gmane.network.dns.bind9.user archive

397 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 07:24:04 +0200
Carlos Horowicz via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21900
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 06:00:58 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21899
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Fri, 29 May 2026 10:13:23 +1000
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #21898
Re: BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Thu, 28 May 2026 16:18:26 -0400
Darren Ankney <[email protected]> • #21897
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 07:40:13 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #21896
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 10:30:25 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21895
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 09:24:41 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21894
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 09:42:48 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #21893
BIND 9.21.22 and logging of REFUSED and FORMERR
Thu, 28 May 2026 09:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #21892
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 07:58:22 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21891
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 08:43:46 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #21890
Re: named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 07:08:07 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21889
named.rfc1912.zones + named.root.key
Thu, 28 May 2026 08:00:21 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #21888
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 19:26:12 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21887
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 19:02:21 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21886
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 12:52:47 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #21885
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 16:16:47 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21884
Re: Compiling BIND 9.21.22+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 14:58:51 +0000
Carsten Strotmann via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21883
Compiling BIND 9.22.21+ on NetBSD 10.x
Wed, 20 May 2026 14:35:22 +0000
Carsten Strotmann via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21882
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Tue, 19 May 2026 14:47:18 +0200
Petr Menšík via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21881
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Thu, 7 May 2026 09:01:13 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #21880
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Thu, 7 May 2026 08:56:43 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #21879
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:09:13 +0100
Greg <[email protected]> • #21878
Re: new Bind server and bind rpm package
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:57:25 +0200
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #21877
new Bind server and bind rpm package
Wed, 6 May 2026 10:48:08 +0200
Renzo Marengo <[email protected]> • #21876
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Wed, 6 May 2026 08:31:17 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21875
Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 23:26:28 -0700
Mark Strohm <[email protected]> • #21874
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Wed, 6 May 2026 05:55:14 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21873
Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 17:41:14 -0700
Mark Strohm <[email protected]> • #21872
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 18:36:57 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21871
Re: Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 17:26:02 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21870
Macos: cannot do recursive NS lookups
Tue, 5 May 2026 08:56:12 -0700
Mark Strohm <[email protected]> • #21869
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 17:14:38 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21868
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 16:07:37 +0100
Greg <[email protected]> • #21867
RE: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 15:04:01 +0000
[email protected] • #21866
Re: Request for clarification on the functionality of BIND 9.18.37 /9.20.22
Tue, 5 May 2026 06:56:09 -0700
Crist Clark <[email protected]> • #21865
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 15:27:35 +0200
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #21864
Request for clarification on the functionality of BIND 9.18.37 /9.20.22
Tue, 05 May 2026 18:38:25 +0530
Kishore Karthikeyan A T via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21863
Re: IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 13:04:03 +0100
Greg <[email protected]> • #21862
IPv6 NS address fetch failures in BIND despite IPv4-only network
Tue, 5 May 2026 11:41:22 +0000
[email protected] • #21861
RE: BIND 9.21.20: DNS Error Reporting Logging and Resolver IP Addresses
Tue, 5 May 2026 07:36:21 -0400
Scott Hollenbeck via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21860
Re: BIND 9.21.20: DNS Error Reporting Logging and Resolver IP Addresses
Tue, 5 May 2026 10:58:14 +0200
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21859
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Tue, 5 May 2026 10:09:52 +0300
Ibrahim Almahfooz <[email protected]> • #21858
Re: DoT answers only for loopback interface
Tue, 5 May 2026 08:57:33 +0200
poubeline--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21857
Re: DoT answers only for loopback interface
Mon, 4 May 2026 21:01:22 +0200
Sten Carlsen via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21856
Re: DoT answers only for loopback interface
Mon, 4 May 2026 17:12:22 +0200
poubeline--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21855
DoT answers only for loopback interface
Mon, 4 May 2026 16:28:24 +0200
poubeline--- via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21854
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 15:50:34 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #21853
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 20:42:32 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21852
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 15:38:53 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #21851
Re: BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 20:28:11 +0100
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21850
BIND9 9.21.21 DoT Forwarding Fails with Quad9 (9.9.9.9 etc) ; Cloudflare/Google/own unbound work OK
Sun, 3 May 2026 14:51:58 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #21849
Re: DoT forwarder: controlling timeout before fallback to recursion ?
Sun, 3 May 2026 14:05:47 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #21848
Re: DoT forwarder: controlling timeout before fallback to recursion ?
Sun, 03 May 2026 13:37:32 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #21847
DoT forwarder: controlling timeout before fallback to recursion ?
Sun, 3 May 2026 09:48:55 -0400
pgnd <[email protected]> • #21846
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 12:06:17 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21845
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 12:58:16 +0300
Ibrahim Almahfooz <[email protected]> • #21844
Re: BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 09:54:19 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21843
BIND 9.18.48 Crash upon Serve Stale Enabling, with general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure) and Recursion Loop Detected
Sun, 3 May 2026 10:39:21 +0300
Ibrahim Almahfooz <[email protected]> • #21842
BIND 9.21.20: DNS Error Reporting Logging and Resolver IP Addresses
Sat, 2 May 2026 11:22:07 -0400
Scott Hollenbeck via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21841
Re: BIND 9.21.21: Problem with dynamic libraries on NetBSD
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 19:00:04 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21840
Re: BIND 9.21.21: Problem with dynamic libraries on NetBSD
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:47:15 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #21839
BIND 9.21.21: Problem with dynamic libraries on NetBSD
Sun, 19 Apr 2026 11:17:59 +0200
Lars-Johan Liman <[email protected]> • #21838
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:18:04 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21837
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 16:47:57 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #21836
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:21:40 +0000
"Richard T.A. Neal" <[email protected]> • #21835
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:51:13 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21834
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:42:56 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21833
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:34:41 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21832
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:11:13 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #21831
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:57:27 +0000
"Richard T.A. Neal" <[email protected]> • #21830
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:04:43 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21829
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:52:54 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #21828
Re: Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:45:44 +0200
Peter Davies <[email protected]> • #21827
Bind 9.20 inline signing - not signing whole file, only dynamic updated entries.
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:37:42 +0200
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21826
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 12:38:42 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #21825
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:54:51 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21824
Re: BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 08 Apr 2026 13:07:38 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #21823
BIND 9.21+/9.22: parent-centric delegations and no TTL-based cleaning
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:58:19 +0200
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21822
Re: Persistance of SKR file in offline KSK configuration
Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:12:12 +0200
Matthijs Mekking <[email protected]> • #21821
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 12:11:13 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #21820
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 12:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Fred Morris <[email protected]> • #21819
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 19:29:45 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #21818
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 12:06:47 -0500
Grant Taylor via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21817
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 09:03:36 +1200
Nick Tait via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21816
Re: Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sat, 4 Apr 2026 17:26:03 +0000
Mike <[email protected]> • #21815
Persistance of SKR file in offline KSK configuration
Sat, 04 Apr 2026 16:43:06 +0000
Jakub Suchý <[email protected]> • #21814
Is there a way to avoid miscreants?
Sat, 4 Apr 2026 13:50:24 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #21813
NIST updates its DNS security guidance for the first time in over a decade
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 06:18:37 +0000
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21812
Re:Re: BIND 9.20.20 Bug Report: stale-answer-client-timeout 0 causes cache not to refresh when A record changes to CNAME
Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:36:40 +0800 (CST)
fitwateys <[email protected]> • #21811
Re: BIND 9.20.20 Bug Report: stale-answer-client-timeout 0 causes cache not to refresh when A record changes to CNAME
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:42:37 +0100
ondrej email account <[email protected]> • #21810
Re: Query about new bind install and it's chatty log
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 02:06:53 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt <[email protected]> • #21809
Re:Re: BIND 9.20.20 Bug Report: stale-answer-client-timeout 0 causes cache not to refresh when A record changes to CNAME
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:36:56 +0800 (CST)
fitwateys <[email protected]> • #21808
Re: BIND 9.20.20 Bug Report: stale-answer-client-timeout 0 causes cache not to refresh when A record changes to CNAME
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:33:49 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21807
BIND 9.20.20 Bug Report: stale-answer-client-timeout 0 causes cache not to refresh when A record changes to CNAME
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:47:51 +0800 (CST)
fitwateys <[email protected]> • #21806
Re: Query about new bind install and it's chatty log
Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:49:53 +1300
Nick Tait via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21805
Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9.21/9.22+
Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:20:34 +0800
[email protected] • #21804
Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9.21/9.22+
Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:36:10 -0500
Richard Laager via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21803
Re: [BIND-users] DNSSEC Key Management: Using dns sec-policy with Externally Generated Keys — KASP Auto-Ret iring Newly Copied Keys
Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:46:42 +0100
Matthijs Mekking <[email protected]> • #21802
Re: [BIND-users] DNSSEC Key Management: Using dns sec-policy with Externally Generated Keys — KASP Auto-Ret iring Newly Copied Keys
Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:59:55 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21801
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.