gmane.mail.exim.devel archive

419 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: [exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:58:47 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16115
Re: [exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:47:11 +0100
beber via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16114
Re: [exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:00:54 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16113
Re: [exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:16:36 +0100
beber via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16112
Re: [exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:59:11 +0100
Bertrand Jacquin via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16111
Re: [exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:16:39 +0100 (BST)
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16110
[exim/exim] smtp: allow LMTP over SSL-on-connect (PR #3238)
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 22:28:31 +0100
beber via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16109
Re: [exim/exim] Which part is referred by "<string1> first has the part after any change-of-list-separator"? (Issue #3237)
Tue, 11 Aug 2026 22:39:44 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16108
Re: [exim/exim] Which part is referred by "<string1> first has the part after any change-of-list-separator"? (Issue #3237)
Tue, 11 Aug 2026 22:07:27 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16107
[exim/exim] Which part is referred by "<string1> first has the part after any change-of-list-separator"? (Issue #3237)
Tue, 11 Aug 2026 21:48:59 +0100
maeqs5a via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16106
Re: [exim/exim] system filter, multiple recipients, extra > prefix in actual recipient address (Issue #1312)
Sat, 08 Aug 2026 11:47:44 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16105
Re: [exim/exim] system filter, multiple recipients, extra > prefix in actual recipient address (Issue #1312)
Sat, 08 Aug 2026 11:47:43 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16104
[exim/exim] Remove out of date information from acknowledgements (PR #3236)
Sat, 08 Aug 2026 11:04:39 +0100
mike via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16103
Re: [exim/exim] partially broken bounce_message_file and warn_message_file functionality (Issue #1877)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:48:17 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16102
Re: [exim/exim] expand protocol option on the smtp transport (Issue #2026)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:46:36 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16101
Re: [exim/exim] expand protocol option on the smtp transport (Issue #2026)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:46:37 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16100
Re: [exim/exim] exim attempt to link -lnsl even with NIS support disabled under musl-libc (Issue #1564)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:50:35 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16099
Re: [exim/exim] NIS support is broken with the latest glibc (Issue #2225)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:30:42 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16098
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:27:30 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16097
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:27:31 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16096
Re: [exim/exim] DoS In Proxy Protocol v2 handling (Issue #2957)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:22:23 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16095
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Handling of mis-encoded RFC2047 parts in address headers (Issue #3232)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:17:47 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16094
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Handling of mis-encoded RFC2047 parts in address headers (Issue #3232)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:17:46 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16093
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Outdated license grant statements refer to outdated FSF addresses (Issue #3234)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:16:30 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16092
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Outdated license grant statements refer to outdated FSF addresses (Issue #3234)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:16:30 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16091
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:15:09 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16090
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:22:59 +0100
minusbat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16089
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:01:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16088
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:01:05 +0100
okryvulia via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16087
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:52:19 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16086
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:36:37 +0100
okryvulia via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16085
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:43:45 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16084
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:00:37 +0100
minusbat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16083
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set uid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:45:00 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16082
[exim/exim] [Bug]: A userforward which saves to a file and then delivers fails to set aid under heavy load (Issue #3235)
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 21:17:56 +0100
minusbat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16081
Re: [patch] Stop refering to (outdated) FSF postal address
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 11:32:37 +0200
Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16080
[exim/exim] [Bug]: Outdated license grant statements refer to outdated FSF addresses (Issue #3234)
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:31:09 +0100
ametzler via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16079
Re: [exim/exim] Remove NIS/NISplus support (Issue #3206)
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:04:31 +0100
toolsmith via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16078
Re: [Patch] Drop -lnsl from GNU/Hurd default LIBS.
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 09:53:35 +0100
Bernard Quatermass via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16077
[Patch] Drop -lnsl from GNU/Hurd default LIBS.
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:55:19 +0200
Andreas Metzler via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16076
Possible SMTP command line length conformance issue in Exim 4.99.4
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:30:54 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
曹博程 via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16075
Re: [exim/exim] local_from_check influences local and TCP submitted messages (Issue #1343)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:29:40 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16074
Re: [exim/exim] local_from_check influences local and TCP submitted messages (Issue #1343)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:29:40 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16073
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: the link is correct but its section number is wrongly displayed after html formating (Issue #3219)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:55:07 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16072
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: Example has a feature which is referred to as new, and discussed, a few sub sections afterwards (Issue #3218)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:54:08 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16071
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: the link is correct but its section number is wrongly displayed after html formating (Issue #3219)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:55:08 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16070
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: Example has a feature which is referred to as new, and discussed, a few sub sections afterwards (Issue #3218)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:54:07 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16069
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: host_lookup not applied for client addresses passed via proxy protocol (Issue #3221)
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:52:45 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16068
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: ARC signature verification fails if one signed header name is a prefix of another (Issue #3222)
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:37:04 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
213220597--- via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16067
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: ARC signature verification fails if one signed header name is a prefix of another (Issue #3222)
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:50:26 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16066
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: ${utf8_domain_to_alabel:} does not validate result (Issue #3226)
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:03:23 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16065
Re: [exim/exim] Cross-compiling is broken (Issue #3170)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:02:26 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16064
Re: [exim/exim] ch-domain_host_address_and_local_part_lists.html#SECTlistexpand : Referring to 6.17 and 6.18 too, not just 6.20 and 6.22 (Issue #2719)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:59:47 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16063
Re: [exim/exim] Should have referenced the previous section, that is 10.15. Not the current one, which is 10.16 (Issue #2755)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:00:59 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16062
Re: [exim/exim] Should have referenced the previous section, that is 10.15. Not the current one, which is 10.16 (Issue #2755)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:00:59 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16061
Re: [exim/exim] ch-domain_host_address_and_local_part_lists.html#SECTlistexpand : Referring to 6.17 and 6.18 too, not just 6.20 and 6.22 (Issue #2719)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:59:46 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16060
Re: [exim/exim] expand protocol option on the smtp transport (Issue #2026)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:41:01 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16059
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:00:30 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16058
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 17:27:11 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16057
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 01:45:50 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16056
Re: [exim/exim] expand protocol option on the smtp transport (Issue #2026)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 16:14:36 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16055
Re: [exim/exim] Need testcases for nisplus lookup (Issue #2212)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:06:45 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16054
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:25:02 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16053
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:18:09 +1000
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16052
Re: [exim/exim] tls_eccurve does not accept multiple entries (Issue #2298)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:13:33 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16051
Re: [exim/exim] [PATCH] exim should not call arc4random_stir on FreeBSD (Issue #2304)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:10:34 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16050
Re: [exim/exim] [PATCH] exim should not call arc4random_stir on FreeBSD (Issue #2304)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:10:34 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16049
Re: [exim/exim] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one (Issue #2987)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:47:50 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16048
Re: [exim/exim] $spam_score_int calculation for negative values is off-by-one (Issue #2987)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:47:50 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16047
Re: [exim/exim] Distinct tags with same first letter overwrite each other (Issue #3056)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:46:05 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16046
Re: [exim/exim] Distinct tags with same first letter overwrite each other (Issue #3056)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:46:04 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16045
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: exim-be can't place $ in a tainted variable (Issue #3224)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:32:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16044
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: exim-be can't place $ in a tainted variable (Issue #3224)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:32:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16043
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Handling of mis-encoded RFC2047 parts in address headers (Issue #3232)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:29:23 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16042
Re: [exim/exim] Support RFC8460 TLS SMTP Report (TLSRPT) (Issue #3132)
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:05:21 +0100
lucaat via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16041
Re: [exim/exim] Support RFC8460 TLS SMTP Report (TLSRPT) (Issue #3132)
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:17:41 +0100
AndrewAitchison via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16040
Possible SMTP command line length conformance issue in Exim 4.99.4
Wed, 8 Jul 2026 22:25:50 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
曹博程 via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16039
Re: Possible SMTP command line length conformance issue in Exim 4.99.4
Wed, 8 Jul 2026 09:36:17 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16038
Re: Possible SMTP command line length conformance issue in Exim 4.99.4
Wed, 8 Jul 2026 09:34:09 +0100
Bernard Quatermass via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16037
Possible SMTP command line length conformance issue in Exim 4.99.4
Wed, 8 Jul 2026 11:45:36 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
曹博程 via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16036
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: exim-be can't place $ in a tainted variable (Issue #3224)
Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:46:09 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16035
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: exim-be can't place $ in a tainted variable (Issue #3224)
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:03:58 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16034
Re: [exim/exim] Doc: the link is correct but its section number is wrongly displayed after html formating (Issue #3219)
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:33:21 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16033
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Incorrect link in Chapter 9 documentation (Issue #3223)
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 11:18:43 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16032
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Mishandled errno in exim_fchown(journal_fd) (Issue #3209)
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:49:35 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16031
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Mishandled errno in exim_fchown(journal_fd) (Issue #3209)
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:49:35 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16030
Re: [exim/exim] [RFE] Docs should consistently hyperlink RFCs (Issue #3233)
Sun, 05 Jul 2026 11:26:07 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16029
Re: [exim/exim] [RFE] Docs should consistently hyperlink RFCs (Issue #3233)
Sun, 05 Jul 2026 11:26:07 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16028
Re: [exim/exim] Add the sieve 'body' test (Issue #740)
Fri, 03 Jul 2026 19:03:52 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16027
Re: [exim/exim] Support for Sendmail milters (Issue #378)
Thu, 02 Jul 2026 22:42:25 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16026
[exim/exim] [RFE] Docs should consistently hyperlink RFCs (Issue #3233)
Thu, 02 Jul 2026 17:42:29 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16025
Re: Question about PIPECONNECT advertised as an EHLO extension in Exim 4.99.4
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:18:07 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16024
Re: Question about PIPECONNECT advertised as an EHLO extension in Exim 4.99.4
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:01:23 +0100 (BST)
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16023
Re: Question about PIPECONNECT advertised as an EHLO extension in Exim 4.99.4
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:15:36 +0100
Jeremy Harris via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16022
Question about PIPECONNECT advertised as an EHLO extension in Exim 4.99.4
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:48:17 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
曹博程 via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16021
Re: [exim/exim] Generic variable containing the item looked for in a (query-style) lookup (Issue #459)
Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:41:26 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16020
Re: [exim/exim] Generic variable containing the item looked for in a (query-style) lookup (Issue #459)
Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:24:12 +0100
"martin.von.wittich via Exim-dev" <[email protected]> • #16019
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: Handling of mis-encoded RFC2047 parts in address headers (Issue #3232)
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:58:57 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16018
[exim/exim] [Bug]: Handling of mis-encoded RFC2047 parts in address headers (Issue #3232)
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:48:12 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16017
Re: [exim/exim] [Bug]: DMARC always return norecord (Accept) for any police in subdomain bacause bug in opendmarc (#3090) (Issue #3231)
Sat, 06 Jun 2026 15:43:48 +0100
jgh via Exim-dev <[email protected]> • #16016
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.