gmane.linux.jpackage.general archive

998 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 10). Latest articles →

Re: broken RPM for Centos5
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:32:33 +0200
Xavier Poinsard <[email protected]> • #15370
broken RPM for Centos5
Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:27:29 +0200
Xavier Poinsard <[email protected]> • #15369
jpackage repo broken / mirrors
Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:18:38 +1200
Vladimir Mencl <vladimir.mencl-F+z8Qja7x9Xokq/[email protected]> • #15368
unsigned packages - again
Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:53:52 +1200
Vladimir Mencl <vladimir.mencl-F+z8Qja7x9Xokq/[email protected]> • #15367
unsigned packages
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:53:43 +0000
Richard Newton <Richard.Newton-xM16eKyGSYBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #15366
unsigned packages
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:53:43 +0000
Richard Newton <Richard.Newton-xM16eKyGSYBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #15365
Re: [centos] Package msv is obsoleted by relaxngDatatype, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:45:21 +0200
Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]> • #15364
Re: [centos] Package msv is obsoleted by relaxngDatatype, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:20:50 -0500
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15363
[centos] Package msv is obsoleted by relaxngDatatype, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:43:14 +0200
Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]> • #15362
Re: jpackage-utils from jpackage-5.0-generic does not work with java-1.7.0-openjdk
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:15:53 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #15361
jpackage-utils from jpackage-5.0-generic does not work with java-1.7.0-openjdk
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 12:02:22 +0000 (UTC)
Tomas Lestach <[email protected]> • #15360
Re: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:07:47 -0400 (EDT)
Andrew Hughes <[email protected]> • #15359
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/fedora
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:37:40 +0200
Jacob Wisor <[email protected]> • #15358
Re: apache-commons-codec-1.8-1.jpp6.noarch.rpm is not signed
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:21:25 +0200
john <[email protected]> • #15357
Re: apache-commons-codec-1.8-1.jpp6.noarch.rpm is not signed
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15356
apache-commons-codec-1.8-1.jpp6.noarch.rpm is not signed
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:14:21 +0200
john <[email protected]> • #15355
jpackage.org website issues
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:05:17 -0400
Jeff Bachtel <[email protected]> • #15354
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:53:38 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15353
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:25:13 -0400
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15352
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 18:03:36 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15351
Re: A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:53:36 -0400
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15350
A good idea from Ville about docdirs
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 16:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
Fernando Nasser <[email protected]> • #15349
Re: [JPackage-announce] [RPM (6.0)] maven-plugin-tools3-3.2-2.jpp6
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:57:09 -0400
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #15348
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 13 Apr 2013 00:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15346
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:06:54 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15345
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:16:39 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15344
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15343
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 9 Apr 2013 00:10:45 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15342
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15341
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 00:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15340
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 6 Apr 2013 00:10:38 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15339
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 00:08:03 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15338
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 4 Apr 2013 00:07:56 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15337
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 3 Apr 2013 00:08:15 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15336
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:17 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15335
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:07:12 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #15334
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:07:43 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15333
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:07:53 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15332
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:08:16 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15331
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:08:08 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15330
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:08:34 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15329
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:08:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15328
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:07:14 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15327
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 00:08:30 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15326
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:08:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15325
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:10:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15324
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:08:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15323
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:08:27 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15322
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:08:50 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15321
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:07:53 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15320
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:08:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15319
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 16 Mar 2013 00:08:58 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15318
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:08:40 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15317
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:10:20 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15316
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:08:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15315
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:08:55 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15314
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:07:25 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15313
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:10:12 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15312
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 9 Mar 2013 00:08:49 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15311
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:09:04 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15310
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:09:06 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15309
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 6 Mar 2013 00:09:33 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15308
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 5 Mar 2013 00:48:43 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15307
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 00:08:05 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15306
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:09:13 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15305
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 2 Mar 2013 00:09:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15304
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 1 Mar 2013 00:10:56 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15303
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:09:33 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15302
Re: broken dependencies because rpms are in other or development repos
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:50:38 +0000
Will Tatam <[email protected]> • #15301
Re: jpackage-release-6-1 rpm link missing from website
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:05:56 +0000
Will Tatam <[email protected]> • #15300
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:09:35 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15299
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:08:51 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15298
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:08:26 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15297
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:14:00 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15296
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:08:38 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15295
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:08:52 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15294
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:10:10 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15293
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:09:03 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15292
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:09:28 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15291
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:08:09 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15290
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:07:47 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15289
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:08:11 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15288
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:08:02 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15287
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:07:49 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15286
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:09:40 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15285
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:09:10 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15284
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:08:54 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15283
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:11:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15282
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:11:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15281
Re: jpackage-release-6-1 rpm link missing from website
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:13:03 -0800
Matthew Sacks <[email protected]> • #15280
Re: broken dependencies because rpms are in other or development repos
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:12:31 -0800
Matthew Sacks <[email protected]> • #15279
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:07:53 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15278
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 00:09:57 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15277
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:07:40 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15276
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 5 Feb 2013 00:11:42 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15275
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:17:21 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15274
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 00:09:23 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15273
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 00:10:26 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15272
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:09:02 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #15271
Re: jpackage-release-6-1 rpm link missing from website
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:34:34 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #15270
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.