gmane.linux.lsb.discuss archive

373 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: Query regarding LSB 2.0 compliance
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:01:35 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #1002
Query regarding LSB 2.0 compliance
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:16:36 -0800 (PST)
"krishna chaitanya d.v" <[email protected]> • #1001
RE: [Lsb-wg] LSB F2f Meeting reminder: Dec 6-8
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:51:53 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #1000
Re: [Lsb-wg] LSB F2f Meeting reminder: Dec 6-8
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:35:47 +0530
Pradosh Adoni <[email protected]> • #999
Re: Sun's support for Linux
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:38:04 +0000
[email protected] • #998
Sun's support for Linux
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:19:12 -0700
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> • #997
LSB F2f Meeting reminder: Dec 6-8
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:03:54 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #996
Re: Plan to launch LSB-XML Dec 1st
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:43:29 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #995
RE: Plan to launch LSB-XML Dec 1st
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:36:11 -0800
"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> • #994
Plan to launch LSB-XML Dec 1st
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:17:45 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #993
LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? (forwarded from (fwd)
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:52:31 -0800
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> • #992
LSB-Core 3.1 Specification Release Candidate
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:30:39 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #991
PKCS#11 standardisation
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:55:02 +0200
Philipp Gühring <[email protected]> • #990
Re: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:06:48 -0600
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> • #989
Re: KDE representation
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:58:49 +0200
Olaf Jan Schmidt <[email protected]> • #988
RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:03:26 -0700
"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> • #987
Re: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:14:03 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #986
RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:45:16 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #985
RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:32:22 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #984
RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:49:17 -0700
"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> • #983
RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:06:59 -0700
"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> • #982
Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:18:25 -0600
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> • #981
Re: KDE representation
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:38:01 +0200
Olaf Schmidt <[email protected]> • #980
LSB Chairmanship update
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:34:57 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #979
Re: [lsb-futures] Re: KDE representation
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:07:37 -0600
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> • #978
Re: KDE representation
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:27:06 +0200
Olaf Schmidt <[email protected]> • #977
Re: RE: [Lsb-desktop] KDE representation
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:41:18 -0400
"Christopher Yeoh" <[email protected]> • #976
RE: [Lsb-desktop] KDE representation
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:26:08 -0700
"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> • #975
KDE representation
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:23:02 +0200
Olaf Schmidt <[email protected]> • #974
RE: standardized C++ apps?
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 06:58:53 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #973
Final Reminder: LSB Plenary Meeting August 8, San Fransisco
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 06:56:05 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #972
RE: standardized C++ apps?
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 05:22:56 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #971
Re: standardized C++ apps?
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:35:49 -0500
Karl Pietrzak <[email protected]> • #970
RE: standardized C++ apps?
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:13:44 -0700
"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[email protected]> • #969
Re: standardized C++ apps?
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:55:43 -0500
Karl Pietrzak <[email protected]> • #968
Re: standardized C++ apps?
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Jack <[email protected]> • #967
standardized C++ apps?
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:59:32 -0400
"Karol Pietrzak \(RIT Student\)" <[email protected]> • #966
Re: [Lsb-wg] LSB specification (or not) of /etc/init.d
Fri, 06 May 2005 13:26:21 -0700
Nick Stoughton <[email protected]> • #965
Re: LSB specification (or not) of /etc/init.d
Fri, 6 May 2005 13:42:12 -0500
Mark Brown <[email protected]> • #964
LSB specification (or not) of /etc/init.d
Fri, 6 May 2005 09:33:50 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #963
Re: question on LSB internatonalisation runtime
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:35:38 +1000
Lawrence Lim <[email protected]> • #962
question on LSB internatonalisation runtime
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:57:23 +1000
Lawrence Lim <[email protected]> • #961
LSB 3 Preveiw is out
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:33:39 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #960
RE: How to know LSB
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:25:01 +0200
"Ossman, Ahmed" <[email protected]> • #959
LSB 2.1 rc2 out; review extended to Jan 14
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:02:38 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #958
Reminder: LSB 2.1 release candidate
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:40:58 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #957
[Bug 604] new theme has problems w/ Mozilla, Firefox
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:34:23 -0500
[email protected] • #956
[Bug 262] themes/LSB/banners not included on right side column
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:33:25 -0500
[email protected] • #955
[Bug 348] user-submitted articles should not go straight to homepage
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:33:37 -0500
[email protected] • #954
Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:00:05 -0500
[email protected] • #953
Re: lsb
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:48:05 +0100
Tobias Burnus <[email protected]> • #952
lsb
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:58:17 -0200
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[email protected]> • #951
Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 01:00:04 -0500
[email protected] • #950
Re: The LSB and Qt
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:20:55 -0700
Doug Beattie <[email protected]> • #949
Translations of the LSB Book
Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:46:53 +0800
Roger So <[email protected]> • #948
The LSB and Qt
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:07:07 -0500
Scott Collins <[email protected]> • #947
Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Mon, 08 Nov 2004 01:00:04 -0500
[email protected] • #946
Re: Looking for feedback on string APIs
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 18:02:58 +0000 (UTC)
Mark Hatle <[email protected]> • #945
Looking for feedback on string APIs
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:50:13 -0500 (EST)
Jim Kingdon <[email protected]> • #944
RE: [BUG?] MSG_DONTWAIT/MSG_NOSIGNAL not defined
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:38:18 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #943
[BUG?] MSG_DONTWAIT/MSG_NOSIGNAL not defined
Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:00:09 -0600
<[email protected]> • #942
LSB Bug Day on Fridays
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:29:58 -0800
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #941
Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Thu, 04 Nov 2004 01:00:03 -0500
[email protected] • #940
Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:02:20 -0500
[email protected] • #939
[Bug 347] article rating system broken
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:27:10 -0500
[email protected] • #938
[Bug 347] article rating system broken
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:35:27 -0500
[email protected] • #937
[Bug 604] new theme has problems w/ Mozilla, Firefox
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:35:27 -0500
[email protected] • #936
[Bug 604] New: new theme has problems w/ Mozilla, Firefox
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:17:23 -0500
[email protected] • #935
[Bug 347] article rating system broken
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:03:32 -0500
[email protected] • #934
[Bug 347] article rating system broken
Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:35:51 -0500
[email protected] • #933
RE: LSB 2.0 chroot environment request for assistance
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:52:30 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #932
LSB 2.0 chroot environment request for assistance
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:34:40 -0700
"Lew Newby Jr." <[email protected]> • #931
[Bug 428] wiki is flaky
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:25:18 -0400
[email protected] • #930
/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs flag in LSB
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:10:55 -0700
Don Armstrong <[email protected]> • #929
[Bug 524] working with 2.0
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:37:27 -0400
[email protected] • #928
[Bug 544] refspecs links for LSB 1.3 are broken
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:30:58 -0400
[email protected] • #927
dynamic vs static entries in user-config files
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:34:09 +0300
Andrius Kazimieras Kasparavicius <[email protected]> • #926
[Bug 544] refspecs links for LSB 1.3 are broken
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:33:45 -0400
[email protected] • #925
[Bug 544] New: refspecs links for LSB 1.3 are broken
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:53:38 -0400
[email protected] • #924
LSB compliant interface
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:11:49 -0500
Narender Ramireddy <[email protected]> • #923
Re: I suppose is a bug. Pentium4 architecture not full supported ...
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:53:15 +0200
"Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" <[email protected]> • #922
Re: I suppose is a bug. Pentium4 architecture not full supported ...
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:05:48 -0700
Nick Stoughton <[email protected]> • #921
Re: I suppose is a bug. Pentium4 architecture not full supported ...
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:50:39 -0400
Aaron Gaudio <[email protected]> • #920
Re: I suppose is a bug. Pentium4 architecture not full supported ...
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:54:13 -0400
Matt Wilson <[email protected]> • #919
I suppose is a bug. Pentium4 architecture not full supported ...
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:14:24 +0200
"Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" <[email protected]> • #918
[Bug 536] Content2 pages don't work for some users
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:17:49 -0400
[email protected] • #917
Re: support for i686
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 08:31:42 -0600
Doug Beattie <[email protected]> • #916
support for i686
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:05:43 -0500
"ganesh kumar" <[email protected]> • #915
[Bug 536] New: Content2 pages don't work for some users
Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:48:06 -0400
[email protected] • #914
[Bug 524] New: working with 2.0
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:40:44 -0400
[email protected] • #913
Re: Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:39:38 -0400
Aaron Gaudio <[email protected]> • #912
Re: Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:28:27 +0200
"Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" <[email protected]> • #911
Re: Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:55:52 +0200
Tobias Burnus <[email protected]> • #910
[Bug 84] Location of lsbsi-ia32-1.3.0.tar.bz2 is not specified
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:38:50 -0400
[email protected] • #909
[Bug 84] Location of lsbsi-ia32-1.3.0.tar.bz2 is not specified
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:38:09 -0400
[email protected] • #908
Re: Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:08:04 -0700
Bruce Korb <[email protected]> • #907
RE: Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:55:29 -0700
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> • #906
Re: Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:25:43 -0400
Aaron Gaudio <[email protected]> • #905
Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:28:03 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #904
Re: New uname option to query exact OS distribution
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:16:42 -0700
Bruce Korb <[email protected]> • #903
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.