gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite archive
389 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →
[Bug 1180] build Qt tests with lsbcc/lsbc++
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:22:38 -0500[Bug 1177] opensuse 10 missing symbols in gdk-x11
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:38:48 -0500Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:00:03 -0500[Bug 1182] libchk is checking for all Excluded interfaces
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:36:20 -0500[Bug 1182] New: libchk is checking for all Excluded interfaces
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:35:44 -0500[Bug 1080] LSB Desktop Initial (3.1) release
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:35:44 -0500[Bug 1180] build Qt tests with lsbcc/lsbc++
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:43:08 -0500[Bug 1180] New: build Qt tests with lsbcc/lsbc++
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:57:00 -0500[Bug 1179] lsbcc doesn't recognize Qt libraries
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:57:00 -0500[Bug 1177] opensuse 10 missing symbols in gdk-x11
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:46:05 -0500[Bug 1177] New: opensuse 10 missing symbols in gdk-x11
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:29:39 -0500[Bug 1176] New: make Mandrake's Qt 4.1 packages pass with libchk
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:14:43 -0500[Bug 1175] New: ppc and amd64 fixes for Qt libraries
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:13:24 -0500[Bug 1174] update for Qt's interfaces
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:12:14 -0500[Bug 1174] New: update for Qt's interfaces
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:11:53 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:40:55 -0500[Bug 1173] libchk reporting false positives for inline virtual methods
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:23:51 -0500[Bug 1173] New: libchk reporting false positives
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:21:38 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:58:40 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:03:55 -0500Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:00:03 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:11:22 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:07:51 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:04:55 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:28:13 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:26:02 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:12:21 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:04:49 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:01:07 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:45:40 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:52:06 -0500RE: [Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes withinheritance
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:31:59 -0800[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:10:50 -0500[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:55:43 -0500Re: new builds of lsb-test-desktop are available
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:51:53 -0500 (EST)Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:00:03 -0500new builds of lsb-test-desktop are available
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:35:17 +0800new builds of are available
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:34:17 +0800[Bug 1168] libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:57:11 -0500[Bug 1156] provide support for modular X font path setting
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:16:51 -0500RE: Any comments on bug #1156
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:44:54 -0800Any comments on bug #1156
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:50:52 +0800[Bug 1168] New: libchk outputs failures for Qt classes with inheritance
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:37:27 -0500Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:00:08 -0500Re: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:02:32 +0100Re: re: qmtest_libstdcpp-3.4.3-4.lsb3.x86_64.rpm
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:52:15 -0500 (EST)Re: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:14:36 +0800RE: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:07:25 -0800Re: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:04:28 +0100Re: re: qmtest_libstdcpp-3.4.3-4.lsb3.x86_64.rpm
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:51:16 +0800RE: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 05:24:43 -0800[Bug 1150] pamh = NULL tests not in spec
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:56:09 -0500Re: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:18:49 GMT[Bug 1150] pamh = NULL tests not in spec
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:15:32 -0500RE: re: qmtest_libstdcpp-3.4.3-4.lsb3.x86_64.rpm
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:19:00 -0800RE: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:18:14 -0800re: qmtest_libstdcpp-3.4.3-4.lsb3.x86_64.rpm
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:12:33 -0500 (EST)Re: lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:08:25 -0500 (EST)lsb-test-vsw4-3.1.0-1.x86_64.rpm
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:13:33 -0500 (EST)lsb-runtime 3.1.0-2
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:45:59 GMT[Bug 1158] libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:05:03 -0500[Bug 1158] libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:37:28 -0500RE: new builds are available
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:06:49 -0800[Bug 1158] libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:44:32 -0500Re: new builds are available
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:29:25 -0500 (EST)[Bug 1158] libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:38:33 -0500[Bug 1158] libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:14:46 -0500[Bug 1158] libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:34:04 -0500[Bug 1158] New: libchk and other checkers don't build
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:32:56 -0500RE: new builds are available
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:45:07 -0800new builds are available
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:37:23 +0800Test Telco reminder (today)
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:30:54 GMTYour Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:00:08 -0500RE: [Fwd: font path in xts5 test]
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:42:05 +1000[Bug 1156] New: provide support for modular X font path setting
Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:41:00 -0500RE: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:58:24 -0800RE: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:52:28 +0800Re: the X11 test suite for 3.1
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:58:45 GMTRE: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:46:24 -0800the X11 test suite for 3.1
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:59:35 -0800Re: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:13 GMTRe: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:54:48 +0530Re: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:56:38 GMTRe: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:06:36 +0530RE: Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:06:22 -0800Does anyone still want to check in ?
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:01:43 +0800[Bug 712] standalone tet package
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:43:08 -0500RE: adding pytet to lsb-tet (was Re: lsb-destkop-test rpm:fontconfig integration)
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:17:51 +0800RE: adding pytet to lsb-tet (was Re: lsb-destkop-test rpm:fontconfig integration)
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:38:09 -0800RE: [Fwd: font path in xts5 test]
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:53:24 -0800Re: adding pytet to lsb-tet (was Re: lsb-destkop-test rpm: fontconfig integration)
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:30:28 +0800RE: RE: Initial patch for toolset modification proposal
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:28:41 +0530RE: RE: binding module definitions to the DB
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:20 +0530Re: RE: binding module definitions to the DB
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:46:53 -0700Re: RE: Initial patch for toolset modification proposal
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:34:05 -0700adding pytet to lsb-tet (was Re: lsb-destkop-test rpm: fontconfig integration)
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:31:13 GMTYour Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:00:07 -0500RE: binding module definitions to the DB
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:16:11 +0530RE: Initial patch for toolset modification proposal
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:42:59 +0530binding module definitions to the DB
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:56:21 -0800
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.