gmane.linux.debian.ports.superh archive

390 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:52:39 +0100
Helge Deller <[email protected]> • #2597
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #2596
Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #2595
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:37 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #2594
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:15:45 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #2593
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #2592
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:31:35 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #2591
python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #2590
Re: timet64 ABI change for ports architectures
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:20:23 -0500
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #2589
Re: timet64 ABI change for ports architectures
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:49:37 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #2588
timet64 ABI change for ports architectures
Tue, 20 Feb 2024 05:09:23 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #2587
Re: Bug#1061133: libsoup3: Build profiles don't actually work
Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:53:02 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #2586
Re: Bug#1061133: libsoup3: Build profiles don't actually work
Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:34:24 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2585
Bug#1061133: libsoup3: Build profiles don't actually work
Fri, 19 Jan 2024 01:17:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2584
Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:35:52 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #2583
Bug#1054272: gcc-13: Regression in SH backend results in binutils FTBFS
Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:04:31 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2582
Re: Bug#1043225: qt6-base: Please add patch to re-enable support for SuperH (sh4)
Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:23:47 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2581
Bug#1043225: qt6-base: Please add patch to re-enable support for SuperH (sh4)
Mon, 07 Aug 2023 17:41:04 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2580
Bug#1042519: webkit2gtk: Please update CFLAGS for sh4 to fix FTBFS
Sat, 29 Jul 2023 18:51:02 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2579
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:25:10 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2578
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:08:17 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #2577
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 17:26:25 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2576
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:09:38 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2575
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:53:48 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2574
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:04:03 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2573
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:25:11 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2572
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:22:43 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2571
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:07:47 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2570
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:02:54 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2569
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:34:53 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2568
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:28:15 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2567
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:25:09 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2566
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:38:29 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2565
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:36:42 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2564
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:35:46 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2563
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:27:11 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2562
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:02:34 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #2561
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:09:38 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2560
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:10:09 -0400
"Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]> • #2559
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:14:04 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #2558
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 02:11:19 +0100
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> • #2557
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:03:28 +1000 (AEST)
Finn Thain <[email protected]> • #2556
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:53:46 -0700
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> • #2555
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:37:32 +0100
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> • #2554
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:20:56 +1000
Dave Chinner <[email protected]> • #2553
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:38:52 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #2552
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:27:50 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #2551
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:59:50 +0100
Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> • #2550
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:50:47 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2549
Re: Bug#1018881: glibc: iconv not working properly on m68k and sh4
Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:25:10 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #2548
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:29:48 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #2547
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:55:29 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2546
LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:31:29 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2545
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 25 Jun 2023 13:37:19 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2544
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:15:14 +0800
Paul Wise <[email protected]> • #2543
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:46:42 +0200
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #2542
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:35:55 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2541
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:52:57 +0200
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #2540
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:46:59 +0100
Kirsten Bromilow <[email protected]> • #2539
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:25:09 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #2538
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:07:48 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #2537
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 05:52:44 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2536
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 05:50:35 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2535
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 02:27:56 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #2534
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 18:03:42 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #2533
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:19:46 +0300
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #2532
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 23:29:34 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2531
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 02:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> • #2530
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 17:14:07 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #2529
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:04:45 +0200
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #2528
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 16:37:55 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #2527
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:19:38 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2526
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 21:58:14 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2525
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 14:28:15 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #2524
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 14:11:20 +0200
Omer Turpault <[email protected]> • #2523
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 12:36:03 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #2522
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:45:57 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2521
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:32:55 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2520
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:19:28 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2519
unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 09:31:05 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2518
LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:25:53 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #2517
Bug#1027168: onetbb: Please add patch to fix FTBFS on sh4
Wed, 28 Dec 2022 20:18:04 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2516
Re: Bug#1026362: RFS: binutils-sh-elf/2 -- GNU binary utilities for embedded SuperH devices
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:39:17 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2515
Re: Bug#1026308: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/5 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:33:56 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2514
Bug#1026362: RFS: binutils-sh-elf/2 -- GNU binary utilities for embedded SuperH devices
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 01:08:40 +0000
John Scott <[email protected]> • #2513
Re: Bug#1026308: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/5 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:06:49 +0000
John Scott <[email protected]> • #2512
Re: Bug#1026308: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/5 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Sun, 18 Dec 2022 08:49:20 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2511
Re: Bug#1026308: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/5 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Sun, 18 Dec 2022 07:17:52 +0000
John Scott <[email protected]> • #2510
Re: Bug#1026308: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/5 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Sun, 18 Dec 2022 08:09:08 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2509
Bug#1026308: RFS: gcc-sh-elf/5 -- GNU C compiler for embedded SuperH devices
Sun, 18 Dec 2022 05:22:03 +0000
John Scott <[email protected]> • #2508
Re: Bug#1025176: libicu71 missing on SH4 port
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:50:48 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #2507
Bug#1025176: libicu71 missing on SH4 port
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:43:33 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #2506
Re: Bug#1025176: libicu71 missing on SH4 port
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 20:35:09 -0600
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #2505
Re: Bug#1025176: libicu71 missing on SH4 port
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 20:02:34 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2504
Re: Bug#1025176: libicu71 missing on SH4 port
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:28:35 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2503
Bug#1025176: libicu71 missing on SH4 port
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:15:40 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #2502
Cloud Store, tous les services pour le télétravail et le travail hybride
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 15:49:04 +0000
"Cloud Store" <[email protected]> • #2501
Bug#1023554: glibc: Please build with "--disable-default-pie" on sh3 and sh4 to workaround glibc bug
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 16:13:43 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2500
Re: Bug#1018881: glibc: iconv not working properly on m68k and sh4
Sun, 4 Sep 2022 08:03:39 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #2499
Re: Bug#1018881: glibc: iconv not working properly on m68k and sh4
Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:43:58 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #2498
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.