gmane.network.librsync.devel archive

81 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 1). Latest articles →

Re: reactivating librsync: new github hosting and lists
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:50:49 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #82
Re: reactivating librsync: new github hosting and lists
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 06:49:25 -0700
Milind Gupta <[email protected]> • #81
reactivating librsync: new github hosting and lists
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:44:59 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #80
Re: librsync forks
Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:21:02 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #79
Re: librsync forks
Thu, 16 May 2013 20:42:04 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #78
Re: librsync forks
Thu, 16 May 2013 02:10:10 -0700
Paul Oppenheim <[email protected]> • #77
Re: librsync forks
Thu, 16 May 2013 18:48:49 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #76
librsync forks
Thu, 16 May 2013 01:18:03 -0700
Paul Oppenheim <[email protected]> • #75
Re: [librsync-commits] [ librsync-Patches-3571263 ] performance issue resolution for large files
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:34:58 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #74
Librsync unable to run on mac
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:50:41 +0530
karamjeet singh <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Newbie on lib rsync, Hellp, anyone home?
Sat, 09 May 2009 16:52:53 +0800
"Daniel.Li" <[email protected]> • #72
Re: Newbie on lib rsync, Hellp, anyone home?
Fri, 08 May 2009 13:17:57 +0100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #71
Re: Newbie on lib rsync, Hellp, anyone home?
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:17:47 +0800
"Daniel.Li" <[email protected]> • #70
Newbie on lib rsync, Hellp, anyone home?
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:15:59 +0800
"Daniel.Li" <[email protected]> • #69
any chance to revive this ..
Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:40:51 +0100
Joachim Hamm <[email protected]> • #68
Re: librsync
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:38:04 +0100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #67
using librsync 0.9.7 library with Managed VC++ .Net
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:57:20 +0530
"Harshal" <[email protected]> • #66
Release?
Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:33:44 -0700
"Corey Puffalt" <[email protected]> • #65
Re: 0.9.8 release for librsync?
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:30:51 +0100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #63
Re: Need librsync-devel source
Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:08:31 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #62
Need librsync-devel source
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:01:31 -0700
Ranga Nathan <[email protected]> • #61
Re: [ 1439412 ] Fix Bug Request ID: 1110812 - no progress error; large files
Fri, 5 May 2006 19:20:40 +0200
"roland" <[email protected]> • #60
Re: [Fwd: bug 1110812 - 4Gigbug.patch does not work in Windows]
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:55:00 -0500
Ben Escoto <[email protected]> • #59
Re: [Fwd: bug 1110812 - 4Gigbug.patch does not work in Windows]
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:59:15 +0000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #58
Re: [Fwd: bug 1110812 - 4Gigbug.patch does not work in Windows]
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:18:17 +0530
Sekar Vembu <[email protected]> • #57
Re: [Fwd: bug 1110812 - 4Gigbug.patch does not work in Windows]
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:43:05 +0000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #56
[Fwd: bug 1110812 - 4Gigbug.patch does not work in Windows]
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:18:56 +0530
Sekar Vembu <[email protected]> • #55
bug 1110812 - 4Gigbug.patch does not work in Windows
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:55:09 +0530
Sekar Vembu <[email protected]> • #54
Re: [librsync-users] MD4 second-preimage attack
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:30:52 +0200
[email protected] • #53
Re: [librsync-users] MD4 second-preimage attack
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:29:57 +0000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #52
'internal error: job made no progress' on 25G file - Bug Request ID: 1110812
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:32:36 +0800
"Don Malcolm" <[email protected]> • #51
Re: Re: librsync 4GB bug
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:13:34 +0000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #50
Re: librsync 4GB bug
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:07:02 +0000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #49
Re: [librsync-devel] Re: No actions delta file.
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:51:24 +0200
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó <[email protected]> • #48
Re: [librsync-users] No actions delta file.
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:45:45 +0200
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó <[email protected]> • #47
Re: [librsync-users] No actions delta file.
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:19:13 +0100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #46
No actions delta file.
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:35:19 +0200
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó <[email protected]> • #45
No actions delta file.
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:20:20 +0200
Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó <[email protected]> • #44
sco openserver won't compile
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:18:39 -0600
matthew schoolmaster <[email protected]> • #43
Re: Compiling under MSVC ("inline" problems)
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:15:20 +1100
"Donovan Baarda" <[email protected]> • #42
Re: Compiling under MSVC ("inline" problems)
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:05:02 +0100
"Andreas Wurf" <[email protected]> • #41
Compiling under MSVC ("inline" problems)
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:50:05 +0100
"Andreas Wurf" <[email protected]> • #40
Re: Compile error: librsync on Windows with Win2003.Net Compiler
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:21:06 +1100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #39
librsync 0.9.7
Sun, 07 Nov 2004 01:23:25 +0200
[email protected] • #38
compiling a DLL
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:59:56 -0500
Jan Fetyko <[email protected]> • #37
Re: librsync web page in CVS?
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:18:55 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #36
librsync web page in CVS?
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:04:04 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #35
Re: "inline"?
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:53:59 +1000
"Donovan Baarda" <[email protected]> • #34
Re: [librsync-commits] librsync emit.c,1.46,1.47
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:12:37 +1000
[email protected] (Donovan Baarda) • #33
"inline"?
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:48:59 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #32
Re: Re: [librsync-commits] librsync configure.ac,1.10,1.11
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:13:04 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #31
Re: [librsync-commits] librsync configure.ac,1.10,1.11
Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:20:13 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #30
Re: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:32:57 -0400
Alec Berryman <[email protected]> • #29
Re: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:38:32 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #28
Re: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:57:15 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #27
Re: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:55:34 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #26
Re: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:26:11 -0400
Simon Law <[email protected]> • #25
Re: Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:59:15 +1000
"Donovan Baarda" <[email protected]> • #24
Large file (>2GB) support in librsync
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:39:01 -0400
Alec Berryman <[email protected]> • #23
Re: librsync: ERROR: (rs_file_copy_cb) seek failed: Invalid argument
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:59:48 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #22
Re: librsync: ERROR: (rs_file_copy_cb) seek failed: Invalid argument
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 08:46:29 -0700
Ben Escoto <[email protected]> • #21
Re: [librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:38:23 +1000
"Donovan Baarda" <[email protected]> • #20
Re: [librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:55:05 -0700
Wayne Davison <[email protected]> • #19
Re: [librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:37:47 +0300
Eran Tromer <[email protected]> • #18
Re: [librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:16:24 +1000
"Donovan Baarda" <[email protected]> • #17
Re: [librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:48:15 +0300
Eran Tromer <[email protected]> • #16
Re: [librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:50:48 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #15
Re: rs_mdfour functions and librsync >= 0.9.6
Wed, 07 Apr 2004 23:11:03 -0400
"Shirish H. Phatak" <[email protected]> • #14
callback-based interface
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:55:55 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #13
Re: rs_mdfour functions and librsync >= 0.9.6
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:43:12 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #12
Re: librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:36:53 +1000
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #11
Re: rs_mdfour functions and librsync >= 0.9.6
Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:33:28 -0400
Shirish Hemant Phatak <[email protected]> • #10
Re: rs_mdfour functions and librsync >= 0.9.6
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:13:05 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #9
rs_mdfour functions and librsync >= 0.9.6
Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:28:01 -0400
Shirish Hemant Phatak <[email protected]> • #8
rs_mdfour functions and librsync >= 0.9.6
Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:26:20 -0400
Shirish Hemant Phatak <[email protected]> • #7
librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:13:45 +1000
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #6
Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:04:54 +0200
Eran Tromer <[email protected]> • #5
Re: MD4 checksum_seed
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:46:31 +1100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #4
Re: [rfc] hide rs_buffers_t from public interface
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:15:43 +1100
Donovan Baarda <[email protected]> • #3
Re: [rfc] hide rs_buffers_t from public interface
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:54:46 +1100
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #2
Re: [rfc] hide rs_buffers_t from public interface
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:46:51 +1100
Martin Pool <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.