gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net archive

4800 archived articles, newest first (page 39 of 48). Latest articles →

[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:49:40 +0000
[email protected] • #67666
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:49:22 +0000
[email protected] • #67665
Re: issue with ICMP with PF and nat and latest 14.1
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 22:01:39 +0000
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #67664
Re: issue with ICMP with PF and nat and latest 14.1
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 23:48:01 +0200
"Herbert J. Skuhra" <[email protected]> • #67663
issue with ICMP with PF and nat and latest 14.1
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 23:34:16 +0200
Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> • #67662
[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 19:07:36 +0000
[email protected] • #67661
[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:19:31 +0000
[email protected] • #67660
[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:55:47 +0000
[email protected] • #67659
Does the UDP socket in FreeBSD actually use a send buffer to store packets like Linux?
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 21:01:16 +0800
dashuai wu <[email protected]> • #67658
[Bug 278028] VXLAN interface is not working
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:56:59 +0000
[email protected] • #67657
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:52:27 +0000
[email protected] • #67656
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:40:37 +0000
[email protected] • #67655
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:39:46 +0000
[email protected] • #67654
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:34:47 +0000
[email protected] • #67653
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:34:25 +0000
[email protected] • #67652
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:34:03 +0000
[email protected] • #67651
[Bug 280648] Traffic leak between fibs
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:33:13 +0000
[email protected] • #67650
[Bug 281460] if_ovpn doesn't work with crypto.ko
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:31:17 +0000
[email protected] • #67649
[Bug 281460] if_ovpn doesn't work with crypto.ko
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:25:54 +0000
[email protected] • #67648
[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:39:01 +0000
[email protected] • #67647
Re: IPv6 neighbor flaps for ISP router are occurring frequently
Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:46:05 -0400
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #67646
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:25:07 +0800
Zhenlei Huang <[email protected]> • #67645
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:12:50 -0700
Chris <[email protected]> • #67644
Re: IPv6 neighbor flaps for ISP router are occurring frequently
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:02:21 -0400
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #67643
Re: IPv6 neighbor flaps for ISP router are occurring frequently
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:55:52 -0400
Karl Denninger <[email protected]> • #67642
Re: IPv6 neighbor flaps for ISP router are occurring frequently
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:45:44 -0400
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #67641
IPv6 neighbor flaps for ISP router are occurring frequently
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:05:39 -0400
Chris Ross <[email protected]> • #67640
[Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT)
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:40:21 +0000
[email protected] • #67639
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:32:11 +0200
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> • #67638
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:08:52 +0100
Doug Rabson <[email protected]> • #67637
Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:15:30 +1000
Simon Burge <[email protected]> • #67636
[Bug 281391] IPv6 multicast sent to wrong MAC address
Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:34:08 +0000
[email protected] • #67635
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:00:37 +0000
[email protected] • #67634
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Sun, 15 Sep 2024 18:56:54 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67633
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:44:51 +0200
Marek Zarychta <[email protected]> • #67632
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Sun, 15 Sep 2024 18:01:07 +0100
Doug Rabson <[email protected]> • #67631
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:25:16 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67630
[Bug 272573] Lock order reversal with OpenVPN over UDP (udpinp)
Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:01:56 +0000
[email protected] • #67629
[Bug 281452] Realtek 'if_re' module crashes on module load
Sat, 14 Sep 2024 03:56:49 +0000
[email protected] • #67628
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:45:03 +0800
Zhenlei Huang <[email protected]> • #67627
[Bug 281452] Realtek 'if_re' module crashes on module load
Sat, 14 Sep 2024 00:48:15 +0000
[email protected] • #67626
[Bug 281460] if_ovpn doesn't work with crypto.ko
Sat, 14 Sep 2024 00:34:33 +0000
[email protected] • #67625
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:54:39 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67624
Re: Ethernet device with shared mdio
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:13:32 +0200
Milan Obuch <[email protected]> • #67623
Re: Ethernet device with shared mdio
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:40:55 +0000
Mike Belanger <[email protected]> • #67622
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:08:02 -0400
Mark Saad <[email protected]> • #67621
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:09:38 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67620
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:36:59 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67619
Re: Ethernet device with shared mdio
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:07:47 +0200
Milan Obuch <[email protected]> • #67618
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:03:56 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67617
[Bug 272416] Seldom crash happening with RTL8125
Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:18:49 +0000
[email protected] • #67616
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:20:23 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67615
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:50:20 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67614
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:00:14 +0200
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> • #67613
Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:25:32 -0400
Paul Procacci <[email protected]> • #67612
Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:16:18 +0100
Sad Clouds <[email protected]> • #67611
[Bug 272416] Seldom crash happening with RTL8125
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:20:05 +0000
[email protected] • #67610
[Bug 280036] Data corruption over if_ovpn (OpenVPN DCO) observed
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:03:50 +0000
[email protected] • #67609
[Bug 280036] Data corruption over if_ovpn (OpenVPN DCO) observed
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:53:33 +0000
[email protected] • #67608
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:04:35 +0100
David Chisnall <[email protected]> • #67607
[Bug 272416] Seldom crash happening with RTL8125
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 06:33:52 +0000
[email protected] • #67606
Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:13:12 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> • #67605
Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 03:26:14 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67604
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 02:57:17 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67603
[Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute)
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:47:54 +0000
[email protected] • #67602
[Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute)
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:47:54 +0000
[email protected] • #67601
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:21:09 +0100
David Chisnall <[email protected]> • #67600
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:05:18 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67599
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:14:44 +0800
Philip Paeps <[email protected]> • #67598
Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:55:15 -0800
Rob Wing <[email protected]> • #67597
That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:47:35 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67596
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:05:21 -0800
Rob Wing <[email protected]> • #67595
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:12:28 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67594
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:04:40 +0100
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #67593
[Bug 281391] IPv6 multicast sent to wrong MAC address
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:24:40 +0000
[email protected] • #67592
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:17:11 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67591
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:58:25 +0100
David Chisnall <[email protected]> • #67590
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:41:20 +0000
"Gavin D. Howard" <[email protected]> • #67589
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:32:56 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> • #67588
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:29:19 -0400
Justin Hibbits <[email protected]> • #67587
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:24:24 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #67586
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:44:47 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67585
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:35:11 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> • #67584
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:09:15 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67583
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:59:02 +0100
David Chisnall <[email protected]> • #67582
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:24:07 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> • #67581
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:51:08 +0100
Bob Bishop <[email protected]> • #67580
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:45:57 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67579
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:31:43 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #67578
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:08:07 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #67577
Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:38:50 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> • #67576
Re: [tcpdump-workers] BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:03:39 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #67575
BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 04:05:44 +0300
Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> • #67574
[Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute)
Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:41:06 +0000
[email protected] • #67573
[Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute)
Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:04:54 +0000
[email protected] • #67572
[Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute)
Mon, 09 Sep 2024 17:53:25 +0000
[email protected] • #67571
[Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute)
Mon, 09 Sep 2024 17:38:34 +0000
[email protected] • #67570
Re: Support for Firebox M270 and the Intel X553 MDIO
Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:52:13 -0400
Jason Hensler <[email protected]> • #67569
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 8 Sep 2024 21:00:48 +0000
[email protected] • #67568
[Bug 281211] MV88E6190X switch variant not supported by e6000sw
Fri, 06 Sep 2024 18:41:30 +0000
[email protected] • #67567
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.