gmane.os.freebsd.architechture archive

1299 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 13). Latest articles →

Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:29:00 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23739
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Sat, 3 Jun 2023 09:44:24 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23738
Re: Automatic service jails - review request
Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:29:30 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> • #23737
Re: Automatic service jails - review request
Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:35:46 +0300
Gleb Popov <[email protected]> • #23736
Automatic service jails - review request
Thu, 01 Jun 2023 12:24:31 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> • #23735
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 31 May 2023 11:30:28 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23734
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 31 May 2023 07:01:49 +0200
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> • #23733
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Tue, 30 May 2023 13:57:17 -0500
Mike Karels <[email protected]> • #23732
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Tue, 30 May 2023 10:55:40 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23731
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Tue, 30 May 2023 17:25:17 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23730
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Tue, 30 May 2023 16:36:58 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23729
D40260: change cron to MIT license
Tue, 30 May 2023 08:47:44 -0500
Eric van Gyzen <[email protected]> • #23728
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Mon, 29 May 2023 13:53:44 -0600
Pierre Pronchery <[email protected]> • #23727
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Sun, 28 May 2023 09:08:32 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23726
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Fri, 26 May 2023 10:25:46 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23725
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Fri, 26 May 2023 17:31:37 +0200
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> • #23724
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Fri, 26 May 2023 19:21:04 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[email protected]> • #23723
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386) [armv7 specific note]
Fri, 26 May 2023 00:03:30 +0000
Brooks Davis <[email protected]> • #23722
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386) [armv7 specific note]
Thu, 25 May 2023 16:53:00 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23721
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386) [armv7 specific note]
Thu, 25 May 2023 17:48:28 +0000
Brooks Davis <[email protected]> • #23720
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 17:28:41 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23719
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 07:18:23 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23718
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 07:03:14 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23717
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 06:37:33 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23716
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 13:49:28 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23715
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 13:42:46 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23714
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 03:57:28 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23713
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Thu, 25 May 2023 07:34:41 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23712
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 17:00:55 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23711
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 15:33:10 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23710
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 23:15:08 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23709
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 13:41:58 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23708
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 09:52:59 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23707
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 16:20:02 +0100
Jessica Clarke <[email protected]> • #23706
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386) [armv7 specific note]
Wed, 24 May 2023 07:55:15 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23705
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 09:25:24 -0500
Kyle Evans <[email protected]> • #23704
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 11:47:02 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23703
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 06:53:53 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> • #23702
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 08:35:55 +0200
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> • #23701
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Wed, 24 May 2023 08:28:50 +0200
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> • #23700
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 09:19:21 +0300
Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> • #23699
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Tue, 23 May 2023 23:59:09 -0400
Charlie Li <[email protected]> • #23698
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 03:56:27 +0200
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> • #23697
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Wed, 24 May 2023 03:49:55 +0200
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> • #23696
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Tue, 23 May 2023 18:53:47 -0500
Kyle Evans <[email protected]> • #23695
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Tue, 23 May 2023 16:46:51 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23694
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Tue, 23 May 2023 16:39:52 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23693
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Tue, 23 May 2023 09:30:07 -0400
Mark Johnston <[email protected]> • #23692
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Tue, 23 May 2023 08:42:11 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> • #23691
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Tue, 23 May 2023 08:00:53 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23690
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Tue, 23 May 2023 00:54:12 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23689
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 13:16:27 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23688
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 08:28:13 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23687
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 12:00:31 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23686
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 11:56:17 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23685
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 10:49:43 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23684
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Sun, 21 May 2023 21:19:53 -0400
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23683
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 03:18:39 +0300
Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> • #23682
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Sun, 21 May 2023 17:34:26 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23681
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Sun, 21 May 2023 16:07:52 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23680
Re: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Mon, 22 May 2023 00:18:14 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23679
RE: [RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Sun, 21 May 2023 14:24:51 -0700
Mark Millard <[email protected]> • #23678
[RFC] An idea for general kernel post-processing automation in FreeBSD
Sun, 21 May 2023 22:13:20 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23677
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Sat, 20 May 2023 14:14:17 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23676
Re: Delay in 14.0-RELEASE cycle and blocking items
Mon, 15 May 2023 21:30:28 +0200
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> • #23675
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Fri, 12 May 2023 02:23:26 +0100
Jamie Landeg-Jones <[email protected]> • #23674
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 11 May 2023 10:45:18 -0500
Kyle Evans <[email protected]> • #23673
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 11 May 2023 07:54:25 -0700
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> • #23672
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 11 May 2023 09:22:44 +0200
Antoine Brodin <[email protected]> • #23671
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 11 May 2023 06:30:51 +0200
Pierre Pronchery <[email protected]> • #23670
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 09 May 2023 20:12:11 +0200
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> • #23669
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Mon, 8 May 2023 16:11:12 -0400
Ed Maste <[email protected]> • #23668
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Mon, 8 May 2023 12:01:33 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23667
Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
Sun, 7 May 2023 17:10:14 -0600
Rebecca Cran <[email protected]> • #23666
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Sun, 7 May 2023 16:24:52 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23665
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Sun, 7 May 2023 23:51:34 +0200
Moin Rahman <[email protected]> • #23664
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Sun, 7 May 2023 23:19:01 +0200
Jan Bramkamp <[email protected]> • #23663
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Fri, 5 May 2023 16:03:15 -0400
Ed Maste <[email protected]> • #23662
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Fri, 05 May 2023 16:08:24 +0000
Jonathan Vasquez <[email protected]> • #23661
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Fri, 5 May 2023 17:52:29 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> • #23660
Re: Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Fri, 5 May 2023 17:23:15 +0200
Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> • #23659
Support for more than 256 CPU cores
Fri, 5 May 2023 09:38:25 -0400
Ed Maste <[email protected]> • #23658
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 4 May 2023 09:30:45 -0700
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> • #23657
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 4 May 2023 18:07:47 +0200
Moin Rahman <[email protected]> • #23656
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Wed, 3 May 2023 20:38:00 -0700
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> • #23655
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Wed, 3 May 2023 16:54:53 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23654
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Wed, 3 May 2023 17:36:24 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23653
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Thu, 4 May 2023 01:02:52 +0200
Pierre Pronchery <[email protected]> • #23652
Re: OpenSSL in the FreeBSD base system / FreeBSD 14
Tue, 2 May 2023 23:35:58 -0700
Xin Li <[email protected]> • #23651
Re: OpenSSL in the FreeBSD base system / FreeBSD 14
Tue, 2 May 2023 23:22:18 -0700
Xin Li <[email protected]> • #23650
Re: OpenSSL in the FreeBSD base system / FreeBSD 14
Tue, 2 May 2023 23:02:33 -0700
Xin Li <[email protected]> • #23649
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Wed, 3 May 2023 03:14:43 +0200
Moin Rahman <[email protected]> • #23648
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 02 May 2023 14:55:57 -0700
Cy Schubert <[email protected]> • #23647
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 02 May 2023 14:55:57 -0700
Cy Schubert <[email protected]> • #23646
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 2 May 2023 17:52:22 -0400
Jung-uk Kim <[email protected]> • #23645
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 2 May 2023 14:24:05 -0700
John Baldwin <[email protected]> • #23644
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 2 May 2023 13:26:24 -0700
Enji Cooper <[email protected]> • #23643
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 2 May 2023 13:47:33 -0600
Warner Losh <[email protected]> • #23642
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 2 May 2023 12:02:06 -0700
Cy Schubert <[email protected]> • #23641
Re: OpenSSL 3.0 for 14.0-RELEASE: issues with 1.x/3.x symbol clashing, ports linking against base OpenSSL, ports that don't compile/link against OpenSSL 3, etc
Tue, 2 May 2023 10:42:32 -0400
Jung-uk Kim <[email protected]> • #23640
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.