gmane.org.osaf.design archive
371 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: Data model and Design documents of the Chandler application
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:15:04 -0800RE: Data model and Design documents of the Chandler application
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:39:55 +0530Re: Data model and Design documents of the Chandler application
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:48:35 -0800Data model and Design documents of the Chandler application
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:14:38 +0530[Chandler-dev] [Decision] List consolidation
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:49:56 -0800Re: [Update][Sum] Weird triage and sharing bugs to focus on
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:36:20 -0800Re: [Design] Re: [Proposal] List consolidation
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:25:52 -1000Re: [Proposal] List consolidation
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:59:48 -0800[Chandler-dev] [Proposal] List consolidation
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:37:09 -0800[Sum] The State of Sharing
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:44:19 -0800[Sum] The State of the Dashboard
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:15:08 -0800Re: OSAF Transitions
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:38:44 -0800Re: OSAF Transitions
Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:37:57 -0800OSAF Transitions
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:51:13 -0800Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:47:01 -1000Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:14:59 -0500Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:11:50 -0500Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:03:56 -0500Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:22:38 -0800Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:08:36 -0800Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:45:36 -0800Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:27:37 -0500Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:41:52 -0800Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:40:21 -0500Re: Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:09:53 -0800Chandler as a Managed Workspace
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 06:22:33 -0800Thunderbird / Exchange and Data flow in to Chandler
Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:26:44 -1000Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:17:49 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:27:43 -0500Cosmo List/Cal View
Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:57:58 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:02:57 -0500Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:33:48 -0500Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:01:15 -0500Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:06:36 -0500[Update][Sum] Weird triage and sharing bugs to focus on
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:37:50 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:20:07 -0500Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:27:48 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:15:49 -0500Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:26:25 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:02:05 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:15:28 -0500Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:01:40 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:17:57 -0500Re: Auto Restore of Shares streamlines reordering collections
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:58:53 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:24:26 -0800Re: Auto Restore of Shares streamlines reordering collections
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:28:44 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:19:04 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:31:41 -0500Auto Restore of Shares streamlines reordering collections
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:11:25 -0500Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:54:17 -0800Re: What's the 'pony in the product'?
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:35:52 -0500Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:54:36 -0800Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:29:00 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:11:20 -0600Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:26:41 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:25:42 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:02:53 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:15:39 -0600Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:03:17 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:00:39 -0800Re: Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:58:37 -0800What's the 'pony in the product'?
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:53:18 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:57:40 -0600Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:30:11 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:23:37 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:20:28 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:41:23 -0600Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:23:49 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:50:36 -0500Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:40:15 -0800Re: Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:48:04 -0800Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:24:41 -0800Re: Fwd: 'Weird triage and sharing bugs to focus on' Redux
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:17:28 -0800Re: Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:29:03 -0600Re: Fwd: 'Weird triage and sharing bugs to focus on' Redux
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:07:18 -0800Accidentally sharing item that was only emailed around...
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:47:18 -0800Re: Tip of the Day takes focus from Reminder dialog
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:32:47 -0800Tip of the Day takes focus from Reminder dialog
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:47:54 -0500Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:52:20 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:35:37 -0800Re: [Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:34:05 -0800My Chandler + GTD Odyssey
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:59 -0500[Proposal] Making syncing b/w Desktop and Web dead simple
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:23:47 -0800Re: 'Weird triage and sharing bugs to focus on' Redux
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:21:18 -1000Fwd: 'Weird triage and sharing bugs to focus on' Redux
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:07:21 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:28:09 -1000Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:14:30 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:36:42 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:26:36 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:19:55 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:18:52 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:09:52 -0800[Decision] Name of Triage button
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:15:52 -0800Re: Design + Usability, Useful + Usable
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:39:48 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:46:51 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:43:47 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:16:03 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:10:12 -0800Re: Cosmo 1.0 plan
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:00:02 -0800Re: creating new Hub account from the accounts dialog
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:54:47 -0500
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.