gmane.mail.postfix.user archive
438 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →
[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:57:47 -0400[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:54:06 -0400[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:35:50 -0400[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:31:14 +0100[pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alternative TLS backend?
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:36:11 +1000[pfx] Re: smtp_tls_session_cache_database and database format
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:00:34 +1000[pfx] Re: smtp_tls_session_cache_database and database format
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:49:32 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] smtp_tls_session_cache_database and database format
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:21:49 +0200[pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alterna tive TLS backend?
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:50:20 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as a n alternative TLS backend?
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:56:27 +0530[pfx] Re: OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an alterna tive TLS backend?
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:16:37 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] OpenSSL 3.5.x TLS handshake overhead on AL2023 vs AL2 (OpenSSL 1.0.2) — any interest in AWS-LC as an al ternative TLS backend?
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:38:14 +0000 (UTC)[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:50:01 -0700[pfx] Pflogsumm Version 1.2.2alpha02 Released
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 16:05:06 -0400[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:43:50 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:43:30 -0700[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 10:12:36 +0200[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:36:36 +0200[pfx] Pflogsumm Version 1.2.2alpha01 Released
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:09:01 -0400[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:47:48 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:45:49 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:29:06 -0700[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:31:42 +0100[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:18:57 +0200[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:56:26 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:39:08 +0200[pfx] Incompatibility with LMDB 1.0
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:12:07 -0400[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:27:32 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:08:00 +0200[pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:59:46 +0200[pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:17:37 -0400[pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:41:08 +0200[pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:28:25 +0200[pfx] Re: Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:39:44 +0200[pfx] Dynamic content filter allows for forged mails to be signed with DKIM
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:48:32 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 21:54:37 +0100[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:35:32 +0100[pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.6 and legacy releases 3.10.13, 3.9.14, 3.8.20, 3.7.22, 3.6.20, 3.5.27
Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:50:35 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:25:06 +0200[pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database?
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:27:04 -0400[pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database?
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 22:19:11 +1000[pfx] Re: fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database?
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 08:06:02 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] fatal: dict_sqlite_lookup: [...] SQL prepare failed: attempt to write a readonly database?
Sun, 9 Aug 2026 13:39:33 +0200[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:58:29 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:38:29 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:35:01 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 18:14:45 +0100[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Sat, 8 Aug 2026 02:47:16 +1000[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 07 Aug 2026 12:40:39 -0400[pfx] Re: certificates (was: New to Postfix, Google problems)
Sat, 8 Aug 2026 02:31:50 +1000[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 18:23:12 +0200[pfx] Re: certificates (was: New to Postfix, Google problems)
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:17:46 +0000[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 11:57:20 -0400[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:48:09 +0100[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:46:51 +0100[pfx] Re: SMTPUTF8
Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:04:42 +0200[pfx] Heads-up for Postfix distribution maintainers
Thu, 6 Aug 2026 15:26:33 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:17:57 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:10:12 +0200[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 07:45:35 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:46:16 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 19:12:52 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 17:14:39 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 19:34:55 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 18:16:33 +0200[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:19:43 +0200[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:16:36 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:04:49 +0300[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:10:46 +0200[pfx] Re: content_filter on ipv6 ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:09:11 +0200[pfx] content_filter on ipv6 ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:01:01 +0200[pfx] Re: New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:42:44 -0400[pfx] New to Postfix, Google problems
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:11:08 +0100[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 04:29:44 +0000[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:12:43 +1000[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:06:00 -0400[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:29:37 +0000[pfx] Re: 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 23:50:05 +1000[pfx] 2 Default postfix instances
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:50:04 +0000[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:30:12 -0400[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:22:40 +0200[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:23:12 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:41:39 +0200[pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:38:53 -0700[pfx] Re: transport map multiple nexthop with ip address
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:32:21 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] transport map multiple nexthop with ip address
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:06:41 -0700[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:34:15 -0400[pfx] Re: Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:06:00 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:50:10 +0200[pfx] Question about the parameter: permit_mx_backup_networks
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:31:58 +0200[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:49:05 -0400[pfx] Re: destination_rate_delay
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:33:21 +1000[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:31:22 +1000[pfx] destination_rate_delay
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:59:04 +0200[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:09:44 -0400[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:01:09 +0200[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:55:38 +0200[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:16:18 -0400[pfx] Re: dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:03:07 -0400 (EDT)[pfx] dual-algo (rsa & ec) dkim signing of pfx-outbound mail -- incorrect receipt @ gmail. pfx, dkimpy or gmail issue?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:05:34 -0400
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.