gmane.lisp.scheme.srfi.srfi-48 archive

120 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: Errata for SRFI 48: Intermediate Format Strings
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:25:12 -0800
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #120
Adjust for Gambit and update tests
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:35:33 +0900
hamay1010 <[email protected]> • #119
Re: Errata for SRFI 48: Intermediate Format Strings
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:20:14 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #118
Fix format ~f and update tests (3rd)
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:58:20 +0900
hamay1010 <[email protected]> • #117
Re: Errata for SRFI 48: Intermediate Format Strings
Sat, 28 Oct 2017 21:48:04 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #116
Define three procedures for format ~F
Sat, 28 Oct 2017 19:14:22 +0900
hamay1010 <[email protected]> • #115
Re: Errata for SRFI 48: Intermediate Format Strings
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:30:03 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #114
Fix format ~F (2nd) and update tests
Sat, 28 Oct 2017 01:59:35 +0900
hamay1010 <[email protected]> • #113
Errata for SRFI 48: Intermediate Format Strings
Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:32:30 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #112
Fix format ~F
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:05:12 +0900
hamay1010 <[email protected]> • #111
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Wed, 18 Oct 2017 15:11:36 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #110
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:19:38 -0400
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #109
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Sat, 14 Oct 2017 06:11:35 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #108
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:03:22 +0900
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #107
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:54:51 -1000
Shiro Kawai <[email protected]> • #106
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:52:40 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #105
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:51:49 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #104
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:51:21 -0400
Marc Feeley <[email protected]> • #103
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:33:57 -0400
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:13:44 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #101
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:58:30 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #100
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:09:57 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #99
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:13:24 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:40:02 -1000
Shiro Kawai <[email protected]> • #97
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:42:19 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #96
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:07:17 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #95
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:04:46 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #94
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:32:55 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #93
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:36:43 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #92
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:45:54 -0700
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #91
Bug in srfi-48?
Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:42:51 -0400
Donald Allen <[email protected]> • #90
Re: SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?
Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:48:23 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #89
Re: SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?
Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:44:36 -0500
"Sudarshan S Chawathe" <[email protected]> • #88
Re: SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?
Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:27:59 -0800
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <[email protected]> • #87
Re: SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?
Fri, 1 Jan 2016 01:00:29 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #86
SRFI-48 incorrect mutation of literal list in example?
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 21:32:18 -0500
"Sudarshan S Chawathe" <[email protected]> • #85
Join our pharmacy
Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:15:14 +0000 (UTC)
Prozac for cheap <acg-hdlc-9q/xBM6aKHWYiHlHNrFGKlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> • #84
Re: behaviour of ~& in format string
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 19:37:08 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #83
behaviour of ~& in format string
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:46:29 -0700
Stephen Lewis <[email protected]> • #82
Re: w,dF under Guile and Gauche
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:40:38 -0700
Stephen Lewis <[email protected]> • #81
Re: w,dF under Guile and Gauche
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:06:10 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #80
w,dF under Guile and Gauche
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:32:59 -0700
Stephen Lewis <[email protected]> • #79
Fixed fix of ~w,dF
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:22:33 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #78
Format fix
Sun, 05 Jun 2005 16:51:27 +0200
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #77
Re: ~w,dF parameter
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:27:47 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #76
~w,dF parameter
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:11:32 +0900
"soo" <[email protected]> • #75
Reference implementation update
Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:28:23 -0400
David Van Horn <[email protected]> • #74
Re: ~F parameter
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:09:41 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #73
Re: ~F parameter
12 Jun 2004 00:04:14 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #72
Re: ~F parameter
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:34:17 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #71
~F parameter
11 Jun 2004 20:49:39 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #70
Re: exponential number
Fri, 28 May 2004 10:51:31 -0400
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #69
Re: exponential number
Fri, 28 May 2004 05:33:57 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #68
Re: exponential number
28 May 2004 20:06:07 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #67
Re: exponential number
Thu, 27 May 2004 11:38:15 -0700
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #66
exponential number
27 May 2004 21:21:03 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #65
Re: round bug
23 May 2004 21:18:31 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #64
Re: round bug
Wed, 12 May 2004 06:30:20 -0700
Per Bothner <[email protected]> • #63
Re: round bug
12 May 2004 22:26:37 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #62
Re: Why only left padding?
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:40:50 +0100
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #61
Why only left padding?
06 Mar 2004 21:44:50 +0900
soo <tilde-sjIBUsKPbG/7Za/[email protected]> • #60
Final SRFI 48: Intermediate Format Strings
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:34:25 +0100 (NFT)
srfi-editors-D5jPTyc31mpbJb6xxNauyti2O/[email protected] • #59
Re: Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:50:09 +0100
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #58
Re: New draft
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:29:06 +0100
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #57
Re: Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:17:13 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #56
Re: New draft
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:04:11 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #55
Re: Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:48:43 -0500
Taylor Campbell <[email protected]> • #54
New draft
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:31:13 +0000
Francisco Solsona <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Another alternative
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:08:37 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #52
Re: Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:22:57 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #51
customizing write-char (was Re: Format strings are wrong)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:07:10 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #50
Re: Another alternative
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:01:09 -1000 (HST)
Shiro Kawai <[email protected]> • #49
Re: Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:36:52 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #48
Re: Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:01:06 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #47
Another alternative (Re: format strings are the Right Thing)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:55:32 -1000 (HST)
Shiro Kawai <[email protected]> • #46
Re: format strings are the Right Thing
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:52:39 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #45
[IGNORABLE] Scruffies vs Neats
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:18:30 +0100
Ken Dickey <[email protected]> • #44
Re: what is scheme's formal refinement/extension philosophy? (Re: Format strings are wrong)
29 Dec 2003 06:37:58 -0500
Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn-qr/[email protected]> • #43
Re: Format strings are wrong
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:06:33 +0900
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #42
Re: format strings are the Right Thing
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lord <lord-1tv/[email protected]> • #41
Re: Format strings are wrong (observation feedback)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:52:26 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #40
Re: Format strings are wrong
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 23:52:03 -0500
Taylor Campbell <[email protected]> • #39
Re: LAMBDA: The Ultimate Formatter (was Re: Format strings are wrong)
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 23:18:55 -0500
Taylor Campbell <[email protected]> • #38
format strings are the Right Thing
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:04:30 +0900
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #37
Re: Format strings are wrong
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:44:06 +0900
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #36
Re: Format strings are wrong
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:34:16 +0900
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #35
Re: LAMBDA: The Ultimate Formatter (was Re: Format strings are wrong)
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:06:37 +0900
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #34
what is scheme's formal refinement/extension philosophy? (Re: Format strings are wrong)
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:15:32 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #33
Re: Format strings are wrong
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 16:24:01 -0500
Taylor Campbell <[email protected]> • #32
Re: Format strings are wrong
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:24:09 -0500
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #31
LAMBDA: The Ultimate Formatter (was Re: Format strings are wrong)
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 02:17:10 -0500
Taylor Campbell <[email protected]> • #30
Re: Format strings are wrong
Sat, 27 Dec 2003 22:37:44 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #29
Re: Format strings are wrong
Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:21:55 +0100
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #28
Re: Format strings are wrong
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:36:33 +0100
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #27
Re: Format strings are wrong
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:36:08 +0100
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #26
Re: Format strings are wrong
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:35:41 +0100
Paul Schlie <[email protected]> • #25
Re: floating point and other comments
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:26:04 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #24
Re: floating point and other comments
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:23:19 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #23
Re: floating point and other comments
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:38:20 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #22
Re: pretty-print and ~C
Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:21:01 -0600
Alex Shinn <[email protected]> • #21
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.