gmane.linux.zynot.general archive

105 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

RE: ^_^ meay-meay!
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:46:13 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #105
RE: ^_^ meay-meay!
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:25:37 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #104
^_^ meay-meay!
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:02:15 -0600
[email protected] • #103
Re: Final call for reviews and comments on Xeta document specifications
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:34:33 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Albuschat <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Final call for reviews and comments on Xeta document specifications
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:16:29 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Albuschat <[email protected]> • #101
Final call for reviews and comments on Xeta document specifications
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:16:46 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #100
Meeting tomorrow, Saturday at 3PM UTC
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:22:15 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #99
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:29:58 +0100
Pac <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:48:42 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #97
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:45:23 +0100
Pac <[email protected]> • #96
Re: C++ Coding Style
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:00:15 +0100
Andreas Pokorny <[email protected]> • #95
Re: C++ Coding Style
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:09:09 +0100
Andreas Pokorny <[email protected]> • #94
C++ Coding Style
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:03:55 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #93
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:13:02 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #92
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:02:27 +0100
Pac <[email protected]> • #91
RE: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:01:14 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #90
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:55:02 +0100
Pac <[email protected]> • #89
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:50:16 +0100
Pac <[email protected]> • #88
RE: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:43:11 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #87
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:12:49 +0100
[email protected] • #86
Re: Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:50:26 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #85
Why a DTD and not a XML-Schema ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:35:05 +0100
[email protected] • #84
Exploits for certain types of RPC models
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:34:17 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #83
The GPL is a license, not a contract.
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:58:25 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #82
Re: Need for security model
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:55:53 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #81
Re: Need for security model
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:17:29 -0600
Mark Bainter <[email protected]> • #80
Fwd: [gnu.org #138032] Dual, triple and n-licensing
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:59:51 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #79
RE: Need for security model
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:06:15 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #78
Re: Need for security model
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:08:22 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #77
RE: Need for security model
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:00:04 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #76
The Eight Fallacies of Distributed Computing
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:00:53 -0500
Chris Frey <[email protected]> • #75
Re: Need for security model
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:25:49 -0500
Chris Frey <[email protected]> • #74
Re: Need for security model
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 21:59:55 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Need for security model
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:11:11 -0500
Chris Frey <[email protected]> • #72
test
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:40:54 -0600
Dave Thacker <[email protected]> • #71
Need for security model
Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:48:36 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #70
List test--please ignore
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:09:57 -0600
Dave Thacker <[email protected]> • #69
test of list
Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:47:30 -0600
Dave Thacker <[email protected]> • #68
Re: Summary of meeting 20031119-1
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:17:46 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #67
RE: Summary of meeting 20031119-1
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:50:52 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #66
Re: Summary of meeting 20031119-1
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:06:59 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #65
Re: Summary of meeting 20031119-1
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:52:50 +0100
Dirk Heinrichs <[email protected]> • #64
Summary of meeting 20031119-1
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:38:24 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #63
Re: xeta security model, and hello
Sat, 1 Nov 2003 22:30:41 -0500
Chris Frey <[email protected]> • #62
RE: xeta security model, and hello
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:43 +0100
"Frantz Dhin" <[email protected]> • #61
xeta security model, and hello
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:32:24 -0500
Chris Frey <[email protected]> • #60
RE: Requirements meeting
20 Sep 2003 17:44:42 +0100
Gareth Buxton <[email protected]> • #59
RE: Requirements meeting
19 Sep 2003 15:29:02 +0000
Jack Morgan <[email protected]> • #58
RE: Requirements meeting
19 Sep 2003 13:51:01 +0100
Gareth Buxton <[email protected]> • #57
Requirements meeting
19 Sep 2003 13:37:23 +0100
Gareth Buxton <[email protected]> • #56
RequirementsSpecification now in svn
17 Sep 2003 00:04:21 +0100
Gareth Buxton <[email protected]> • #55
Revised Package Manager Requirements List
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:56:58 +0800
Low Zhen Lin <[email protected]> • #54
Requirements
08 Sep 2003 14:51:25 +0100
Gareth Buxton <[email protected]> • #53
Re: porteus status
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:28:20 -0500
"Kevin Horn" <[email protected]> • #52
porteus status
31 Jul 2003 09:56:54 -0500
Jon Nall <[email protected]> • #51
Re: Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
14 Jul 2003 18:39:58 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #50
Re: Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:37:36 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #49
Re: [zynaut] Re: Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
14 Jul 2003 13:24:56 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #48
Re: [zynaut] Re: Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:13:53 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #47
Re: [zynaut] Re: Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:10:24 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #46
Re: Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:59:58 -0500
Mark Bainter <[email protected]> • #45
Re: Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
14 Jul 2003 04:07:13 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #44
Re: Repoteus: LiveCD Problem
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:41:14 +0200
Amir Guindehi <[email protected]> • #43
Re: [zynaut] Re: Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 22:23:26 -0700
Henry Jen <[email protected]> • #42
Re: Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 19:40:18 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #41
Re: Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
13 Jul 2003 16:24:39 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #40
Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:48:32 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #39
Repoteus: Zynot Tree Vision
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 04:43:54 -0700
Zach Welch <[email protected]> • #38
Re: requirement list for porteus-0.5
Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:52:25 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #37
Re: requirement list for porteus-0.5
Mon, 7 Jul 2003 21:46:03 +0100
Mark Gordon <[email protected]> • #36
Re: [Zynot-pkgmgr] Re: requirement list for porteus-0.5
Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:36:28 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #35
Re: [zynaut] requirement list for porteus-0.5
07 Jul 2003 13:30:39 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #34
requirement list for porteus-0.5
07 Jul 2003 14:44:18 -0500
Jon Nall <[email protected]> • #33
Re: tree overlay conflict resolution
Thu, 03 Jul 2003 16:37:03 -0400
Mark Guertin <[email protected]> • #32
Re: tree overlay conflict resolution
03 Jul 2003 15:35:25 -0500
Jon Nall <[email protected]> • #31
Re: tree overlay conflict resolution
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:12:34 -0500
"Kevin Horn" <[email protected]> • #30
Re: Kernel config dependencies?
02 Jul 2003 23:54:20 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #29
tree overlay conflict resolution
02 Jul 2003 23:26:24 -0500
Jon Nall <[email protected]> • #28
Re: Kernel config dependencies?
Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:22:48 -0500
Mark Bainter <[email protected]> • #27
Re: Kernel config dependencies?
Wed, 2 Jul 2003 22:52:20 +0100
Mark Gordon <[email protected]> • #26
Kernel config dependencies?
02 Jul 2003 22:23:28 +0100
Gareth Buxton <[email protected]> • #25
help needed with current portage effort
30 Jun 2003 22:11:04 -0500
Jon Nall <[email protected]> • #24
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
30 Jun 2003 11:36:51 -0700
jesse <[email protected]> • #23
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:01:37 -0400
mark guertin <[email protected]> • #22
Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:56:31 +0200
Benjamin Judas <[email protected]> • #21
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
<[email protected]> • #20
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:22:33 -0500
"Kevin Horn" <[email protected]> • #19
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:59:23 -0400
mark guertin <[email protected]> • #18
Downloading version patches instead of full releases
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:32:52 -0500
Mark Bainter <[email protected]> • #17
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:12:11 -0500
Mark Bainter <[email protected]> • #16
Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:46:51 -0500
Mark Bainter <[email protected]> • #15
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
30 Jun 2003 09:23:16 -0500
Jon Nall <[email protected]> • #14
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:39:17 -0400
mark guertin <[email protected]> • #13
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:41:34 -0500
"Kevin Horn" <[email protected]> • #12
Re: ebuilds in XML
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 03:27:27 +0200
Uwe Reimann <[email protected]> • #11
Re: Re: ebuilds in XML
Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:16:18 -0400
mark guertin <[email protected]> • #10
Re: ebuilds in XML
30 Jun 2003 01:39:33 +0100
Andrew Aylett <[email protected]> • #9
Re: ebuilds in XML
Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:39:33 -0500
Chris Johnson <[email protected]> • #8
Re: ebuilds in XML
Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:17:39 -0400
mark guertin <[email protected]> • #7
Re: ebuilds in XML
Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:04:34 -0500
"Kevin Horn" <[email protected]> • #6
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.