gmane.lisp.cclan.general archive

779 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 8). Latest articles →

Consolidating Common Lisp Libraries
Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:39:25 -0500
Faré <[email protected]> • #973
Re: XCVB patch for split-sequence
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:29:15 +0100
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #972
XCVB patch for split-sequence
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:23:40 -0400
Faré <[email protected]> • #971
Re: How to depend on a system optionally?
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:26:52 +0200
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <[email protected]> • #970
Re: How to depend on a system optionally?
Mon, 18 May 2009 14:51:23 +0200
james anderson <[email protected]> • #969
Re: How to depend on a system optionally?
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:55:44 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #968
Re: How to depend on a system optionally?
Mon, 18 May 2009 07:42:31 -0500
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #967
How to depend on a system optionally?
Mon, 18 May 2009 14:28:29 +0200
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <[email protected]> • #966
sourceforge website + cliki
Thu, 7 May 2009 22:52:40 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #965
Re: git repo on cl.net trashed?!
Thu, 7 May 2009 22:37:38 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #964
git repo on cl.net trashed?!
Thu, 7 May 2009 20:49:37 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #963
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 21:39:29 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #962
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 13:52:06 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #961
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 19:09:43 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #960
Re: asdf on cl.net -- beta
Tue, 5 May 2009 10:03:01 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #959
Re: asdf on cl.net -- beta
Tue, 05 May 2009 09:22:39 -0400
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #958
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 05 May 2009 08:20:34 -0500
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #957
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 09:02:22 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #956
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 08:45:02 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #955
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 11:45:42 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #954
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 10:28:06 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #953
Re: git repository for ASDF
Tue, 5 May 2009 10:16:50 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #952
Re: git repository for ASDF
Mon, 04 May 2009 14:16:19 -0500
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #951
asdf on cl.net -- beta
Mon, 4 May 2009 11:20:53 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #950
Re: ASDF:OPERATE should bind *PACKAGE* and *READTABLE*
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:09:29 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #949
Re: git repository for ASDF
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:08:40 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #948
Re: git repository for ASDF
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:42:42 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #947
git repository for ASDF
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:23:00 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #946
Re: ASDF:OPERATE should bind *PACKAGE* and *READTABLE*
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:42:17 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #945
Re: ASDF:OPERATE should bind *PACKAGE* and *READTABLE*
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:20:03 -0400
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #944
ASDF:OPERATE should bind *PACKAGE* and *READTABLE*
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:29:04 +0300
Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> • #943
[[email protected]: asdf to cl.net; cvs to git]
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:17:58 -0800 (PST)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #942
Re: asdf to cl.net; cvs to git
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:41:53 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Herring <[email protected]> • #941
Re: asdf to cl.net; cvs to git
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:01 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #940
Re: asdf to cl.net; cvs to git
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:04:13 +0100
Attila Lendvai <[email protected]> • #939
asdf to cl.net; cvs to git
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:39:10 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #938
Re: wither ASDF
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:12:09 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #937
Re: wither ASDF
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:46:46 +0000
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]> • #936
Re: wither ASDF
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:32:31 -0500
Faré <[email protected]> • #935
Re: wither ASDF
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:51:20 -0800 (PST)
C Y <[email protected]> • #934
Re: wither ASDF
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:02:03 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #933
Re: whither ASDF
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:17:39 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #932
Re: wither ASDF
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:20:14 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #931
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:25:27 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #930
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:20:25 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #929
wither ASDF
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:18:30 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #928
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:31:05 +0000
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]> • #927
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:29:42 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #926
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:24:11 +0000
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #925
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:50:38 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #924
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:28:30 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #923
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:31:49 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #922
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:19:08 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #921
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:01:27 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #920
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:54:32 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #919
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:20:32 -0800 (PST)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #918
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:51:00 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #917
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:39:55 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #916
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:37:30 -0800 (PST)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #915
Re: aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:57:00 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Herring <[email protected]> • #914
Re: ASDF on MSWin
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:49:56 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #913
aside from the pangs of history, what about moving ASDF to common-lisp.net
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:49:09 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #912
ASDF on MSWin
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:00:29 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Herring <[email protected]> • #911
Re: ASDF commit
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:01:27 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #910
ASDF commit
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:52:00 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #909
Re: MISSING-DEPENDENCY not providing some retry restart?
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:49:51 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #908
Re: MISSING-DEPENDENCY not providing some retry restart?
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:38:41 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #907
Re: MISSING-DEPENDENCY not providing some retry restart?
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:52:57 +0000
Luis Oliveira <[email protected]> • #906
MISSING-DEPENDENCY not providing some retry restart?
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:27:31 +0100
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <[email protected]> • #905
Re: Add CLEAN-OP to ASDF?
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:07:49 +0000
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #904
Re: Add CLEAN-OP to ASDF?
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:04:16 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #903
Re: Add CLEAN-OP to ASDF?
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:55:24 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #902
Re: Add CLEAN-OP to ASDF?
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:50:25 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #901
Re: Add CLEAN-OP to ASDF?
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:36:31 +0000
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #900
Add CLEAN-OP to ASDF?
Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:39:00 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #899
asdf patch: clisp has mop
Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:13:17 -0500
Sam Steingold <[email protected]> • #898
Re: How do I replace my broken ':perform' forms?
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:35:16 -0500
Thom Goodsell <[email protected]> • #897
Re: How do I replace my broken ':perform' forms?
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:23:34 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #896
Re: How do I replace my broken ':perform' forms?
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:47:55 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #895
How do I replace my broken ':perform' forms?
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:13:00 -0500
Thom Goodsell <[email protected]> • #894
[PATCH] COMPONENT-DEPENDS-ON and operation subclasses
Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:31:09 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #893
asdf replacement
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:46:59 -0400
"Faré" <[email protected]> • #892
a non-contentious patch for ASDF... <smile>
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:54:37 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #891
adding system-loaded-p to ASDF
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:01:23 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #890
Re: A plurality of defsystems [was Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components ]
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #889
Re: A plurality of defsystems [was Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components ]
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:59:59 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #888
A plurality of defsystems [was Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components ]
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:57:51 -0400
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #887
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:08:57 -0400
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #886
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:14:06 -0500
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #885
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:06:49 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #884
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:27:41 +0100
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]> • #883
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:16:51 +0300
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #882
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:08:14 +0100
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #881
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:51:27 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #880
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:33:42 +0100
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #879
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:08:04 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #878
Re: rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:12:04 -0400
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #877
rfc - delay the parsing of system components
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:12:00 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #876
Re: in-order-to and/or do-first
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:50:14 +0100
Andreas Fuchs <[email protected]> • #875
Re: in-order-to and/or do-first
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:22:18 -0400
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #874
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.