gmane.linux.gentoo.user.hungarian archive

374 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Re: Kernel Panic
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:31:59 +0200
Gábor Garami <[email protected]> • #2754
Re: Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:29:42 +0100
Testa <[email protected]> • #2753
Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:03:09 +0200
Szellem Tamás <[email protected]> • #2752
Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:11:47 +0200
Szellem Tamás <[email protected]> • #2751
Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:01:31 +0100
Testa <[email protected]> • #2750
Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:57:58 +0100
Testa <[email protected]> • #2749
Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:00:56 +0200
dragon <[email protected]> • #2748
RE: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:32:42 +0000
Gelle István <[email protected]> • #2747
Re: Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:22:01 +0200
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2746
Kernel Panic
Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:14:03 +0200
Szellem Tamás <[email protected]> • #2745
Re: xfce 4.8 - eclipse - C-c C-p
Mon, 30 May 2011 13:20:10 +0200
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2744
Re: xfce 4.8 - eclipse - C-c C-p
Mon, 30 May 2011 11:11:15 +0000
Lóránd Lucz <[email protected]> • #2743
xfce 4.8 - eclipse - C-c C-p
Mon, 30 May 2011 12:46:08 +0200
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2742
Re: dbus vs kdm
Sat, 21 May 2011 11:36:19 +0200
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2741
Re: dbus vs kdm
Sat, 21 May 2011 09:59:46 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2740
Re: dbus vs kdm
Sat, 21 May 2011 09:30:09 +0200
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2739
Re: dbus vs kdm
Sat, 21 May 2011 09:16:26 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2738
Re: dbus vs kdm
Thu, 19 May 2011 20:04:39 +0200
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2737
dbus vs kdm
Thu, 19 May 2011 17:09:59 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2736
Re: nspluginwrapper-flash 32/64
Tue, 10 May 2011 19:33:05 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2735
Re: nspluginwrapper-flash 32/64
Tue, 10 May 2011 19:16:19 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2734
Re: nspluginwrapper-flash 32/64
Tue, 10 May 2011 16:19:25 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2733
RE: nspluginwrapper-flash 32/64
Tue, 10 May 2011 14:10:33 +0000
Gelle István <[email protected]> • #2732
nspluginwrapper-flash 32/64
Tue, 10 May 2011 15:58:36 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2731
kopete facebook
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:35:09 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2730
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:00:50 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2729
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat 26 Feb 2011 10:30:54 -0700
[email protected] • #2728
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:30:56 +0100
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2727
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat 26 Feb 2011 07:20:59 -0700
[email protected] • #2726
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:20:57 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2725
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat 26 Feb 2011 05:55:34 -0700
[email protected] • #2724
Re: ooffice ? bug
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:54:19 +0100
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2723
Re: help....
Sun 13 Feb 2011 09:39:10 -0700
[email protected] • #2722
Re: help....
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:37:20 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2721
Re: help....
Sun 13 Feb 2011 02:16:55 -0700
[email protected] • #2720
Re: help....
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:14:18 +0100
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2719
Re: help....
Wed 09 Feb 2011 15:09:22 -0700
[email protected] • #2718
Re: help....
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:08:09 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2717
Re: help....
Wed 09 Feb 2011 03:29:35 -0700
[email protected] • #2716
Re: help....
Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:28:37 +0100
sagal <[email protected]> • #2715
Re: help....
Wed 09 Feb 2011 01:02:37 -0700
[email protected] • #2714
help....
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:00:43 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2713
Re: ooffice ? bug
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:14:42 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2712
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu 03 Feb 2011 09:38:16 -0700
[email protected] • #2711
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:37:21 +0100
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2710
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:37:13 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2709
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu 03 Feb 2011 09:24:53 -0700
[email protected] • #2708
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:23:15 +0100
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2707
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:18:23 +0000
Testa <[email protected]> • #2706
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu 03 Feb 2011 07:11:51 -0700
[email protected] • #2705
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:09:50 +0100
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2704
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu 03 Feb 2011 07:04:27 -0700
[email protected] • #2703
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:03:08 +0100
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2702
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu 03 Feb 2011 06:49:18 -0700
[email protected] • #2701
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:47:00 +0100
Bukuli Norbert <[email protected]> • #2700
Re: ooffice ? bug
Thu 03 Feb 2011 06:42:13 -0700
[email protected] • #2699
ooffice ? bug
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:39:54 +0100
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2698
Re: unsubscribe
Fri 15 Oct 2010 05:21:41 -0700
[email protected] • #2697
Re: unsubscribe
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:19:42 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2696
Re: unsubscribe
Fri 01 Oct 2010 11:27:19 -0700
[email protected] • #2695
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Wed 29 Sep 2010 03:55:29 -0700
[email protected] • #2694
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:52:07 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2693
Re: unsubscribe
Wed 29 Sep 2010 03:51:01 -0700
[email protected] • #2692
Re: unsubscribe
Wed 29 Sep 2010 03:50:59 -0700
[email protected] • #2691
Re: unsubscribe
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:48:50 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2690
Re: unsubscribe
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:49:05 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2689
Re: unsubscribe
Fri 17 Sep 2010 15:17:31 -0700
[email protected] • #2688
Re: unsubscribe
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:15:27 +0200
Testa <[email protected]> • #2687
Re: unsubscribe
Fri 17 Sep 2010 09:24:24 -0700
[email protected] • #2686
Re:
Sat 11 Sep 2010 12:00:27 -0700
[email protected] • #2685
(unknown)
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:58:43 +0200
Simon László <[email protected]> • #2684
Re: cups + fax
Tue 31 Aug 2010 10:06:35 -0700
[email protected] • #2683
Re: cups + fax
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:41:58 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2682
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:37:39 +0200
Testa <[email protected]> • #2681
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu 26 Aug 2010 22:50:09 -0700
[email protected] • #2680
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:47:59 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2679
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu 26 Aug 2010 16:45:20 -0700
[email protected] • #2678
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:23:47 +0200
[email protected] (Vida Gábor) • #2677
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu 26 Aug 2010 13:37:18 -0700
[email protected] • #2676
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:34:14 +0200
Pintér Tibor <[email protected]> • #2675
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu 26 Aug 2010 13:33:01 -0700
[email protected] • #2674
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:28:48 +0200
Pintér Tibor <[email protected]> • #2673
Re: perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu 26 Aug 2010 12:36:41 -0700
[email protected] • #2672
perl NET-SMTP(-Server) csomag
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:34:47 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2671
Re: cups + fax
Sun 22 Aug 2010 13:04:56 -0700
[email protected] • #2670
Re: cups + fax
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:02:24 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2669
Re: cups + fax
Sun 22 Aug 2010 12:41:26 -0700
[email protected] • #2668
Re: cups + fax
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:40:14 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2667
Re: cups + fax
Thu 29 Jul 2010 08:52:03 -0700
[email protected] • #2666
Re: cups + fax
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:50:14 +0200
Testa <[email protected]> • #2665
Re: cups + fax
Thu 29 Jul 2010 08:00:06 -0700
[email protected] • #2664
Re: cups + fax
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:57:59 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2663
Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: CD eject probléma
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:55:30 +0200
Gabor Garami <[email protected]> • #2662
Re: cups + fax
Sat 24 Jul 2010 03:20:14 -0400
[email protected] • #2661
cups + fax
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:18:50 +0200
cjvt <[email protected]> • #2660
Re: Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: gentoo mellé XP és
Mon 19 Jul 2010 23:06:31 -0400
[email protected] • #2659
Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gento o-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: gentoo mellé XP és
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:53:47 +0200
Ruzsinszky Attila <[email protected]> • #2658
Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gento o-user-hu] Re: gentoo mellé XP és
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:51:43 +0200
Testa <[email protected]> • #2657
Re: Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: gentoo mellé XP és
Mon 19 Jul 2010 11:04:56 -0400
[email protected] • #2656
Re: Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: [gentoo-user-hu] Re: gentoo mellé XP és
Mon 19 Jul 2010 11:04:54 -0400
[email protected] • #2655
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.