gmane.linux.lvm.general archive

395 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:38:51 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18537
Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:35:33 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18536
Re: [PATCH 6/6] multipathd: don't activate socket activation by default
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:05:01 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18535
Re: [PATCH 5/6] multipath: udev rules: use configured $(bindir) in udev rules
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:04:39 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18534
Re: [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:03:54 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18533
Re: [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:36:10 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18532
Re: [PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: fix list of imported properties
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:32:45 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18531
Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:30:45 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18530
Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
Tue, 06 Feb 2024 11:50:46 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18529
Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:44:50 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18528
[PATCH 6/6] multipathd: don't activate socket activation by default
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:38 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18527
[PATCH 5/6] multipath: udev rules: use configured $(bindir) in udev rules
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:37 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18526
[PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:36 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18525
[PATCH 0/6] multipath-tools: udev rules and service improvements
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:32 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18524
[PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:35 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18523
[PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: fix list of imported properties
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:34 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18522
[PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:46:33 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18521
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:35:03 -0500
Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> • #18520
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:21:55 -0600
Glenn Washburn <[email protected]> • #18519
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:05:26 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18518
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:17:51 +0800
Heming Zhao <[email protected]> • #18517
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:17:19 -0600
Roger Heflin <[email protected]> • #18516
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:18:36 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18515
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:13:17 +0100
Anthony Iliopoulos <[email protected]> • #18514
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:35:49 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18513
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:58:45 +0100
Anthony Iliopoulos <[email protected]> • #18512
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:50:01 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18511
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:42:26 -0500
Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> • #18510
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:15:32 +0100
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18509
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:54:54 +0800
Su Yue <[email protected]> • #18508
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:01:52 +0100
Anthony Iliopoulos <[email protected]> • #18507
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:26:20 +0300
Ilia Zykov <[email protected]> • #18506
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:52:57 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18505
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 14:46:13 +0100
Anthony Iliopoulos <[email protected]> • #18504
Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:48:41 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18503
[Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:22:09 +0800
Su Yue <[email protected]> • #18502
Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:58:47 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18501
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:56:02 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18500
Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:29:40 +0000
[email protected] • #18499
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:00:54 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18498
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 04:45:35 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18497
Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:50:06 +0100
Gionatan Danti <[email protected]> • #18496
Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:40:47 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18495
Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 23:00:08 +0100
Gionatan Danti <[email protected]> • #18494
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 22:05:02 +0300
Ilia Zykov <[email protected]> • #18493
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:24:10 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18492
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:10:15 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18491
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:06:57 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18490
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 06:13:29 -0600
Roger Heflin <[email protected]> • #18489
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:48:32 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18488
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:21:43 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18487
Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:08:14 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18486
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:36:24 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18485
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:22:14 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18484
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:17:31 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18483
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:13:15 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18482
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:30:36 +0300
Ilia Zykov <[email protected]> • #18481
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:24:29 -0500
Phillip Susi <[email protected]> • #18480
Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:07:49 -0600
Roger Heflin <[email protected]> • #18479
Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Mon, 15 Jan 2024 07:30:51 +0000
Andy Smith <[email protected]> • #18478
pvmove stuck/hung
Fri, 12 Jan 2024 19:14:38 -0800
Devin Vance <[email protected]> • #18477
add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:19:12 +0000
[email protected] • #18476
pvmove stuck/hung
Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:59:41 -0800
Devin Vance <[email protected]> • #18475
Re: Unable to resize a logical volume due to wrong reported asked size
Fri, 5 Jan 2024 09:17:15 +0100
François-Xavier Payet <[email protected]> • #18474
Re: Unable to resize a logical volume due to wrong reported asked size
Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:00:08 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18473
Unable to resize a logical volume due to wrong reported asked size
Thu, 4 Jan 2024 22:01:04 +0100
François-Xavier Payet <[email protected]> • #18472
Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
Tue, 2 Jan 2024 13:01:35 +0100
Mikhail Morfikov <[email protected]> • #18471
Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:45:18 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18470
Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:13:28 +0100
Mikhail Morfikov <[email protected]> • #18469
Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
Tue, 2 Jan 2024 11:41:05 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18468
Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 01:48:00 +0100
Mikhail Morfikov <[email protected]> • #18467
Re: lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 19:28:32 +0100
Gionatan Danti <[email protected]> • #18466
lvm2 2.03.23 git tag
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:34:05 +0100
Christian Hesse <[email protected]> • #18465
Re: lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:42:54 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18464
Re: lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:01:47 +0100
Roberto Fastec <[email protected]> • #18463
lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 23:28:24 +0100
Wolf480pl <[email protected]> • #18462
Re: vgcreate fails with 'already exists in filesystem' error
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:54:37 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18461
vgcreate fails with 'already exists in filesystem' error
Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:10:52 +0530
divya mohan <[email protected]> • #18460
[PATCH] man: add inte(g)rity to man lvs
Wed, 6 Dec 2023 10:26:13 +0100
Lukas Herbolt <[email protected]> • #18459
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:35:00 +0000
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18458
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:25:50 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18457
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:10:12 +0000
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18456
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 11:56:33 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18455
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:39:11 +0000
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18454
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:13:01 +0100
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]> • #18453
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:05:22 +0000
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> • #18452
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:03:12 -0500
Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> • #18451
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:16:48 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18450
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:57:35 -0500
Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> • #18449
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:25:50 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18448
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:47:22 -0500
Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> • #18447
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:22:06 -0500
Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> • #18446
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:27:00 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18445
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:13:07 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18444
Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:34:51 -0600
David Teigland <[email protected]> • #18443
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.