gmane.linux.gentoo.java archive

425 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: [gentoo-java][PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development
Sat, 18 Apr 2020 17:07:38 +0100
Samuel Bernardo <[email protected]> • #2244
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development
Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:06:45 +0800
Benda Xu <[email protected]> • #2243
[gentoo-java][PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development
Fri, 10 Apr 2020 16:23:03 +0100
Samuel Bernardo <[email protected]> • #2242
Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Wed, 30 May 2018 10:56:47 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]> • #2241
[PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Wed, 30 May 2018 03:03:18 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2240
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Wed, 30 May 2018 09:52:27 +0200
Patrice Clement <[email protected]> • #2239
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Tue, 22 May 2018 13:28:50 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]> • #2238
Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Tue, 22 May 2018 07:56:51 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <[email protected]> • #2237
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Tue, 22 May 2018 02:04:25 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2236
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Tue, 22 May 2018 01:59:51 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2235
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Tue, 22 May 2018 08:27:27 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]> • #2234
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Mon, 21 May 2018 23:01:10 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2233
Re: Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Tue, 22 May 2018 05:57:35 +0200
Michał Górny <[email protected]> • #2232
Re: [PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Mon, 21 May 2018 17:03:06 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2231
[PATCH] ant-tasks.eclass: use eapi7-ver
Mon, 21 May 2018 16:34:55 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2230
[PATCH] java-vm-2.eclass: fdo-mime->xdg-utils migration
Sun, 8 Apr 2018 05:25:35 -0500
"Marty E. Plummer" <[email protected]> • #2229
Re: Generation of ebuilds with maven build system
Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:52:49 +0900
Benda Xu <[email protected]> • #2228
Re: Generation of ebuilds with maven build system
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:29:00 +0200
"Harald Weiner" <[email protected]> • #2227
Re: Generation of ebuilds with maven build system
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:24:36 +0900
Benda Xu <[email protected]> • #2226
Re: Generation of ebuilds with maven build system
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:15:48 -0500
Austin English <[email protected]> • #2225
Re: Generation of ebuilds with maven build system
Sun, 02 Oct 2016 22:44:53 +0200
"Harald Weiner" <[email protected]> • #2224
Generation of ebuilds with maven build system
Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:09:48 +0900
Benda Xu <[email protected]> • #2223
Re: kactivitymanagerd endless update loop
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 17:28:56 +0100
James Le Cuirot <[email protected]> • #2222
kactivitymanagerd endless update loop
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:03:08 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2221
Re: Emerging Tomcat without Eclipse
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:48:12 +0000
Matthew Smith <[email protected]> • #2220
Re: Emerging Tomcat without Eclipse
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:22:39 +0000
James Le Cuirot <[email protected]> • #2219
Re: Emerging Tomcat without Eclipse
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:14:12 -0200
Claudio Roberto França Pereira <[email protected]> • #2218
Re: Emerging Tomcat without Eclipse
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:09:47 +0000
Matthew Smith <[email protected]> • #2217
Re: Emerging Tomcat without Eclipse
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:02:32 +0000
James Le Cuirot <[email protected]> • #2216
Emerging Tomcat without Eclipse
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:43:13 +0000
Matthew Smith <[email protected]> • #2215
Artifactory packaging update
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:21:56 -0600
Austin English <[email protected]> • #2214
Re: Fwd: packaging project built with gradle
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 06:39:04 -0600
Nicolas Bock <[email protected]> • #2213
Re: Fwd: packaging project built with gradle
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 05:37:41 +0200
"Johann Schmitz (ercpe)" <[email protected]> • #2212
Fwd: packaging project built with gradle
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:28:15 -0600
Nicolas Bock <[email protected]> • #2211
new ebuilds
Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:49:26 +0200
Simon Maurer <[email protected]> • #2210
Re: java-config --classpath on slotted library
Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:12:19 -0700
Nicolas Bock <[email protected]> • #2209
Re: java-config --classpath on slotted library
Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:59:14 +0000
James Le Cuirot <chewi-Yn+4UywRBy5n8C+U7lyxXlpr/1R2p/[email protected]> • #2208
java-config --classpath on slotted library
Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:50:40 -0700
Nicolas Bock <[email protected]> • #2207
Re: XulRunner for SWT
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:34:15 -0400
Mansour Al Akeel <[email protected]> • #2206
Re: XulRunner for SWT
Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:38:19 +0200
Florian Philipp <[email protected]> • #2205
XulRunner for SWT
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 02:09:22 -0400
Mansour Al Akeel <[email protected]> • #2204
Re: Packaging scm-manager
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:22:01 -0500
Taahir Ahmed <[email protected]> • #2203
Re: Packaging scm-manager
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 08:04:02 +0100
James Le Cuirot <chewi-Yn+4UywRBy5n8C+U7lyxXlpr/1R2p/[email protected]> • #2202
Re: Packaging scm-manager
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 02:58:16 +0200
[email protected] • #2201
Packaging scm-manager
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:48:24 -0500
Taahir Ahmed <[email protected]> • #2200
Re: Depending on dev-java/icedtea-bin[X]
Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:13:40 -0400
"W. Trevor King" <[email protected]> • #2199
Re: Depending on dev-java/icedtea-bin[X]
Sat, 07 Jul 2012 15:13:17 +0200
Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> • #2198
Depending on dev-java/icedtea-bin[X]
Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:11:01 -0500
"W. Trevor King" <[email protected]> • #2197
Build from source and Maven project model
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:59:35 +0100
Paweł Cesar Sanjuan Szklarz <[email protected]> • #2196
Call for participation: Free Java @ FOSDEM 2012
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:20:59 +0100
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> • #2195
Stepping down as team leaded
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:28:55 +0300
Petteri Räty <[email protected]> • #2194
Future of emul-linux-x86-java package
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:00:06 +0300
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2193
Gentoo Maven Integration - Final Report
Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:23:33 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2191
Re: Re: need help to update Java Wiki page
Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:12:04 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2190
Re: need help to update Java Wiki page
Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:24:39 +0300
Petteri Räty <[email protected]> • #2189
need help to update Java Wiki page
Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:21:55 +0800
Kyle Pan <[email protected]> • #2188
Gentoo Maven Integration - Weekly Report #6
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:24:12 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2187
Re: Re: [mvn-intg] maven-from-source : An issue when invoking mvn
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:45:47 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2186
Re: Re: [mvn-intg] maven-from-source : An issue when invoking mvn
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:05:59 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2185
Re: Re: [mvn-intg] maven-from-source : An issue when invoking mvn
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:59:29 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2184
Re: [mvn-intg] maven-from-source : An issue when invoking mvn
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:16:01 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2183
[mvn-intg] maven-from-source : An issue when invoking mvn
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:29:06 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2182
Gentoo Maven Integration - Weekly Report #3
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:31:36 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2181
Re: Building an open source NetBeans
Thu, 26 May 2011 20:14:24 +0200
"Nico R." <[email protected]> • #2180
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 18:25:32 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2179
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 18:18:19 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2178
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:15 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2177
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 17:57:45 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2176
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 12:10:28 +0100
Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> • #2175
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 11:58:18 +0100
Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> • #2174
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 14:36:57 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2173
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Thu, 26 May 2011 09:44:26 +0100
Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> • #2172
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Wed, 25 May 2011 18:09:19 +0200
Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> • #2171
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Wed, 25 May 2011 15:33:39 +0100
Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> • #2170
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Tue, 24 May 2011 17:22:36 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2169
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Tue, 24 May 2011 12:07:10 +0300
Petteri Räty <[email protected]> • #2168
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Mon, 23 May 2011 22:22:16 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2167
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Mon, 23 May 2011 09:38:12 +0300
Petteri Räty <[email protected]> • #2166
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Mon, 23 May 2011 11:45:56 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2165
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Mon, 23 May 2011 00:54:02 +0300
Petteri Räty <[email protected]> • #2164
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Sun, 22 May 2011 16:54:45 +0200
Eric Chatellier <[email protected]> • #2163
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:27 +0200
kiorky <kiorky-MqBBU/[email protected]> • #2162
Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Sun, 22 May 2011 11:08:23 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2161
Re: Re: Java/Gentoo IDE integration-------about Jython version
Wed, 11 May 2011 09:13:38 +0800
Kyle Pan <[email protected]> • #2160
Re: Re: Java/Gentoo IDE integration-------about Jython version
Tue, 10 May 2011 21:50:49 +0300
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2159
Re: Building an open source NetBeans
Tue, 10 May 2011 17:28:45 +0200
"Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <[email protected]> • #2158
Building an open source NetBeans
Tue, 10 May 2011 16:57:58 +0200
"Nico R." <[email protected]> • #2157
Re: Re: Java/Gentoo IDE integration-------about Jython version
Sun, 08 May 2011 18:37:35 +0300
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2156
Re: Java/Gentoo IDE integration-------about Jython version
Sun, 8 May 2011 23:10:09 +0800
Kyle Pan <[email protected]> • #2155
[GSoC] Java Eclipse integration
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 06:18:41 +0200
Bernd Bergler <[email protected]> • #2154
Re: [GSoC] Maven integration for Gentoo ebuilds
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:17:26 +0530
Kasun Gajasinghe <[email protected]> • #2153
Re: XOM ebuild
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:03:44 +1300
Alistair Bush <[email protected]> • #2152
Re: XOM ebuild
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:48:03 +0200
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2151
Re: XOM ebuild
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:52:11 +1300
Alistair Bush <[email protected]> • #2150
XOM ebuild
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:59:29 +0200
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2149
Re: Fwd: [gentoo-project] Request for package inclusion into upcoming Gentoo 11.0 LiveUSB
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:43:29 +0100
Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> • #2148
Re: Fwd: [gentoo-project] Request for package inclusion into upcoming Gentoo 11.0 LiveUSB
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:56:51 +0200
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2147
Re: Fwd: [gentoo-project] Request for package inclusion into upcoming Gentoo 11.0 LiveUSB
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:07:46 +1300
Alistair Bush <[email protected]> • #2146
Fwd: [gentoo-project] Request for package inclusion into upcoming Gentoo 11.0 LiveUSB
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:11:07 +0200
Serkan Kaba <[email protected]> • #2145
Re: News item: Dropping Java support on ia64 (retry)
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:21:31 +0100
Sebastian Pipping <[email protected]> • #2144
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.