gmane.mail.spam.dspam.devel

5215 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

I have a patch, what's the procedure for getting it approved?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:05:03 -0600
dspam-devel--- via Dspam-devel <[email protected]> • #5215
What is the status of development?
Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:40:47 -0700
[email protected] • #5214
Re: Kqueue
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:39:27 +0200
[email protected] • #5213
Re: Kqueue
Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:11:05 +0100
dspam-devel--- via Dspam-devel <[email protected]> • #5212
Re: Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 16:04:49 -0600
[email protected] • #5211
Re: Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 16:03:12 -0600
[email protected] • #5210
Re: Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 21:56:42 +0100
dspam-devel--- via Dspam-devel <[email protected]> • #5209
Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 06:14:38 +0000
[email protected] • #5208
rabl
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 03:58:04 +0200
[email protected] • #5207
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:24:11 -0600
[email protected] • #5206
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:02:58 +0000
[email protected] • #5205
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:57:36 +0000
[email protected] • #5204
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:50:59 -0600
[email protected] • #5203
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:00:00 +0000
[email protected] • #5202
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 03:00:13 +0000
[email protected] • #5201
TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:03:09 -0600
[email protected] • #5200
About how to properly obtain a signature from LIBDSPAM 3.10.x
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:19:35 -0300
Helio Luchtenberg Jr <[email protected]> • #5199
Re: Leaving dspam project
Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:21:10 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5198
Re: Leaving dspam project
Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:56:29 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5197
Re: Leaving dspam project
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:24:41 -0700
Terry Barnum <[email protected]> • #5196
Re: Leaving dspam project
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 22:08:33 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #5195
Leaving dspam project
Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:04:24 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5194
Re: improving dspam
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:09:19 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5193
Re: improving dspam
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:49:09 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5192
Re: improving dspam
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:51:41 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5191
improving dspam
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:05:05 +0100
kael <[email protected]> • #5190
Re: Status of development of dspam
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:41:01 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5189
Re: Status of development of dspam
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:28:31 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5188
Status of development of dspam
Tue, 26 Nov 2013 22:34:12 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5187
Massive Scoring differences in Versions
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:20:17 +0200 (CEST)
bofh <[email protected]> • #5186
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:39:46 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5185
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:23:23 -0500
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5184
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:58:18 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5183
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:13:31 -0500
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5182
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:37:24 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5181
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:13:27 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5180
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:28:57 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5179
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:26:21 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5178
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:06:00 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5177
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:51:56 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5176
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:18:16 +0200
"Thomas Preud'homme" <[email protected]> • #5175
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:10:25 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5174
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:53:04 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5173
PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:56:07 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5172
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-2943438 ] cssclean corrupts hashfile
Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:38:27 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5171
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3489939 ] BUG in DSPAM?
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:18:30 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5170
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3610192 ] Add IPv6 support
Sat, 06 Apr 2013 11:42:57 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5169
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3609004 ] Postgresql 9.2 vs INSERT INTO dspam_token_data duplicate key
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 05:41:11 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5168
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3536088 ] dot stuffing bug
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:00:03 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5167
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3536088 ] dot stuffing bug
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:26:54 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5166