gmane.network.dns.bind.user archive

422 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: resolution problems due to timeouts on dig / servfail (aw-systems.net)
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:30:58 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #69159
Re: resolution problems due to timeouts on dig / servfail (aw-systems.net)
Wed, 3 Jun 2026 23:30:35 -0700
Crist Clark <[email protected]> • #69158
Re: resolution problems due to timeouts on dig / servfail (aw-systems.net)
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 08:19:11 +0200
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #69157
resolution problems due to timeouts on dig / servfail (aw-systems.net)
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 07:28:32 +0200
Florian Piekert via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69156
Re: /run/named permission denied
Wed, 3 Jun 2026 13:46:55 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69155
Re: /run/named permission denied
Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:47:22 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69154
Re: /run/named permission denied
Wed, 3 Jun 2026 07:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
Colin Vidal <[email protected]> • #69153
/run/named permission denied
Wed, 3 Jun 2026 09:23:47 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69152
Re: root servers + session-keyfile
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:41:56 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69151
Re: named.rfc1912.zones
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:22:20 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69150
root servers + session-keyfile
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:14:46 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69149
Re: named.rfc1912.zones
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:09:26 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69148
named.rfc1912.zones
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:04:07 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69147
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:50:19 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69146
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Fri, 29 May 2026 18:55:07 +0200 (CEST)
Havard Eidnes via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69145
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 06:36:32 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #69144
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 07:32:12 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #69143
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 07:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #69142
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 07:24:04 +0200
Carlos Horowicz via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69141
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 06:00:58 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69140
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 10:13:23 +1000
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #69139
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Thu, 28 May 2026 16:18:26 -0400
Darren Ankney <[email protected]> • #69138
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 07:40:13 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #69137
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 10:30:25 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69136
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 09:24:41 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69135
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 09:42:48 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69134
BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Thu, 28 May 2026 09:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #69133
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 07:58:22 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69132
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 08:43:46 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69131
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 07:08:07 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69130
named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 08:00:21 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69129
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 19:26:12 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69128
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 19:02:21 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69127
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 12:52:47 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #69126
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 16:16:47 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69125
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 14:58:51 +0000
Carsten Strotmann via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69124
Compiling BIND 9.22.21+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 14:35:22 +0000
Carsten Strotmann via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69123
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Tue, 19 May 2026 14:47:18 +0200
Petr Menšík via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69122
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Thu, 7 May 2026 09:01:13 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69121
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Thu, 7 May 2026 08:56:43 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69120
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:09:13 +0100
Greg <[email protected]> • #69119
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:57:25 +0200
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #69118
new Bind server and bind rpm package
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:48:08 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #69117
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Wed, 6 May 2026 08:31:17 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69116
Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 23:26:28 -0700
Mark Strohm <[email protected]> • #69115
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Wed, 6 May 2026 05:55:14 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69114
Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 17:41:14 -0700
Mark Strohm <[email protected]> • #69113
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 18:36:57 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69112
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 17:26:02 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69111
Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 08:56:12 -0700
Mark Strohm <[email protected]> • #69110
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 17:14:38 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69109
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 16:07:37 +0100
Greg <[email protected]> • #69108
RE: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 15:04:01 +0000
[email protected] • #69107
Re: Request for clarification on the functionality of BIND 9.18.37 /9.20.22
Tue, 5 May 2026 06:56:09 -0700
Crist Clark <[email protected]> • #69106
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 15:27:35 +0200
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #69105
Request for clarification on the functionality of BIND 9.18.37 /9.20.22
Tue, 05 May 2026 18:38:25 +0530
Kishore Karthikeyan A T via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69104
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 13:04:03 +0100
Greg <[email protected]> • #69103
IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 11:41:22 +0000
[email protected] • #69102
RE: BIND 9.21.20: DNS Error Reporting Logging and Resolver IP Addresses
Tue, 5 May 2026 07:36:21 -0400
Scott Hollenbeck via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69101
Re: BIND 9.21.20: DNS Error Reporting Logging and Resolver IP Addresses
Tue, 5 May 2026 10:58:14 +0200
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #69100
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Tue, 5 May 2026 10:09:52 +0300
Ibrahim Almahfooz <[email protected]> • #69099
Re: DoT answers only for loopback interface
Tue, 5 May 2026 08:57:33 +0200
poubeline--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69098
Re: DoT answers only for loopback interface
Mon, 4 May 2026 21:01:22 +0200
Sten Carlsen via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69097
Re: DoT answers only for loopback interface
Mon, 4 May 2026 17:12:22 +0200
poubeline--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69096
DoT answers only for loopback interface
Mon, 4 May 2026 16:28:24 +0200
poubeline--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69095
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 15:50:34 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #69094
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 20:42:32 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69093
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 15:38:53 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #69092
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 20:28:11 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69091
BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 14:51:58 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #69090
Re: DoT forwarder: controlling timeout before fallback to recursion ?
Sun, 3 May 2026 14:05:47 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #69089
Re: DoT forwarder: controlling timeout before fallback to recursion ?
Sun, 03 May 2026 13:37:32 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #69088
DoT forwarder: controlling timeout before fallback to recursion ?
Sun, 3 May 2026 09:48:55 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #69087
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 12:06:17 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69086
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 12:58:16 +0300
Ibrahim Almahfooz <[email protected]> • #69085
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 09:54:19 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69084
BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 10:39:21 +0300
Ibrahim Almahfooz <[email protected]> • #69083
BIND 9.21.20: DNS Error Reporting Logging and Resolver IP Addresses
Sat, 2 May 2026 11:22:07 -0400
Scott Hollenbeck via bind-users <[email protected]> • #69082
Re: BIND 9.21.21: Problem with dynamic libraries on NetBSD
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 19:00:04 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69081
Re: BIND 9.21.21: Problem with dynamic libraries on NetBSD
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:47:15 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #69080
BIND 9.21.21: Problem with dynamic libraries on NetBSD
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 11:17:59 +0200
Lars-Johan Liman <[email protected]> • #69079
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:18:04 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69078
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 16:47:57 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #69077
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:21:40 +0000
"Richard T.A. Neal" <[email protected]> • #69076
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:51:13 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #69075
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:42:56 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #69074
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:34:41 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #69073
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:11:13 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #69072
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:57:27 +0000
"Richard T.A. Neal" <[email protected]> • #69071
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:04:43 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #69070
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:52:54 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #69069
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:45:44 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #69068
Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:37:42 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #69067
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 12:38:42 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #69066
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:54:51 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69065
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 08 Apr 2026 13:07:38 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #69064
BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:58:19 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #69063
Re: Persistance of SKR file in offline KSK configuration
Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:12:12 +0200
Matthijs Mekking <[email protected]> • #69062
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 12:11:13 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #69061
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 12:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Fred Morris <[email protected]> • #69060
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.