gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general archive

782 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 8). Latest articles →

Re: Does anybody have rules that can block these type of emails?
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:10:16 +0200
[email protected] • #168633
Re: Does anybody have rules that can block these type of emails?
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:05:48 -0400
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168632
Re: SA 4.0.x: extracting a phishing URL buried 4 decode layers deep -- in a base64 HTML attachment wrapping a data: URI PDF?
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:58:00 +0200
[email protected] • #168631
Re: Does anybody have rules that can block these type of emails?
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:18:02 +0200
[email protected] • #168630
Re: Does anybody have rules that can block these type of emails?
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:09:18 +0200
[email protected] • #168629
Does anybody have rules that can block these type of emails?
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:03:17 -0400
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168628
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:54:17 +0200
[email protected] • #168627
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:58:35 +0200
Axb <[email protected]> • #168626
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:59:19 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168625
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:47:10 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #168624
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168623
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:43:48 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168622
SA 4.0.x: extracting a phishing URL buried 4 decode layers deep -- in a base64 HTML attachment wrapping a data: URI PDF?
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:14:24 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #168621
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168620
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:36:16 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168619
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168618
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:44:41 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168617
Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168616
spams using rb.gy redirector
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:36:42 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168615
Re: FPs with UPPERCASE_URI
Sun, 12 Jul 2026 13:10:18 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168614
Re: FPs with UPPERCASE_URI
Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168613
FPs with UPPERCASE_URI
Thu, 9 Jul 2026 16:38:46 +0000
"Lichtinger, Bernhard" <[email protected]> • #168612
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:07:37 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168611
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:01:05 -0400
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #168610
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:35:01 +0200
Ruud van den Hout <[email protected]> • #168609
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:31:56 -0400
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #168608
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:26:03 +0200
Ruud van den Hout <[email protected]> • #168607
Re: Sa-update no updates?
Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:23:10 +0200
Ruud van den Hout <[email protected]> • #168606
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:02:49 -0400
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #168605
Re: Sa-update no updates?
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:31:06 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168604
Re: URI canonicalization whitelist
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 15:34:05 +0200
Ruud van den Hout <[email protected]> • #168603
URI canonicalization whitelist
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:52:33 -0400
Michael Orlitzky <[email protected]> • #168602
Sa-update no updates?
Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:07:10 +0200
Ruud van den Hout <[email protected]> • #168601
Re: The status of the Rule QA system
Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:49:39 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168600
Re: testing corpus?
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:02:39 +0000
Rick Wesson <[email protected]> • #168599
Re: testing corpus?
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:54:47 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168598
testing corpus?
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 18:48:18 +0000
Rick Wesson <[email protected]> • #168597
Re: SA is inventing URIs
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 11:59:24 -0400
Alex <[email protected]> • #168596
Re: The status of the Rule QA system
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168595
Re: The status of the Rule QA system
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:38:30 +0200
Tom Hendrikx <[email protected]> • #168594
Re: The status of the Rule QA system
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 11:38:03 +0200
"Benny Pedersen via users" <[email protected]> • #168593
Re: The status of the Rule QA system
Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:43:16 -0400
Charles Sprickman <[email protected]> • #168592
Re: The status of the Rule QA system
Thu, 25 Jun 2026 21:53:47 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]> • #168591
The status of the Rule QA system
Thu, 25 Jun 2026 20:34:53 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168590
Re: SA is inventing URIs
Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168589
Re: SA is inventing URIs
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:22:01 -0400
Alex <[email protected]> • #168588
spamcop listing google
Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:18:07 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168587
Re: SA is inventing URIs
Sun, 21 Jun 2026 12:59:24 -0400
Alex <[email protected]> • #168586
Re: SA is inventing URIs
Sat, 20 Jun 2026 19:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168585
SA is inventing URIs
Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:08:44 -0400
Alex <[email protected]> • #168584
Re: failed to connect to rsync.spamassassin.org to submit masscheck results
Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:36:55 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168583
failed to connect to rsync.spamassassin.org to submit masscheck results
Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:43:21 +0200
Marcin MirosÅ‚aw <[email protected]> • #168582
Re: RE: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:38:05 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168581
RE: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:44:03 -0500
"Scott Techlist via users" <[email protected]> • #168580
Status of the DDoS on SA Infrastructure
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:21:55 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168579
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:51:25 +0000
Otto Cooper <[email protected]> • #168578
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:56:35 +0100
Andrew H <[email protected]> • #168577
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 13:52:16 -0700
Kirk Ismay <[email protected]> • #168576
Re: tflags publish <= What is this good for? (Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?)
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 07:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168575
Re: tflags publish <= What is this good for? (Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?)
Mon, 01 Jun 2026 10:06:04 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168574
Re: tflags publish <= What is this good for? (Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?)
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 15:27:04 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168573
Re: tflags publish <= What is this good for? (Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?)
Mon, 01 Jun 2026 09:08:33 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168572
tflags publish <= What is this good for? (Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?)
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:56:41 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168571
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 22:20:36 -0400
"Jared Hall via users" <[email protected]> • #168570
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 17:49:23 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt <[email protected]> • #168569
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 17:16:22 -0500
[email protected] • #168568
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 20:12:23 +0200
"Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users" <[email protected]> • #168567
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 10:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <[email protected]> • #168566
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 13:32:13 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168565
Re: Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Sat, 30 May 2026 12:39:54 -0400
Charles Sprickman <[email protected]> • #168564
Question about AI generated spam and prompts
Fri, 29 May 2026 21:07:47 -0700
"Tom Williams via users" <[email protected]> • #168563
Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5
Thu, 28 May 2026 19:07:38 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168562
Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5
Thu, 28 May 2026 22:00:52 +0200
Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> • #168561
Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts
Thu, 21 May 2026 16:47:13 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168560
Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts
Thu, 21 May 2026 13:50:26 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #168559
Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts
Wed, 20 May 2026 19:25:15 -0400
FalconChristopher <[email protected]> • #168558
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 19 May 2026 15:04:07 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168557
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 19 May 2026 08:28:12 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #168556
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 19 May 2026 13:19:48 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168555
Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts
Mon, 18 May 2026 23:17:53 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk <[email protected]> • #168554
SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts
Mon, 18 May 2026 19:09:49 -0400
FalconChristopher <[email protected]> • #168553
Re: TXREP gone wild?
Mon, 18 May 2026 18:23:14 +0200
Benjamin Block <[email protected]> • #168552
Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ?
Sun, 17 May 2026 21:03:56 +0200
"Arnaud de Prelle via users" <[email protected]> • #168551
Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ?
Sat, 16 May 2026 19:53:54 -0400
J Doe <[email protected]> • #168550
RE: Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ?
Fri, 15 May 2026 22:10:55 +0200
"Arnaud de Prelle via users" <[email protected]> • #168549
Re: Fake emails from [email protected].
Thu, 14 May 2026 12:39:39 -0400
Charles Sprickman <[email protected]> • #168548
Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ?
Wed, 13 May 2026 19:13:18 -0600
Tom Bartel <[email protected]> • #168547
Re: Fake emails from [email protected].
Wed, 13 May 2026 16:52:36 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk <[email protected]> • #168546
Re: Fake emails from [email protected].
Wed, 13 May 2026 22:57:53 +0200
"Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users" <[email protected]> • #168545
Fake emails from [email protected].
Wed, 13 May 2026 16:26:39 -0400
Mark London <[email protected]> • #168544
Re: Redirectors Plugin vs. google maps => consent.google.com
Wed, 13 May 2026 16:48:04 +0200
[email protected] • #168543
Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok
Tue, 12 May 2026 13:14:39 -0400
Bill Cole <[email protected]> • #168542
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 12 May 2026 16:50:07 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168541
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 12 May 2026 16:37:08 +0200
[email protected] • #168540
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 12 May 2026 16:36:16 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168539
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 12 May 2026 16:22:39 +0200
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #168538
Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header?
Tue, 12 May 2026 16:04:20 +0200
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168537
Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok
Tue, 12 May 2026 15:53:33 +0200
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168536
Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok
Tue, 12 May 2026 15:41:59 +0200
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> • #168535
Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok
Tue, 12 May 2026 15:19:51 +0200
Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> • #168534
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.