gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general archive

636 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 7). Latest articles →

RE: keyboard focus of overflow:auto/scroll element
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:06:46 -0500
"Jim Allan" <[email protected]> • #2970
Re: keyboard focus of overflow:auto/scroll element
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:21:06 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #2969
Code Responsibly
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:13:05 +0200
"Jens Meiert" <[email protected]> • #2968
RE: XForms and Adobe Forms - WAI Version 1 AA Compliant
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:06:46 -0800
"Klotz, Leigh" <[email protected]> • #2967
Re: XForms and Adobe Forms - WAI Version 1 AA Compliant
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:17:27 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #2966
Re: XForms and Adobe Forms - WAI Version 1 AA Compliant
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:40:13 +0100
"Steven Pemberton" <[email protected]> • #2965
Re: artistic expression was: What now ALT?
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:26:58 +0100
"~:'' ありがとうございました 。" <[email protected]> • #2964
RE: artistic expression was: What now ALT?
Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:59:06 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2963
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:34:50 +0200
Leif Halvard Silli <[email protected]> • #2962
Fw: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:52:35 -0400
"Tighe K. Lory" <[email protected]> • #2961
RE: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:59:36 -0700
"Andrew Kirkpatrick" <[email protected]> • #2960
Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:00:29 +0100
Joshue O Connor <[email protected]> • #2959
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:27:50 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2958
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:18:50 -0700
Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> • #2957
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:43:41 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2956
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:52:21 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #2955
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:14:16 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2954
Re: Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:04:10 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #2953
Answering the question...
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:40:27 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2952
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:48:23 -0700
"T.V Raman" <[email protected]> • #2951
RE: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:50:01 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2950
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:13:52 -0400
Doug Schepers <[email protected]> • #2949
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:51:05 -0700
Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> • #2948
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:06:42 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #2947
Being respectful in HTML WG
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:47:43 +0900
Karl Dubost <[email protected]> • #2946
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:34:41 -0700
Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> • #2945
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:28:05 -0400
Doug Schepers <[email protected]> • #2944
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:03:55 +0200 (CEST)
Tina Holmboe <[email protected]> • #2943
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:21:50 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #2942
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:04:24 -0700
Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> • #2941
RE: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:54:27 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2940
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:44:20 -0500
"Laura Carlson" <[email protected]> • #2939
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:01:33 -0700
Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> • #2938
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:55:46 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #2937
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:21:39 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #2936
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:58:40 -0400
"Cindy Sue Causey" <[email protected]> • #2935
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:23:51 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #2934
Formal Recorded Complaint
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:30:48 -0700
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2933
Second International Conference on Digital Information Management
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:35:04 +0530
"P Pichappan" <[email protected]> • #2932
ICDIM 2006
Tue, 2 May 2006 06:46:53 +0530
"P Pichappan" <[email protected]> • #2931
Re: Well-argued papers on benefits of high-level markup sought
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:45:23 +0000
"Patrick H. Lauke" <[email protected]> • #2930
PERSUASIVE 06 - extended deadline
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:29:47 +0100
"Kort, Y.A.W. de" <[email protected]> • #2929
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:23:07 +1000
Jason White <[email protected]> • #2928
RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:42:06 +0000
Richard Schwerdtfeger <[email protected]> • #2927
RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:49:03 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2926
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:53:18 -0500
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2925
RE: Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:07:38 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2924
RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:13:24 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2923
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 07:26:08 +0100 (BST)
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #2922
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:28:23 -0500
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2921
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:49:53 +0100 (BST)
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #2920
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:50:32 -0500
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2919
RE: Authors propose defaults RE: Access Element
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 09:13:08 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2918
RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:10:32 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2917
Authors propose defaults RE: Access Element
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:04:06 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #2916
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:27:38 -0600
Richard Schwerdtfeger <[email protected]> • #2915
RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 20:58:39 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2914
RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:15:47 -0400
"John Foliot - WATS.ca" <[email protected]> • #2913
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:49:30 +0100 (BST)
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #2912
what sort of precedent? [was: Re: Access Element is WRONG ...]
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:17:59 -0400
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #2911
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:17:10 -0700
Micah Dubinko <[email protected]> • #2910
Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?)
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:46:56 -0400
Al Gilman <[email protected]> • #2909
Re: italian ATAG 2.0 analysis
Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:32:02 -0600 (CST)
"Charles McCathieNevile" <[email protected]> • #2908
WS-Reliability specification submitted for OASIS Standard
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:53:53 -0500
"Garfield Green" <[email protected]> • #2907
[ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:39:02 -0500
"Johnss Cowanss" <[email protected]> • #2906
Affymetrix W3C position paper
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 02:26:20 -0500
"Famous Jefferson" <[email protected]> • #2904
XSL
Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:10:27 -0500
"Swing Dickey" <[email protected]> • #2903
Re: Validate 2 fieds!
Thu, 04 Nov 2004 01:50:58 -0500
"Oscar Omar Avila" <[email protected]> • #2902
Re: [VM] Natasha and Alan
Thu, 04 Nov 2004 01:23:14 -0500
"Goldeen Bell" <[email protected]> • #2901
FW:XHTML validator - possible bug
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:39:23 -0500
"Kaiser Ralot" <[email protected]> • #2900
Re: Representation of a secondary resource?
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:13:34 -0500
"Plato Foofas" <[email protected]> • #2899
IBM comments on WCAG 2.0, 2004 Public Draft
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:33:27 -0500
"Min Gin" <[email protected]> • #2898
IBM comments on WCAG 2.0, 2004 Public Draft
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:32:49 -0500
"Min Gin" <[email protected]> • #2897
FW:XHTML validator - possible bug
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:18:46 -0500
"Sir Gondolf" <[email protected]> • #2896
IBM comments on WCAG 2.0, July 30, 2004 Public Draft
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:20:35 -0500
"Min Gin" <[email protected]> • #2895
Language
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:21:36 -0500
"Villy Toft" <[email protected]> • #2894
Language
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:54:57 -0500
"Villy Toft" <[email protected]> • #2893
FW:XHTML validator - possible bug
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:03:38 -0500
"Ben Fortun" <[email protected]> • #2892
IRIs, URIs, and RFC 2396bis
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:29:02 -0500
"Anjels Green" <[email protected]> • #2891
re: reminder of goals/vision for site redesign project
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:05:36 +0500
Mamas Gendera <[email protected]> • #2890
re: reminder of goals/vision for site redesign project
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 03:45:33 -0500
"alex Tvin" <[email protected]> • #2889
re: reminder of goals/vision for site redesign project
Fri, 08 Oct 2004 03:45:13 -0500
"alex Tvin" <[email protected]> • #2888
ANN: formsPlayer combines XForms and the CSS3 Speech Module to produce multimodal forms
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:38:07 -0500
"Minora Dunkan" <[email protected]> • #2887
Fwd: re: reminder of goals/vision for site redesign project
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:57:56 +0500
"Charmane K. Corcoran" <[email protected]> • #2886
ANN: formsPlayer combines XForms and the CSS3 Speech Module to produce multimodal forms
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:06:51 +0100
"Mark Birbeck" <[email protected]> • #2885
Invitation: W3C DIWG Workshop on Metadata for Content Adaptation
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:49:19 +0100
"Rotan Hanrahan" <[email protected]> • #2884
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:36:47 +0000
Toby A Inkster <[email protected]> • #2883
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:07:46 -0000
"Jim Ley" <[email protected]> • #2882
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:46:11 +0200 (EET)
"Jukka K. Korpela" <[email protected]> • #2881
summary of (RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:15:31 -0500
"Jewett, Jim J" <[email protected]> • #2880
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:45:13 -0000
Brian Kelly <[email protected]> • #2879
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:29:22 -0500
"Derek Featherstone" <[email protected]> • #2878
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:17:20 -0000
Brian Kelly <[email protected]> • #2877
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:44:03 +0000
[email protected] • #2876
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:33:29 -0000
Brian Kelly <[email protected]> • #2875
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:25 +0000
[email protected] • #2874
RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:54:36 -0000
Brian Kelly <[email protected]> • #2873
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:17:45 +0100
Christian Wolfgang Hujer <[email protected]> • #2872
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:06:59 +1100
Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> • #2871
Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:34:37 -0500
"David Poehlman" <[email protected]> • #2870
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.