
Vipul Goel <[email protected]> • #10325
help
28 Mar 2026 10:59:28 +0100
Jisun Lee <[email protected]> • #10324
Bug#1127019: RM: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- RoQA; This driver is for Hurd only and should not be build on Linux architecture
Thu, 05 Feb 2026 10:53:49 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10323
Bug#1126333: RM: binutils-mipsen -- RoQA; all mips* architectures removed from the archive
Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:18:03 +0100
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10322
Bug#1126132: arch-test: remove build dependency on binutils-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64
Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:53:36 +0100
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10321
Bug#1125101: RM: xpra [armhf i386] -- RoQA; not built since 2023, still depends on pre-t64 libraries
Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:35:34 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10320
Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet
Wed, 31 Dec 2025 02:04:04 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #10319
Bug#1124308: u-boot: remove gcc-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64 and gcc-mipsel-linux-gnu from Build-Depends-Indep
Tue, 30 Dec 2025 11:30:31 +0100
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10318
Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:17:17 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10317
Bug#1123073: RM: r-cran-projpred [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not built for 32 bit any more
Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:42:47 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10316
Bug#1123010: RM: roct-thunk-interface [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; limiting architecture to only amd64,arm64,ppc64el
Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:49:28 -0500
"M. Zhou" <[email protected]> • #10315
Bug#1122804: RM: r-cran-blme [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove for 32 bit architectures (architecture-is-64-bit was added to Build-Depends)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 16:01:25 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10314
Bug#1122205: RM: rhonabwy -- ROM; upstream is no longer maintained and depends on obsolete packages, FTBFS with gnutls 3.8.11
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 13:34:17 -0500
Nicolas Mora <[email protected]> • #10313
Bug#1121970: RM: r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove for 32 bit architectures (architecture-is-64-bit was added to Build-Depends)
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:54:03 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10312
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:01:10 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #10311
OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:28:28 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10310
Bug#1121732: RM: seqan2 [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Building on 32bit architectures prevented
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:18:05 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #10309
64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:31:03 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #10308
Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:18:58 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #10307
Re: 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:33:11 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #10306
gcc-16, first packaging bits
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 13:12:30 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10305
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 23:05:44 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #10304
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:27:20 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #10303
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #10302
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:42:08 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #10301
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 10:50:59 +0100
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #10300
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:49:27 -0600
Falco Girgis <[email protected]> • #10299
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:19:02 -0500
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #10298
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:57:25 +0100
Christopher Huhn <[email protected]> • #10297
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:56:58 +0100
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> • #10296
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:32:02 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #10295
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:48:43 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #10294
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Jaromír Cápík <[email protected]> • #10293
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:19:25 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #10292
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:20:01 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #10291
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:16:40 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #10290
Re: Bug#1113679: removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 21:20:34 +0100
Ansgar 🙀 <[email protected]> • #10289
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 01:04:52 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #10288
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:23:52 -0500
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #10287
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:35:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10286
Re: removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 14:44:11 +0100
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #10285
removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental
Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:03:56 +0100
Ansgar 🙀 <[email protected]> • #10284
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:58:04 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #10283
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:57:36 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #10282
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #10281
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:40:51 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #10280
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:24 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #10279
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:54 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #10278
AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #10277
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:48:20 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #10276
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:32:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #10275
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #10274
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:15:37 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #10273
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:07:07 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #10272
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:39:44 +0100
[email protected] • #10271
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:59:11 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #10270
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:06:25 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #10269
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:18:38 +0200
Sicelo <[email protected]> • #10268
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #10267
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:38:57 -0400
Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> • #10266
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:30 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #10265
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:13:45 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #10264
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:00:11 +0530
kiruthikaanbusuresh <[email protected]> • #10263
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:29 +0100
Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]> • #10262
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:06 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #10261
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:33:28 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #10260
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:55:50 +0100
Gerardo Ballabio <[email protected]> • #10259
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:45:30 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #10258
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 22:20:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #10257
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:51:01 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #10256
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:29:02 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #10255
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:15:57 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #10254
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:12:08 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #10253
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:22:17 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #10252
Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:21:29 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #10251
Bug#1117937: libcgns: test_particlef and cgwrite_f03 tests fail on many architectures
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 21:04:56 +0200
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #10250
Bug#1117486: telegram-desktop: Fails to build form source
Mon, 06 Oct 2025 10:46:23 -0300
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[email protected]> • #10249
Re: OpenSSL on mips64el
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:01:14 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #10248
OpenSSL on mips64el
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:34:50 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> • #10247
clang and linux headers on mips64el: /usr/include/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/asm/byteorder.h:17:3: error: "MIPS, but neither __MIPSEB__, nor __MIPSEL__???"
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:53:40 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #10246
Open Invoice #Acknowledgement for your records
Mon, 08 Sep 2025 11:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Lucas Davis <[email protected]> • #10245
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:47:52 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #10244
Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u2
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:07:39 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10243
Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u2
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:26:21 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10242
Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u1
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:55:09 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]> • #10241
Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u1
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:08:12 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10240
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:07:41 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #10239
Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 00:53:05 +0200
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #10238
qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update)
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #10237
Re: Bug#1105965: Remove mips64el from testing
Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:36:15 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #10236
Bug#1111671: openarena-server: Dedicated server segfaults during startup on mips64el, riscv64, s390x
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:16:04 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #10235
Bug#1102279: downgrading severity, no reply from the mips porters yet
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 05:17:48 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #10234
Bug#1110684: RM: rust-tiny-dfr [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; update only builds on arm64 and amd64
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:38:08 +0200
NoisyCoil <[email protected]> • #10233
Bug#1110684: RM: rust-tiny-dfr [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; update only builds on arm64 and amd64
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:51:24 +0200
NoisyCoil <[email protected]> • #10232
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.