gmane.network.xinetd archive

166 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: 1
Tue, 17 May 2011 12:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #166
2.3.13 is out
Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #165
mailing list
Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:24:03 -0800
Rob Braun <[email protected]> • #164
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Wed, 07 Jan 2004 21:43:23 +0100
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #163
Re: Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:21:42 -0700 (MST)
"John Minnihan" <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #161
Re: Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #160
Re: Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:21:30 -0700 (MST)
"John Minnihan" <[email protected]> • #159
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:01:26 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #158
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:15:56 +0100
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #157
Re: Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:26:18 -0700 (MST)
"John Minnihan" <[email protected]> • #156
Re: Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #155
Xinetd and file descriptor limits?
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:03:31 -0700 (MST)
"John Minnihan" <[email protected]> • #154
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:27:37 -0500
David Cook <[email protected]> • #153
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #152
xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:50:38 -0500
David Cook <[email protected]> • #151
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 13:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #150
Re: xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #149
xinetd bug or new DoS attack?
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 13:02:23 -0500
David Cook <[email protected]> • #148
Re: only_from
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:08:32 +0100
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #147
Re: only_from
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:08:48 +0100
Jörn Vehoff <[email protected]> • #146
Re: only_from
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:14:43 -0500 (EST)
"Streiner, Justin" <[email protected]> • #145
Re: only_from
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 04:25:35 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #144
only_from
Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:23:56 +0100
Jörn Vehoff <[email protected]> • #143
Re: crash on reconfig
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:48:06 +0300
Dmitry Perfilyev <[email protected]> • #142
Re: crash on reconfig
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 04:28:49 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #141
Re: crash on reconfig
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:54:14 +0300
Dmitry Perfilyev <[email protected]> • #140
Re: crash on reconfig
Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:28:20 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #139
Re: crash on reconfig
Thu, 25 Dec 2003 11:13:36 +0300
Dmitry Perfilyev <[email protected]> • #138
Re: crash on reconfig
Wed, 24 Dec 2003 07:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #137
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:25:51 +0900
<[email protected]> • #136
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #135
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:07:47 +0900
<[email protected]> • #134
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:10:47 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #133
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:46:00 +0900
<[email protected]> • #132
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 04:57:58 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #131
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:08:22 +0900
<[email protected]> • #130
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #129
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:33:43 +0900
<[email protected]> • #128
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #127
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:25:34 +0900
<[email protected]> • #126
Re: Re: Solaris 9 Compile Problems
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:46:38 -0500 (EST)
"Brian E. Seppanen" <[email protected]> • #125
Re: Re: Solaris 9 Compile Problems
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:32:20 +0100
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #124
Re: Re: Solaris 9 Compile Problems
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:31:15 +0100
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #123
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #122
Re: Re: Solaris 9 Compile Problems
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:17:07 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #121
Re: Solaris 9 Compile Problems
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:40:58 -0500 (EST)
"Brian E. Seppanen" <[email protected]> • #120
Solaris 9 Compile Problems
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:12:26 -0500 (EST)
"Brian E. Seppanen" <[email protected]> • #119
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:57:07 +0900
<[email protected]> • #118
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 04:56:16 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #117
RE: present but cannot be compiled
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:26:36 +0900
<[email protected]> • #116
Re: present but cannot be compiled
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:10:13 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #115
present but cannot be compiled
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:16:09 +0900
<[email protected]> • #114
Re: Re: UUCP configuration for xinetd on RedHat
Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #113
Re: UUCP configuration for xinetd on RedHat
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:08:24 -0400
Chris Platteel <[email protected]> • #112
Re: UUCP configuration for xinetd on RedHat
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:08:07 -0400
Chris Platteel <[email protected]> • #111
Re: Newbie trying to support a system
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:58:46 -0400
Jay Fenlason <[email protected]> • #110
Re: Newbie trying to support a system
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 02:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #109
Newbie trying to support a system
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 02:08:04 -0400
"Keith Boyle" <[email protected]> • #108
cvs version runs again
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #107
Re: crash on reconfig
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:46:22 +0400
Dmitry Perfilyev <[email protected]> • #106
Re: crash on reconfig
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:46:24 +0400
Dmitry Perfilyev <[email protected]> • #105
Re: crash on reconfig
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 07:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #104
crash on reconfig
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:25:51 +0400
Dmitry Perfilyev <[email protected]> • #103
RE: Any way to do this with xinetd?
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:10:08 -0500
"Leland Lucius" <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Any way to do this with xinetd?
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #101
Any way to do this with xinetd?
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:45:20 -0500
"Leland Lucius" <[email protected]> • #100
Re: Forwarding GRE Protocol to another machine
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #99
Forwarding GRE Protocol to another machine
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:23:43 +0000
"Kevin Droz" <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Xinetd - Forward GRE Protocol to another machine
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #97
Xinetd - Forward GRE Protocol to another machine
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:30:42 +0000
"Kevin Droz" <[email protected]> • #96
Re: ssh to work with redhat 9
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #95
Re: ssh to work with redhat 9
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:00:49 -0400
Jay Fenlason <[email protected]> • #94
ssh to work with redhat 9
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Jonathan Chen <[email protected]> • #93
RE: only_from and /etc/networks?
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:24:21 -0500
"Leland Lucius" <[email protected]> • #92
Re: only_from and /etc/networks?
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 06:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #91
only_from and /etc/networks?
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:21:48 -0500
"Leland Lucius" <[email protected]> • #90
Re: support for local servers on pf_unix sockets?
Thu, 4 Sep 2003 14:08:44 -0700
Rob Braun <[email protected]> • #89
support for local servers on pf_unix sockets?
Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:29:46 -0700
"Nat Brown" <[email protected]> • #88
Re: Trivial patch to xinetd-2.3.12 to fix Red Hat Bugzilla #103009
Wed, 3 Sep 2003 06:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #87
Trivial patch to xinetd-2.3.12 to fix Red Hat Bugzilla #103009
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:23:19 -0400
Jay Fenlason <[email protected]> • #86
Re: How to enable rsh server services
Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:42:04 +0200
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #85
How to enable rsh server services
Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:55:32 +0700
"Wannachai Wannasawade" <[email protected]> • #84
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #83
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Marco Di Benedetto <[email protected]> • #82
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #81
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #80
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Marco Di Benedetto <[email protected]> • #79
Re: starting a ssh tunnel with xinetd
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 06:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #78
starting a ssh tunnel with xinetd
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:25:37 +0200
"Paul Herbosch" <[email protected]> • #77
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #76
Re: Running xinetd 2.3.12
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 02:22:45 +0200
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #75
Running xinetd 2.3.12
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Marco Di Benedetto <[email protected]> • #74
Re: Xinetd listening on weird ports
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:07:18 +0200
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Xinetd listening on weird ports
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #72
Xinetd listening on weird ports
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:12:38 -0400
"Serge Paquin" <[email protected]> • #71
Re: Normal mode of operation? - Clarifying on 2nd Try.j
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:13:27 -0500
Tony Thedford <[email protected]> • #70
Re: Normal mode of operation? - Clarifying on 2nd Try.j
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Steve G <[email protected]> • #69
Re: Normal mode of operation? - Clarifying on 2nd Try.j
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:43:19 -0500
Tony Thedford <[email protected]> • #68
Re: Normal mode of operation? - Clarifying on 2nd Try.j
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:47:15 -0700
Rob Braun <[email protected]> • #67
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.