gmane.network.e-smith.devel archive

380 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: Thanks for your participation in devinfo... and on to the new era...
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:17:00 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3548
Thanks for your participation in devinfo... and on to the new era...
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:04:14 -0500
[email protected] • #3547
Cutover to [email protected]
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:24:44 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3546
Sun open sources Cobalt Qube/Raq software
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:19:30 -0400
"David Drysdale" <[email protected]> • #3545
RE: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:13:13 -0400
"David Drysdale" <[email protected]> • #3544
Re: SME6.0 - CGI - QMAIL Port Change
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:42:25 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3543
SME6.0 - CGI - QMAIL Port Change
Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:07:12 +0100
gbl - smedevelopment <[email protected]> • #3542
So long and thanks..........
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:47:43 +0000
Richard Bruce <[email protected]> • #3541
Re: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:28:22 -0800
[email protected] • #3540
Re: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:28:16 -0800
[email protected] • #3539
Re: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:28:12 -0800
[email protected] • #3538
Re: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:01:03 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3537
Re: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:33:53 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3536
Re: SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:08:49 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3535
SME 6 dbase initialization mechanism
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:22:37 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3534
Re: install problem (kickstart config missing)
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:24:17 -0600
Jim Craner <[email protected]> • #3533
install problem (kickstart config missing)
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:30:08 -0500 (EST)
Justin Zygmont <[email protected]> • #3532
Re: clarification
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:34:21 -0500
[email protected] • #3531
clarification
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:20:17 +0000 (GMT)
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3530
RE: Powerswitch for SME
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:38:31 +0100
"Michiel Blotwijk" <[email protected]> • #3529
Re: Powerswitch for SME
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:53:57 -0000
"Bruce Richardson" <[email protected]> • #3528
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:32:54 -0800
Mike Sensney <[email protected]> • #3527
Re: sme 6.0
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:39:43 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3526
sme 6.0
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 21:16:23 -0500 (EST)
Justin Zygmont <[email protected]> • #3525
RE: Powerswitch for SME
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:48:51 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3524
Powerswitch for SME
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:42:10 +0100
"Michiel Blotwijk" <[email protected]> • #3523
Re: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:37:01 +0000
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3522
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:05:36 -0800
Mike Sensney <[email protected]> • #3521
Re: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:44:20 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3520
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:45:50 -0500
[email protected] • #3519
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:41:12 -0500
[email protected] • #3518
Re: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:34:39 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3517
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:31:11 -0500
[email protected] • #3516
RE: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:07:27 +0100
"Jaap van Hemert" <[email protected]> • #3515
Re: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:05:33 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3514
Re: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:02:33 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3513
Re: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:00:53 +1100
Rasjid Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3512
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:56:58 -0500
[email protected] • #3511
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:42:08 -0500
[email protected] • #3510
RE: Is this alowed?
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:29:43 +0100
"Jaap van Hemert" <[email protected]> • #3509
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:32:57 -0800
Mike Sensney <[email protected]> • #3508
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:51:06 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3507
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:48:03 -0500
[email protected] • #3506
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:00:02 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3505
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:18:40 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3504
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:08:39 +0000 (GMT)
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3503
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:50:43 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3502
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:47:27 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3501
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:26:22 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3500
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:42:40 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3499
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:35:23 -0500
Brian Luerssen <[email protected]> • #3498
Re: Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:28:04 -0500
[email protected] • #3497
Is this alowed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:04:00 +0100
"Jaap van Hemert" <[email protected]> • #3496
RE: New list subscription remeinder
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:53:17 +0930
"Rob Adams" <[email protected]> • #3495
RE: New list subscription remeinder
Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:48:05 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3494
Re: New list subscription remeinder
Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:43:39 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3493
RE: New list subscription remeinder
Thu, 25 Dec 2003 11:53:06 +0930
"Rob Adams" <[email protected]> • #3492
New list subscription remeinder
Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:25:59 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3491
RE: Thank you Mitel!
Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:30:46 +0930
"Rob Adams" <[email protected]> • #3490
RE: Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyonegot ideas?
Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:21:34 +1100
David Jacobs <[email protected]> • #3489
RE: Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyonegot ideas?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:13:11 -0700
"Craig Jensen" <[email protected]> • #3488
Re: Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyonegot ideas?
Wed, 24 Dec 2003 01:05:51 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3487
Re: Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyonegot ideas?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:00:14 -0600
"John Bennett" <[email protected]> • #3486
Re: Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyone got ideas?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:44:41 -0000
Ron Moxham <[email protected]> • #3485
Re: Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyone got ideas?
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:48:01 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3484
Tape backup issue with DDS-4 unit, has anyone got ideas?
Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:28:23 +1100
David Jacobs <[email protected]> • #3483
Re: Error compiline e-smith-boot-image-1.6.3-01
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:07:32 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3482
Re: Error compiline e-smith-boot-image-1.6.3-01
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:00:44 -0500
Tony Clayton <[email protected]> • #3481
Re: Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:33:18 -0500 (EST)
"Peter Samuel" <[email protected]> • #3480
Re: Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:52:08 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3479
Re: Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:30:09 -0500
"David Trask" <[email protected]> • #3478
Error compiline e-smith-boot-image-1.6.3-01
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:26:14 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3477
Re: Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:35:51 +1100
Rasjid Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3476
AW: Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:21:57 +0100
"admin" <[email protected]> • #3475
RE: Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:49:39 +0100
"Bearne, Paul" <[email protected]> • #3474
Thank you Mitel!
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:56:48 -0500
Wayne Bollinger <[email protected]> • #3473
RE: SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:41:45 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3472
Re: SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:39:15 -0500
Gordon Rowell <[email protected]> • #3471
White Box Linux
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:57:55 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3470
Re: OpenH323 and SME
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:18:24 +1100
Brad Hards <[email protected]> • #3469
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:44:50 -0500
[email protected] • #3468
Re: reply-to-all
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:44:14 -0500 (EST)
"Peter Samuel" <[email protected]> • #3467
RE: SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:19:28 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3466
Re: SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:44:33 -0500
Rich Lafferty <[email protected]> • #3465
SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:38:09 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3464
Re: reply-to-all (was Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:10:00 -0700
"Shad L. Lords" <[email protected]> • #3463
RE: Reply to List option
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:15:30 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3462
RE: Reply to List option
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:03:25 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3461
RE: Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:46:09 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3460
Re: reply-to-all (was Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:35:40 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3459
RE: Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:12:15 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3458
RE: Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devi nfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:59:34 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3457
Re: Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:43:37 -0000
"Nick Ramsay" <[email protected]> • #3456
reply-to-all (was Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:13:31 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3455
RE: Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devi nfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:33:17 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3454
Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 01:27:20 +1100
Rasjid Wilcox <[email protected]> • #3453
Re: GPL
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:09:27 -0500
[email protected] • #3452
Re: Source packages
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:14:00 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3451
RE: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:08:27 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3450
Re: GPL
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:05:16 +0000
Bruce Richardson <[email protected]> • #3449
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.