gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination archive
269 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 3). Latest articles →
Re: PPC Repos
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:20:10 +0200PPC Repos
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:22:06 -0400fwd: Re: F7 Test 1 coming soon
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:10 +0100Pre-FOSDEM meeting
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:53 +0100 (CET)Re: ATrpms: rhX, rhfcY becomes RHLX, fcY
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:41:27 +0200 (CEST)ATrpms: rhX, rhfcY becomes RHLX, fcY
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:01:33 +0200fc6 version tag added to bugzilla
Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:04:42 +0200fwd: [apt-rpm] New website, mailinglist and 0.5.15lorg3 released!
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:35:28 +0200Warning: RHL chroots on FC5/2.6.16 break
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:18:53 +0200FC5 repos
Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:13:12 +0200[apt-rpm] Time to stir up the competition ;)
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:45:55 +0200New package repository
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:57:14 -0800fc5 version tag added to bugzilla.atrpms.net
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:38:46 +0100Fedora Core blocking package replacements by default
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:38:07 +0100Re: Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:07:28 +0200Re: Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:03:52 +0800Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:41:36 +0800Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:30:24 +0800Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:13:04 +0200Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:48:12 +0800Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:34:39 +0200Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:00:02 +0800Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:37:35 +0200Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:40:31 +0800Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:12:09 +0200Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:01:02 +0800Re: [repo-coord] dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:05:13 +0200 (CEST)Re: dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:11 +0200Re: [repo-coord] dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:10:49 +0200 (CEST)Re: RPM compatibility
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:40:41 +0200dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:15:44 +0200medley of packages: 7244 packages for FC4/i386
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:21:34 +0200Bugzilla upgrade
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:46:17 +0200fc4 version tag added to bugzilla.atrpms.net
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:25:20 +0200Re: Which distributions to support?
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:44:41 +0800Which distributions to support?
Tue, 31 May 2005 14:21:20 +0200Upgrading kernels (and kmdls) with apt/smart/yum
Sat, 28 May 2005 09:16:40 +0200RPMforge invitation
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:55:32 +0200 (CEST)Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:51:58 -0300Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:51:42 +0100Re: Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:40:36 +0100 (CET)Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:16:11 +0100Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:16:26 +0100 (CET)smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:22:51 +0800Re: [repo-coord] Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:06:49 +0800Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:58:59 +0100Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:43:43 +0800Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:52:43 -0500Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:31 +0800repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:13:26 +0100Re: Latest apt broken?
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:32:02 +0100 (CET)Re: Latest apt broken?
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:17:06 +0100yum and ATrpms: why there appear to be conflicts
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:48:10 +0100Re: New tcl/tk RPM conflicts with Tk/Itcl apps
Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:36:51 +0800Re: New tcl/tk RPM conflicts with Tk/Itcl apps
Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:17:31 +0800Re: python24
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:57:26 +0800Re: python24
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:17:02 +0100python24
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:03:26 +0800Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 04:13:20 +0100Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:44:13 +0800Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:56:56 +0100Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:19:37 +0800Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:03:17 +0100Re: New domain
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:27:17 +0000Re: [PyVault-devel] Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:16:20 +0800Re: New domain
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:04:58 +0100Re: asterisk 1.0.3 rennt nu
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:50:55 +0100asterisk 1.0.3 rennt nu
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:32:01 +0100(no subject)
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:14:49 +0100Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:38:50 +0100Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:53:12 +0800Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:13:04 +0100Re: disttags, useful?? (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:00:39 +0100Re: Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:02:56 +0800Packaging Python Pyvault Style (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:56:41 +0800Re: disttags, useful?? (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:43:16 +0800Re: disttags, useful?? (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:53:55 +0100 (CET)Re: disttags, useful?? (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 01:00:30 +0800disttags, useful?? (was Re: python 2.3 for RH7.3)
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:50:46 +0800Re: Smart package manager (Was: Same named packages, different dependencies)
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:26:22 +0100JPackage 1.6
Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:39:02 +0100Re: [repo-coord] Re: nVidia rpms ...
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:34:27 +0100 (CET)Bugzilla update
Sat, 4 Dec 2004 13:11:23 +0100multilib repos (was: nVidia rpms ...)
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:27:17 +0100Re: [repo-coord] Re: nVidia rpms ...
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:14:45 -0500Re: [repo-coord] Re: nVidia rpms ...
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:22:17 +0200multilib repos (was: nVidia rpms ...)
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:13:42 +0100Re: Re: nVidia rpms ...
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:29:32 +0100 (CET)Re: nVidia rpms ...
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:15:40 +0100New domain
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:04:54 +0000RH9 -> FC2 dist upgrade
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:42:57 +0800fc3 version tag added to bugzilla.atrpms.net
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:10:41 +0200Re: UML build system?
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:26:55 +0200 (CEST)UML build system?
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:24:54 +0200Re: Practice, use, design and implementation of rpm
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:18:51 +0200Re: Re: Practice, use, design and implementation of rpm
Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:06:49 +0800Re: [Rpm-devel] Re: Practice, use, design and implementation of rpm
Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:16:27 -0400Re: Practice, use, design and implementation of rpm
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:53:39 +0200Re: Re: Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:37:12 +0800Re: Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:41:04 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.