gmane.linux.elitists archive

350 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Mon, 1 Jan 2018 00:35:52 -0500
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14058
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 18:22:47 -0800
Rick Moen <[email protected]> • #14057
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Mon, 01 Jan 2018 02:05:34 +0000
[email protected] • #14056
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Mon, 01 Jan 2018 02:03:36 +0000
[email protected] • #14055
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 18:00:59 -0800
Rick Moen <[email protected]> • #14054
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Mon, 01 Jan 2018 01:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
Aaron Burt <[email protected]> • #14053
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:04:20 -0800
Seth David Schoen <[email protected]> • #14052
Re: DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:36:40 +0000
[email protected] • #14051
DMCA to-do failure, turning the list off
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 16:25:35 -0800
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #14050
Re: 100% Linux on the Top500 supercomputer list
Sun, 3 Dec 2017 03:24:06 -0500
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14049
Re: Linux Journal, April 1994 - November 2017
Sun, 3 Dec 2017 03:17:16 -0500
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14048
Re: 100% Linux on the Top500 supercomputer list
Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:26:57 +0200
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #14047
Re: Linux Journal, April 1994 - November 2017
Sat, 2 Dec 2017 18:53:45 +0200
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #14046
Re: Linux Journal, April 1994 - November 2017
Sat, 2 Dec 2017 08:30:45 -0800
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #14045
Re: Linux Journal, April 1994 - November 2017
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:48:42 +0000
Andy Bennett <[email protected]> • #14044
Linux Journal, April 1994 - November 2017
Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:21:31 -0800
Rick Moen <[email protected]> • #14043
Re: 100% Linux on the Top500 supercomputer list
Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:19:57 +0000 (UTC)
Aaron Burt <[email protected]> • #14042
Re: 100% Linux on the Top500 supercomputer list
Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:46:45 -0800
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]> • #14041
100% Linux on the Top500 supercomputer list
Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:43:45 +0100
Øyvind A. Holm <[email protected]> • #14040
Re: December 31 - Deadline for DMCA Agent Designation
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:55:34 -0800
Rick Moen <[email protected]> • #14039
December 31 - Deadline for DMCA Agent Designation
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:52:07 +0000
[email protected] • #14038
Re: Fw: [dev] save the code
Wed, 04 Oct 2017 18:54:20 +0000
[email protected] • #14037
Fw: [dev] save the code
Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:39:06 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #14036
Unix Timestamp 1,500,000,000
Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:52:24 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #14035
Re: Farewell Advogato
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:16:18 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #14034
Re: Farewell Advogato
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:34:48 +0200
Tomasz Rola <[email protected]> • #14033
Re: Farewell Advogato
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:20:08 +1000 (AEST)
James Morris <[email protected]> • #14032
Farewell Advogato
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:42:16 +0000
[email protected] • #14031
[ANN] fortune-mod-1.99.3 - new release since 2004 by a new upstream
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 19:53:29 +0200
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #14030
Happy news on sofware patents?
Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:13:13 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #14029
The un-tracking pixel
Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:36:06 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #14028
"one of the worst patch series submissions in history"
Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:59:17 +1000 (AEST)
James Morris <[email protected]> • #14027
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sat, 2 Jul 2016 22:48:30 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14026
Apropos Nothing At All
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:06:21 +0100
Andy Bennett <[email protected]> • #14025
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 29 May 2016 20:17:31 +0000
"D. Joe" <[email protected]> • #14024
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 29 May 2016 20:14:47 +0000
"D. Joe" <[email protected]> • #14023
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 10:21:19 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #14022
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 15:21:22 -0400
Rik van Riel <[email protected]> • #14021
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 17:35:46 +0000
"D. Joe" <[email protected]> • #14020
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 17:48:37 +0200
Tomasz Rola <[email protected]> • #14019
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 01:40:31 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14018
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 01:14:43 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14017
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 21:52:00 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #14016
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 21:47:03 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #14015
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 26 May 2016 03:22:56 +0000
"D. Joe" <[email protected]> • #14014
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 17:45:55 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14013
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 12:30:52 +0000
"D. Joe" <[email protected]> • #14012
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 00:01:14 -0700
Ed Carp <[email protected]> • #14011
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:37:35 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #14010
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:10:34 -0700
Ed Carp <[email protected]> • #14009
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 00:14:07 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14008
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:57:26 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #14007
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Wed, 25 May 2016 01:00:54 +0200
Tomasz Rola <[email protected]> • #14006
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 24 May 2016 10:56:04 -0400
Rik van Riel <[email protected]> • #14005
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 24 May 2016 15:24:45 +0200
Tomasz Rola <[email protected]> • #14004
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 23 May 2016 21:19:00 -0400
Rik van Riel <[email protected]> • #14003
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 24 May 2016 02:37:49 +0200
Tomasz Rola <[email protected]> • #14002
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 23 May 2016 16:18:17 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #14001
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 23 May 2016 23:51:53 +0200
Tomasz Rola <[email protected]> • #14000
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Thu, 19 May 2016 10:23:53 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13999
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 19:50:04 +0000
Teh Entar-Nick <[email protected]> • #13998
Re: Fwd: confirm 43a77839d0942b57876b4798604552febe6a3ad9
Tue, 17 May 2016 19:39:46 +0000
Teh Entar-Nick <[email protected]> • #13997
Re: Nice try kiddies
Tue, 17 May 2016 19:38:04 +0000
Teh Entar-Nick <[email protected]> • #13996
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 07:37:49 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13995
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 07:19:27 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #13994
Re: Fwd: confirm 43a77839d0942b57876b4798604552febe6a3ad9
Tue, 17 May 2016 08:10:19 -0500
Tilghman Lesher <[email protected]> • #13993
Re: Fwd: confirm 43a77839d0942b57876b4798604552febe6a3ad9
Tue, 17 May 2016 02:10:30 -0700
Rick Moen <[email protected]> • #13992
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 04:50:57 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13991
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 04:41:11 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13990
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 04:37:29 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13989
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 04:35:22 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13988
Fwd: confirm 43a77839d0942b57876b4798604552febe6a3ad9
Tue, 17 May 2016 04:18:39 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13987
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Tue, 17 May 2016 04:17:56 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13986
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 23:41:13 -0500
Jim Thompson <[email protected]> • #13985
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 21:30:23 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #13984
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 20:26:13 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13983
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 22:32:36 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13982
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 16:18:13 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13981
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 17:08:58 -0500
/dev/rob0 <[email protected]> • #13980
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 18:05:19 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13979
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 18:02:15 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13978
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 17:55:59 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13977
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 13:26:34 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #13976
Re: Nice try kiddies
Mon, 16 May 2016 11:54:00 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #13975
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 12:39:58 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13974
Re: Nice try kiddies
Mon, 16 May 2016 15:06:31 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13973
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 15:03:41 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13972
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 14:58:54 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13971
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Mon, 16 May 2016 11:46:27 -0500
/dev/rob0 <[email protected]> • #13970
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 11:32:15 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13969
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 11:29:29 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13968
Nice try kiddies
Sun, 15 May 2016 11:18:59 -0700
Greg KH <[email protected]> • #13967
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 20:51:28 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13966
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 17:04:35 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #13965
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 19:42:00 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13964
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 10:18:13 -0700
Don Marti <[email protected]> • #13963
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 05:57:35 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13962
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 05:28:35 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13961
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 05:22:24 -0400
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> • #13960
Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Sun, 15 May 2016 00:35:54 -0700
Ed Carp <[email protected]> • #13959
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.