gmane.mail.spam.camram archive

35 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 1). Latest articles →

early warning notice
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:03:11 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #566
Re: how many bits / how to negotiate (Re: Re: stampcreation std. deviation)
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:20:33 -0500 (CDT)
"John Honan" <[email protected]> • #563
Re: stamp creation std. deviation
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:55:08 -0400
Jean-Luc Cooke <[email protected]> • #561
Re: how many bits / how to negotiate (Re: Re: stamp creation std. deviation)
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:51:58 -0400
Jean-Luc Cooke <[email protected]> • #560
how many bits / how to negotiate (Re: Re: stamp creation std. deviation)
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:51:24 -0400
Adam Back <[email protected]> • #558
Re: stamp creation std. deviation
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:23:59 -0400
Jean-Luc Cooke <[email protected]> • #557
Re: stamp creation std. deviation
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:24:10 -0500 (CDT)
"John Honan" <[email protected]> • #556
Re: stamp creation std. deviation
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:08:26 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #555
Anti-Spam Conference, Mountain View, CA, July 30-31
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] ("Hal Finney") • #553
more press
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:23:38 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #552
camram 0.3 announcement
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:13:16 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #549
pseudo blog 11-Jun-2004
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:14:36 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #548
Re: Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
Mon, 24 May 2004 21:43:40 +0200 (CEST)
Anonymous <[email protected]> • #547
Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
Mon, 24 May 2004 10:56:45 +0200 (CEST)
Anonymous <[email protected]> • #546
Re: camram-like system
Sat, 22 May 2004 15:33:50 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #545
camram-like system
Sat, 22 May 2004 10:43:00 -0400
Adam Back <[email protected]> • #544
pseudo blog 17-May-2004
Mon, 17 May 2004 14:31:37 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #543
Re: mozilla camram/hashcash discussion (Re: [Bug 229686] Request : Support for HashCash type of SPAM protection)
Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:57:59 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #541
mozilla camram/hashcash discussion (Re: [Bug 229686] Request : Support for HashCash type of SPAM protection)
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 08:09:51 -0400
Adam Back <[email protected]> • #540
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Re: Friday news
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:24:04 -0800
Steve Schear <[email protected]> • #539
Re: Friday news
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:06:20 -0500
Adam Back <[email protected]> • #537
Friday browsing
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:46:31 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #535
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:53:20 -0500
[email protected] • #497
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:11:47 -0800
Bill Stewart <[email protected]> • #496
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:01:27 -0500
"R. A. Hettinga" <[email protected]> • #495
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:46:14 +0000
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> • #490
Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:41:19 -0500 (EST)
Jerrold Leichter <[email protected]> • #489
Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:29:27 -0500
Adam Back <[email protected]> • #474
Re: Big Companies Add to Spam
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:26:59 -0800
Dennis Gearon <[email protected]> • #99
Big Companies Add to Spam
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:43:21 -0800
Steve Schear <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Forbes: Pay up
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:13:04 +0100
Matt <[email protected]> • #97
Re: Forbes: Pay up
Wed, 2 Jul 2003 21:27:17 -0400
Barry Shein <[email protected]> • #96
6. Solutions - E-postage (was Re: Forbes: Pay up)
Wed, 02 Jul 2003 19:59:15 -0400
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #95
Re: Forbes: Pay up
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 00:46:44 +0100
"Roy S. Walker" <[email protected]> • #94
Forbes: Pay up
Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:16:16 -0700
Steve Schear <[email protected]> • #93
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.