gmane.mail.spam.dspam.devel archive

498 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →

I have a patch, what's the procedure for getting it approved?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:05:03 -0600
dspam-devel--- via Dspam-devel <[email protected]> • #5215
What is the status of development?
Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:40:47 -0700
[email protected] • #5214
Re: Kqueue
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:39:27 +0200
[email protected] • #5213
Re: Kqueue
Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:11:05 +0100
dspam-devel--- via Dspam-devel <[email protected]> • #5212
Re: Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 16:04:49 -0600
[email protected] • #5211
Re: Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 16:03:12 -0600
[email protected] • #5210
Re: Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 21:56:42 +0100
dspam-devel--- via Dspam-devel <[email protected]> • #5209
Kqueue
Tue, 1 Jan 2019 06:14:38 +0000
[email protected] • #5208
rabl
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 03:58:04 +0200
[email protected] • #5207
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:24:11 -0600
[email protected] • #5206
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:02:58 +0000
[email protected] • #5205
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:57:36 +0000
[email protected] • #5204
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:50:59 -0600
[email protected] • #5203
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:00:00 +0000
[email protected] • #5202
Re: TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 03:00:13 +0000
[email protected] • #5201
TrainPristine insufficient explanation in conf comments and debug logging
Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:03:09 -0600
[email protected] • #5200
About how to properly obtain a signature from LIBDSPAM 3.10.x
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:19:35 -0300
Helio Luchtenberg Jr <[email protected]> • #5199
Re: Leaving dspam project
Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:21:10 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5198
Re: Leaving dspam project
Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:56:29 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5197
Re: Leaving dspam project
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:24:41 -0700
Terry Barnum <[email protected]> • #5196
Re: Leaving dspam project
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 22:08:33 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #5195
Leaving dspam project
Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:04:24 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5194
Re: improving dspam
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:09:19 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5193
Re: improving dspam
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:49:09 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5192
Re: improving dspam
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:51:41 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5191
improving dspam
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:05:05 +0100
kael <[email protected]> • #5190
Re: Status of development of dspam
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:41:01 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5189
Re: Status of development of dspam
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:28:31 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5188
Status of development of dspam
Tue, 26 Nov 2013 22:34:12 +0800
Thomas Preud'homme <[email protected]> • #5187
Massive Scoring differences in Versions
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:20:17 +0200 (CEST)
bofh <[email protected]> • #5186
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:39:46 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5185
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:23:23 -0500
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5184
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:58:18 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5183
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:13:31 -0500
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5182
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:37:24 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5181
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:13:27 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5180
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:28:57 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5179
Re: PgSQL query warning
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:26:21 -0700
David Rees <[email protected]> • #5178
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:06:00 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5177
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:51:56 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5176
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:18:16 +0200
"Thomas Preud'homme" <[email protected]> • #5175
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:10:25 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5174
Re: PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:53:04 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5173
PgSQL query warning
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:56:07 +0200
Chris Moules <[email protected]> • #5172
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-2943438 ] cssclean corrupts hashfile
Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:38:27 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5171
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3489939 ] BUG in DSPAM?
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:18:30 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5170
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3610192 ] Add IPv6 support
Sat, 06 Apr 2013 11:42:57 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5169
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3609004 ] Postgresql 9.2 vs INSERT INTO dspam_token_data duplicate key
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 05:41:11 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5168
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3536088 ] dot stuffing bug
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:00:03 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5167
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3536088 ] dot stuffing bug
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:26:54 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5166
Odd shared library-global variable problem on Mac OS X?
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:14:55 -0700
Jesse Peterson <[email protected]> • #5165
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3607521 ] Active loop in daemon could be avoided
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:51:57 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5164
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3536088 ] dot stuffing bug
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:32:22 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5163
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3605628 ] Unsafe use of strcpy in dspam.c
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:22:10 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5162
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3605197 ] problem with email retraining
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:55:20 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5161
[PATCH] Fix building modules
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:19:34 +0100
Andreas Schneider <[email protected]> • #5160
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3605201 ] problem with email retraining
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:06:28 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5159
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3605201 ] problem with email retraining
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:05:12 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5158
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3605197 ] problem with email retraining
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:42:36 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5157
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3603022 ] False DSPAM headers confuse dspamc retraining
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:28:27 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5156
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3603022 ] False DSPAM headers confuse dspamc retraining
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:36:01 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5155
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3603022 ] False DSPAM headers confuse dspamc retraining
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:25:45 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5154
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3603022 ] False DSPAM headers confuse dspamc retraining
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:15:16 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5153
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3603022 ] False DSPAM headers confuse dspamc retraining
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:32:22 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5152
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3603022 ] False DSPAM headers confuse dspamc retraining
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:22:32 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5151
Re: More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:10:24 +0100
Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> • #5150
Re: More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:34 -0600
"Tod A. Sandman" <[email protected]> • #5149
Re: More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:10:21 +0000
Paul Cockings <[email protected]> • #5148
Re: More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:28:35 +0200
Jani Partanen <[email protected]> • #5147
Why no overflow in dspam.c:503
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:56 +0100
"Thomas Preud'homme" <[email protected]> • #5146
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3600364 ] Problem releasing quarantined email
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:21:11 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5145
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3600364 ] Problem releasing quarantined email
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:00:09 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5144
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3600364 ] Problem releasing quarantined email
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:46:19 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5143
Re: More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:33:23 -0600
Troy Ayers <[email protected]> • #5142
Re: More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:59:26 -0600
Troy Ayers <[email protected]> • #5141
More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 19:24:00 -0600
"Tod A. Sandman" <[email protected]> • #5140
Re: Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:01:20 -0600
Troy Ayers <[email protected]> • #5139
Re: Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:39:06 +0100
Stevan Bajić <[email protected]> • #5138
Re: Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:23:01 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5137
Re: Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:34:25 -0600
"Tod A. Sandman" <[email protected]> • #5136
Re: Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:26:58 -0600
Troy Ayers <[email protected]> • #5135
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3592411 ] Encoded headers
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:39:47 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5134
Blocklisting documentation?
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:38:58 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5133
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3413998 ] DSPAM broken after upgrade to PostgreSQL 9.1
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:07:35 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5132
Re: Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:37:47 -0600
"Tod A. Sandman" <[email protected]> • #5131
Patches for dspam.cgi
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:34:44 -0600
"Tod A. Sandman" <[email protected]> • #5130
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3592411 ] Encoded headers
Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:39:49 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5129
Fwd: Re: DSPAM: information about a specific commit
Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:45:31 +0100
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #5128
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3587929 ] DSpam Thunderbird plugin not compatible with Thunderbird 16
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:08:54 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5127
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3587926 ] DSpam Thunderbird plugin not compatible with Thunderbird 16
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:36:58 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5126
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3587929 ] DSpam Thunderbird plugin not compatible with Thunderbird 16
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:40:42 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5125
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3587926 ] DSpam Thunderbird plugin not compatible with Thunderbird 16
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:24:29 -0800
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5124
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3572691 ] long line in message body causes error 530
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:35:05 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5123
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3572691 ] long line in message body causes error 530
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:10:38 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5122
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3574053 ] leading &nbsp; in users admin list
Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:14:27 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5121
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3574053 ] &nbsp; in users admin list
Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:13:49 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5120
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3574053 ] &nbso; in users admin list
Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:13:08 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5119
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3574053 ] &nbsp; in users admin list
Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:13:22 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5118
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3573030 ] dspam 3.10.2
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:51:11 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5117
[ dspam-Bug Tracker-3573030 ] dspam 3.10.2
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:49:58 -0700
SourceForge.net <[email protected]> • #5116
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.