gmane.network.dns.bind9.user archive

399 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:30:33 -0600
Richard Laager via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21700
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:23:23 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21699
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:04:39 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #21698
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:02:18 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21697
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:58:35 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21696
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:24:21 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21695
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 20:24:09 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #21694
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:07:24 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21693
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 12:01:57 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21692
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:02:41 +0100
Marco Moock <[email protected]> • #21691
Re: Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:51:46 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21690
Named issues with T-Mobile 5G for Business
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:29:07 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21689
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 14:21:30 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #21688
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:58:53 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21687
Can’t register to Gitlab
Sat, 3 Jan 2026 23:31:32 +0100
Giulio Benetti <[email protected]> • #21686
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Sat, 3 Jan 2026 09:17:48 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21685
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:44:32 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #21684
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:37:42 +0100
Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> • #21683
account "schildbach" at ISC GitLab blocked
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 18:43:40 +0100
Andreas Schildbach via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21682
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 19:11:06 -0800
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #21681
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 02:14:15 +0100
Benny Pedersen via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21680
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:48:17 +0000
* Neustradamus * <[email protected]> • #21679
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 13:37:50 -0800
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #21678
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 20:48:31 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #21677
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Sun, 21 Dec 2025 20:22:56 +0100
tale via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21676
Re: resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Fri, 19 Dec 2025 18:33:01 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #21675
resolver change between 9.20.16 and 9.20.17
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:55:02 +0100
"Andreas S. Kerber via bind-users" <[email protected]> • #21674
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:53:47 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21673
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Sun, 14 Dec 2025 13:37:13 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21672
Re: How to remove all signatures from zonefile (inline signing trouble after upgrading to 9.20)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 19:25:20 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21671
Re: How to remove all signatures from zonefile (inline signing trouble after upgrading to 9.20)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 09:30:48 -0800
Crist Clark <[email protected]> • #21670
How to remove all signatures from zonefile (inline signing trouble after upgrading to 9.20)
Fri, 12 Dec 2025 16:56:05 +0100
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21669
Re: IPv6 logging noise
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:05:58 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21668
Re: IPv6 logging noise
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:54:06 -0600
Doug Freed <[email protected]> • #21667
Re: IPv6 logging noise
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:48:41 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21666
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:33:44 +0000
Carsten Strotmann via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21665
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:01:04 +0100
Michał Kępień <[email protected]> • #21664
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 03:34:33 -0500
Veaceslav Revutchi <[email protected]> • #21663
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:02:16 +0100
Anand Buddhdev <[email protected]> • #21662
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Thu, 11 Dec 2025 07:28:39 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21661
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:35:58 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21660
Re: Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:36:01 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #21659
Bind 9.20.15 denying transfer to secondaries?
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:13:29 +0100
Benoît Panizzon <[email protected]> • #21658
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:28:51 -0500
Darren Ankney <[email protected]> • #21657
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 16:45:11 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21656
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 15:39:19 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> • #21655
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 15:53:12 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #21654
Re: validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Tue, 9 Dec 2025 08:41:48 +0700
Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> • #21653
validating the fix for CVE-2025-40778
Mon, 8 Dec 2025 18:24:05 -0500
Veaceslav Revutchi <[email protected]> • #21652
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Sat, 6 Dec 2025 23:02:28 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21651
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:45:59 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #21650
Re: An experimental RPZ plugin (was Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?)
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:57:40 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21649
An experimental RPZ plugin (was Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?)
Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:47:01 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #21648
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:09:49 +0100
"Peter 'PMc' Much" <[email protected]> • #21647
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:13:15 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #21646
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:04:41 +0100
"Peter 'PMc' Much" <[email protected]> • #21645
Re: twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:50:12 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #21644
twice as many RRs in 9.20?
Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:43:57 +0100
"Peter 'PMc' Much" <[email protected]> • #21643
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 22:04:17 -0500
tale via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21642
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:31:25 -0500
Ben Scott <[email protected]> • #21641
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:18:16 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21640
Re: bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 02:25:29 -0800
Dan Mahoney <[email protected]> • #21639
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:26:08 +0100
Petr Špaček <[email protected]> • #21638
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:37:08 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21637
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 07:52:49 +0100
Colin Vidal <[email protected]> • #21636
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:40:43 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21635
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:12:52 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #21634
bind-users mailing list desn't manage DMARC
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:24:14 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #21633
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:16:43 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21632
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 00:11:11 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #21631
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:00:14 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21630
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:58:11 +1100
Mark Andrews <[email protected]> • #21629
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:55:41 -0500
Darren Ankney <[email protected]> • #21628
Re: Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:54:24 +0000
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21627
Integrating ISC-DHCP with/ Bind (and eventually Kea)
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:50:25 -0700
Philip Prindeville via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21626
Dynamic zone with fixed include of DKIM entries on server
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 06:00:17 +0200
Matthias Fechner <[email protected]> • #21625
Re: Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Sat, 29 Nov 2025 05:57:12 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21624
Using a DLZ as RPZ?
Sat, 29 Nov 2025 04:33:48 +0100
Jesus Cea <[email protected]> • #21623
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 14:33:48 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21622
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 19:39:31 +0000
Greg Choules via bind-users <[email protected]> • #21621
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 01:15:58 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21620
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 18:08:39 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21619
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 00:17:13 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21618
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 00:15:48 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21617
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 00:14:54 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21616
RE: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:47:57 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #21615
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:38:03 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21614
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 22:40:42 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21613
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:34:48 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21612
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 21:52:26 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21611
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 21:43:03 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21610
RE: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:33:58 +0000
Marc <[email protected]> • #21609
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:25:08 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21608
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:22:06 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21607
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 20:00:08 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21606
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:46:40 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21605
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 19:40:14 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21604
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:32:13 +0100
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> • #21603
Re: About Bind Plugin development
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 18:50:37 +0800
Chunhui Ouyang <[email protected]> • #21602
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.