gmane.lisp.lisa.general archive

141 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

New fork of LISA
Sat, 6 Feb 2021 11:09:41 -0600
George Williams <[email protected]> • #141
Re: Benchmarks Anyone?
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:00:48 +0200
Johan Lindberg <[email protected]> • #140
Benchmarks Anyone?
Wed, 27 May 2009 01:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Nunez Steve <[email protected]> • #139
[SOLVED] Re: faking multislots with lists
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:18:49 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #138
faking multislots with lists
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:56:08 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #137
Re: how to bind a variable with multislots in the LHS?
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:12:16 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #136
Package lock fix and OR patterns
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
Ramarren <[email protected]> • #135
Re: how to bind a variable with multislots in the LHS?
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:50:31 +0100
"Johan Lindberg" <[email protected]> • #134
Re: how to bind a variable with multislots in the LHS?
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:55:46 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #133
how to bind a variable with multislots in the LHS?
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:06:13 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #132
Re: how to change clos slots
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:57:34 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #131
Re: how to change clos slots
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:46:15 +0100
"Johan Lindberg" <[email protected]> • #130
how to change clos slots
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:37:58 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #129
Re: rules for previous and next items in a list
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:30:42 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #128
rules for previous and next items in a list
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:59:34 -0300
[email protected] (Pedro Kröger) • #127
Re: basic question
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:00:21 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #126
basic question
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:01:12 -1000
Kaveh Kardan <[email protected]> • #125
Lisa rules check fact slot names, not CLOS accessors
Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:20:35 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #124
Re: lisa.asd: reference to epilogue.lisp no longer needed
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:25:10 -0400
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #123
Re: lisa.asd: reference to epilogue.lisp no longer needed
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:29:03 +0200
Ralf Mattes <[email protected]> • #122
Re: Latest Lisa CVS sources break existing code
Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:07:49 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #121
Latest Lisa CVS sources break existing code
Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:30:12 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #120
Re: lisa.asd: reference to epilogue.lisp no longer needed
Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:55:06 -0400
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #119
lisa.asd: reference to epilogue.lisp no longer needed
Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:43:24 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #118
Re: Upcoming Lisa work
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 20:35:37 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #117
Upcoming Lisa work
Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:16:31 -0400
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #116
Edi's performance issue addressed
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:36:15 -0500
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #115
Even more on Edi's performance issue
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:24:08 -0500
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #114
More on Edi's performance problem
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:10:02 -0500
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #113
Re: performance problems
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:09:57 -0500
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Performance problems
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:25:55 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #111
Re: Performance problems
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:20:07 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #110
Performance problems
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:14:22 +0100
Edi Weitz <[email protected]> • #109
RE: [soar-group] rule systems for crontab and active databases?
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:50:53 -0800
"Karl B. Schwamb" <[email protected]> • #108
Re: Lisa Database Sizes
Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:24:33 -0500
"David Young" <[email protected]> • #107
Re: Lisa Database Sizes
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:56:48 +0100
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #106
Re: Simple Question
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:49:00 -0800
Brent Fulgham <[email protected]> • #105
Lisa Database Sizes
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:44:33 -0800
Brent Fulgham <[email protected]> • #104
Re: Simple Question
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:04:12 -0800
Brent Fulgham <[email protected]> • #103
Re: Simple Question
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:08:21 +0100
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #102
Simple Question
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:13:40 -0800
Brent Fulgham <[email protected]> • #101
rule systems for crontab and active databases?
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:55:20 -0500
Andrew Piskorski <[email protected]> • #100
Debugging tip
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:38:49 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #99
Re: Taxonomic reasoning
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:28:41 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #98
RE: Taxonomic reasoning
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:34:37 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #97
Re: Taxonomic reasoning
Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:33:39 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #96
RE: Taxonomic reasoning
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:02:08 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #95
RE: Taxonomic reasoning
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:46:55 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #94
RE: Taxonomic reasoning
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:39:33 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #93
RE: CONSIDER-TAXONOMY: inconsistent default in LISA/ documentation
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:38:05 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #92
Taxonomic reasoning
Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:24:59 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #91
CONSIDER-TAXONOMY: inconsistent default in LISA/documentation
Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:10:08 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #90
Re: [lisa] RE: Testing Lisa
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 19:35:02 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #89
RE: Testing Lisa
Fri, 02 Sep 2005 21:57:25 +0200
"R. Mattes" <[email protected]> • #88
RE: Testing Lisa
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:25:21 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #87
Testing Lisa
Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:10:53 +0200
"R. Mattes" <[email protected]> • #86
RE: Blog posting on LISA
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:31:26 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #85
Blog posting on LISA
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:42:26 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #84
Re: [lisa] Looking for example of WITH-SIMPLE-QUERY
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:13:11 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #83
Looking for example of WITH-SIMPLE-QUERY
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:38:57 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #82
Release 2.3
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:05:44 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #81
Re: [PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:04:16 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #80
Re: [PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:29:11 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #79
[PATCH] SBCL support
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:25:43 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #78
RE: [PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:52:12 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #77
Re: [PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 10:19:12 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #76
RE: [PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:56:30 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #75
RE: [PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:08:44 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #74
[PATCH] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:00:46 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #73
Re: [lisa] Re: lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:34:44 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #72
Re: [lisa] Re: lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:05:41 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #71
Re: [lisa] lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:03:36 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #70
Re: lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:21:29 -0500
Andy Sloane <[email protected]> • #69
lisa bug: matching on retracted facts
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 00:42:17 -0500
momerath <[email protected]> • #68
Re: [lisa] ASDF definition for Lisa debugger
Tue, 31 May 2005 12:52:46 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #67
Re: [lisa] Re: CLIPS (matches <rule>) and (watch compilations): how can be implemented?
Tue, 31 May 2005 12:53:23 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #66
ASDF definition for Lisa debugger
Mon, 30 May 2005 21:29:26 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #65
Re: CLIPS (matches <rule>) and (watch compilations): how can be implemented?
Sun, 29 May 2005 15:42:29 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #64
CLIPS (matches <rule>) and (watch compilations): how can be implemented?
Sun, 29 May 2005 13:41:58 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #63
Re: What's the purpose of CLEANUP rule in mab-clos.lisp example?
Sun, 8 May 2005 18:49:56 -0400
[email protected] • #62
What's the purpose of CLEANUP rule in mab-clos.lisp example?
Fri, 06 May 2005 20:48:46 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #61
RE: Difference between ASSERT and ASSERT-INSTANCE
Thu, 5 May 2005 15:28:36 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #60
Difference between ASSERT and ASSERT-INSTANCE
Thu, 05 May 2005 21:28:19 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #59
Re: Lisa's MODIFY = RETRACT + ASSERT?
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:25:22 +0000
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #58
Re: Lisa's MODIFY = RETRACT + ASSERT?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:23:37 -0500
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #57
Lisa's MODIFY = RETRACT + ASSERT?
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:23:44 +0100
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #56
Re: RULE-SHORT-NAME exported twice
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:24:50 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #55
Re: RULE-SHORT-NAME exported twice
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:34:28 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #54
RE: RULE-SHORT-NAME exported twice
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:15:18 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #53
RULE-SHORT-NAME exported twice
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:32:56 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #52
Re: [lisa] rule-printer: CF 0.000 ?
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:48:13 -0400
"David E. Young" <[email protected]> • #51
rule-printer: CF 0.000 ?
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:47:07 +0200
Reini Urban <[email protected]> • #50
RE: Rule docstrings
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:43:24 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #49
Rule docstrings
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:22:37 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #48
RE: Why use lisa::*allow-duplicate-facts* directly?
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:01:40 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #47
Why use lisa::*allow-duplicate-facts* directly?
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:26 +0200
Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> • #46
Re: Lisa 2.1beta and CF
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:09:37 +0200
Reini Urban <[email protected]> • #45
Lisa 2.1beta and CF
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:44:14 -0400
"Young, David" <[email protected]> • #44
Re: CF support update
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:05:20 +0200
Reini Urban <[email protected]> • #43
Re: CF support update
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:55:51 +0200
Reini Urban <[email protected]> • #42
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.