gmane.os.ecos.devel archive

353 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Cyg_Mutex::check_this() fails
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:35:24 +0100
René Schipp von Branitz Nielsen <[email protected]> • #2037
Re: OpenRISC port
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:56:29 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #2036
OpenRISC port
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:36:33 +0100
Piotr Skrzypek <[email protected]> • #2035
Re: Potential I2C API Enhancement
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:53:40 -0700
Michael Jones <[email protected]> • #2034
Re: Potential I2C API Enhancement
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:29:21 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #2033
Re: Potential I2C API Enhancement
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:09:32 -0700
Michael Jones <[email protected]> • #2032
Potential I2C API Enhancement
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:08:13 -0700
Michael Jones <[email protected]> • #2031
RE: eCos port/update for MIPS malta & sead3 platforms
Thu, 6 Dec 2012 07:23:32 +0000
"Chiou, Charles" <[email protected]> • #2030
Re: eCos port/update for MIPS malta & sead3 platforms
Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:58:22 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #2029
eCos port/update for MIPS malta & sead3 platforms
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:49:55 +0000
"Chiou, Charles" <[email protected]> • #2028
eCos with clang instead of gcc
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:56:00 +0100
Martin Laabs <[email protected]> • #2027
Legacy SPARC Leon2 with Ethernet
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:07:25 -0700
"Les G. Miklosy" <[email protected]> • #2026
AW: eCos 3.0 Port to Atmel AT91SAM9G45
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:47:34 +0200
"Richard Rauch" <[email protected]> • #2025
Re: eCos 3.0 Port to Atmel AT91SAM9G45
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:42:09 +0100
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #2024
eCos 3.0 Port to Atmel AT91SAM9G45
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:01:43 +0200
"Richard Rauch" <[email protected]> • #2023
Announcement eCos 3.0 Port to Xilinx Zynq 7000-EPP (Z-7020)
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:19:41 +0200
"rauch" <[email protected]> • #2022
eCos port for Atmel AT91SAM9G45 and similar processors
Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:49:21 +0200 (CEST)
Bernd Edlinger <[email protected]> • #2021
Re: Closing devices
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:48:41 -0400
Frank Pagliughi <[email protected]> • #2020
Re: Closing devices
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:33:35 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2019
Re: Closing devices
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:20:11 -0400
Frank Pagliughi <[email protected]> • #2018
Re: Closing devices
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:20:20 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2017
Re: Closing devices
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:37:37 -0400
Frank Pagliughi <[email protected]> • #2016
Re: Closing devices
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:36:10 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2015
Re: Closing devices
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:34:43 -0400
Frank Pagliughi <[email protected]> • #2014
eCos ROM startup from RedBoot
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:33:08 +0200
Pierre-Jean COUDERT <[email protected]> • #2013
Re: Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:33:35 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2012
Re: Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:36:34 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2011
Re: Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:10:13 +0100
Nick Garnett <[email protected]> • #2010
Re: Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:55:40 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2009
Re: Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:15:57 +0100
Nick Garnett <[email protected]> • #2008
Re: Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:12:15 +0200
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #2007
Handling RTS with an UART that doesn't directly drives the RTS pin
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:34:18 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2006
eCos GNU tools 4.6.3-20120315 and link time optimization
Thu, 31 May 2012 10:37:39 +0200
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #2005
Re: [OpenOCD-devel] Thread awareness with eCos problem
Mon, 28 May 2012 19:55:20 +0400
Paul Fertser <[email protected]> • #2004
Re: [OpenOCD-devel] Thread awareness with eCos problem
Mon, 28 May 2012 17:04:54 +0200
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #2003
Re: [OpenOCD-devel] Thread awareness with eCos problem
Sat, 19 May 2012 18:49:05 +0400
Paul Fertser <[email protected]> • #2002
Thread awareness with eCos problem
Sat, 19 May 2012 14:50:30 +0200
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #2001
Re: OpenOCD, Cortex-M3 and threads - any success?
Sat, 19 May 2012 14:25:50 +0200
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #2000
OpenOCD, Cortex-M3 and threads - any success?
Fri, 18 May 2012 23:15:46 +0200
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #1999
Re: CDL usage and improvements
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:25:58 +0100
Jonathan Larmour <[email protected]> • #1998
Re: CDL usage and improvements
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:10:30 +0100
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1997
Re: CDL usage and improvements
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:33:45 +0100
Jonathan Larmour <[email protected]> • #1996
Re: CDL usage and improvements
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:25:44 +0100
Jonathan Larmour <[email protected]> • #1995
CDL usage and improvements
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:13:32 +0100
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1994
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.3-20120315 [Was Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing]
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:18:04 +0200
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1993
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.3-20120315 [Was Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing]
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:57:31 +0200
Lambrecht Jürgen <[email protected]> • #1992
building of dynamic object loader fails.
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:57:04 +0100
"Ferenc Cserepkei (IJ (ETH))" <[email protected]> • #1991
eCos GNU tools 4.6.3-20120315 [Was Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing]
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:09:40 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1990
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:57:12 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1989
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:43:51 +0100
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #1988
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:50:14 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1987
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:04:25 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1986
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:50:28 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1984
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:46:42 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1983
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:15:45 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1982
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:30:38 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1981
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:42:31 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1980
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:11:55 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1979
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:16:32 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1978
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:15:01 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1977
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:39:10 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1976
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:28:18 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1975
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:50:59 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1974
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:39:13 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1973
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:12:59 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1972
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:00:36 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1971
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:58:02 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1970
Re: porting ecos to a "new" hardavre.
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:59:54 +0100
Ferenc Cserepkei <[email protected]> • #1969
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:19:39 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1968
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:56:33 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #1967
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:16:22 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1966
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:55:33 +0200
Anders Montonen <[email protected]> • #1965
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:49:43 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1964
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:56:30 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #1963
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:30:04 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #1962
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:59:54 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1961
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:47:25 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1960
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:08:09 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1959
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing
Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:37:15 +0000
John Dallaway <[email protected]> • #1958
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:49:25 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1957
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Sun, 04 Mar 2012 00:09:44 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1956
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:32:26 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1955
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:57:48 +0300 (FET)
Sergei Gavrikov <[email protected]> • #1954
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:36:16 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1953
Re: [ECOS] Re: ROMRAM .. kind of
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:23:24 +0100
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #1952
ROMRAM .. kind of
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:07:46 +0100
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #1951
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:45:14 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1950
Re: eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:59:00 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1949
jffs2 garbage collect thread
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:42:13 +0100
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #1948
cyg_fs_getinfo()
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:29:19 +0100
Stanislav Meduna <[email protected]> • #1947
Re: [ECOS] Re: Flash memory not accessible via Redboot on Kinetis TWR_K60N512_KIT
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:59:37 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #1946
Re: Wallclock - calendar option
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:50 +0100
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #1945
Wallclock - calendar option
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:09:55 +0100
qber_ <[email protected]> • #1944
eCos GNU tools 4.6.2-20120125 ready for testing [Was Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6]
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:02:34 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1943
status of OpenRISC port
Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:12:29 +0000
Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> • #1942
Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:17:52 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1941
Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:35:44 +0000
Alex Schuilenburg <[email protected]> • #1940
RE: Re: ST STM32F2X Port
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:16:04 +0100
qber_ <[email protected]> • #1939
Re: ST STM32F2X Port
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:54 +0100
Bernard Fouché <[email protected]> • #1938
Re: Gnutools: consideration for upgrade to GCC 4.6
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:59:26 +0100
Ilija Kocho <[email protected]> • #1937
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.