gmane.os.freebsd.devel.pf4freebsd archive

390 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

[Bug 297678] pf: page fault in pf_step_into_anchor()
Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:36:54 +0000
[email protected] • #10321
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 01:28:21 +0000
[email protected] • #10320
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:41:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10319
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:41:00 +0000
[email protected] • #10318
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 10:05:22 +0000
[email protected] • #10317
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:48:13 +0000
[email protected] • #10316
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:37:02 +0000
[email protected] • #10315
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:37:48 +0000
[email protected] • #10314
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:27:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10313
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Sat, 08 Aug 2026 09:08:20 +0000
[email protected] • #10312
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:35:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10311
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Thu, 06 Aug 2026 18:48:59 +0000
[email protected] • #10310
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Thu, 06 Aug 2026 17:45:34 +0000
[email protected] • #10309
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:38:14 +0000
[email protected] • #10308
[Bug 297307] if_pfsync: pfsync_sendout() silently and permanently fails to transmit when pfsync MTU exceeds MJUMPAGESIZE
Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:38:14 +0000
[email protected] • #10307
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:45:09 +0000
[email protected] • #10306
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:45:09 +0000
[email protected] • #10305
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 19:40:46 +0000
[email protected] • #10304
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:56:35 +0000
[email protected] • #10303
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 13:34:37 +0000
[email protected] • #10302
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 13:29:31 +0000
[email protected] • #10301
[Bug 297264] Exploitable bug in PF_KEY?
Tue, 04 Aug 2026 13:29:31 +0000
[email protected] • #10300
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:02:44 +0000
[email protected] • #10299
[Bug 290811] pf panic on kldload
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:04:05 +0000
[email protected] • #10298
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:48:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10297
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:45:57 +0000
[email protected] • #10296
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:42:27 +0000
[email protected] • #10295
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:44:18 +0000
[email protected] • #10294
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:03:01 -0500
Kyle Evans <[email protected]> • #10293
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:48:39 +0000
[email protected] • #10292
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:37:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10291
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:12:16 +0200
Kristof Provost <[email protected]> • #10290
[Bug 296958] authpf(8): read_config() never strips trailing whitespace, silently misconfiguring the gateway
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:30:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10289
[Bug 296958] authpf(8): read_config() never strips trailing whitespace, silently misconfiguring the gateway
Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:30:50 +0000
[email protected] • #10288
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:15:01 +0530
Avinash Duduskar <[email protected]> • #10287
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:36:11 +0200
Kristof Provost <[email protected]> • #10286
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:10:35 +0200
Kristof Provost <[email protected]> • #10285
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:21:49 +0530
Avinash Duduskar <[email protected]> • #10284
Re: PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:17:37 +0200
Kristof Provost <[email protected]> • #10283
PR 291981: authpf under netlink, and a pfctl adoption flag
Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:02:41 +0530
Avinash Duduskar <[email protected]> • #10282
[Bug 296958] authpf(8): read_config() never strips trailing whitespace, silently misconfiguring the gateway
Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:30:19 +0000
[email protected] • #10281
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:09:56 +0000
[email protected] • #10280
[Bug 296958] authpf(8): read_config() never strips trailing whitespace, silently misconfiguring the gateway
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:13:13 +0000
[email protected] • #10279
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:10:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10278
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:04:36 +0000
[email protected] • #10277
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:39:56 +0000
[email protected] • #10276
[Bug 291763] pfctl: loginterface packet counts for pass/block swapped; byte counts all 0
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:11:42 +0000
[email protected] • #10275
[Bug 295043] pf: per-packet microuptime() calls from 0493260115db cause major throughput regression with expensive timecounters
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:04:10 +0000
[email protected] • #10274
[Bug 260867] pf: divert-to packets infinitely loop when written back to divert socket
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 18:22:43 +0000
[email protected] • #10273
[Bug 86635] pfctl(8): allow new page character (^L) in pf.conf
Sat, 18 Jul 2026 09:24:59 +0000
[email protected] • #10272
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:22:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10271
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:37:17 +0000
[email protected] • #10270
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:32:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10269
[Bug 294989] pf: NULL pointer dereference in pf_sctp_multihome_detach_addr() via crafted pfsync state injection - Remote kernel panic
Fri, 17 Jul 2026 06:58:03 +0000
[email protected] • #10268
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:33:50 +0000
[email protected] • #10267
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:25:03 +0000
[email protected] • #10266
[Bug 296838] pf: cannot reload ruleset in securelevel 2
Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:21:45 +0000
[email protected] • #10265
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 12 Jul 2026 21:00:38 +0000
[email protected] • #10264
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Wed, 08 Jul 2026 18:58:06 +0000
[email protected] • #10263
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Wed, 08 Jul 2026 16:02:11 +0000
[email protected] • #10262
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Wed, 08 Jul 2026 12:57:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10261
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:14:56 +0000
[email protected] • #10260
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:43:42 +0000
[email protected] • #10259
[Bug 296577] pfctl cannot replace an existing table in the non anchor case
Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:30:26 +0000
[email protected] • #10258
[Bug 296554] pfctl no longer can open /dev/pf in read only mode
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 17:03:44 +0000
[email protected] • #10257
[Bug 291981] authpf/pfctl DIOCBEGINADDRS: Operation not permitted
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 17:03:44 +0000
[email protected] • #10256
[Bug 291981] authpf/pfctl DIOCBEGINADDRS: Operation not permitted
Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:18:15 +0000
[email protected] • #10255
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 5 Jul 2026 21:00:33 +0000
[email protected] • #10254
[Bug 296521] bin/pfctl: pf's netlink conversion blocks non-VNET jails from using pfctl (no allow.pf / RTNL_F_ALLOW_NONVNET_JAIL equivalent)
Sun, 05 Jul 2026 10:12:10 +0000
[email protected] • #10253
[Bug 296521] bin/pfctl: pf's netlink conversion blocks non-VNET jails from using pfctl (no allow.pf / RTNL_F_ALLOW_NONVNET_JAIL equivalent)
Sun, 05 Jul 2026 08:30:27 +0000
[email protected] • #10252
[Bug 296521] bin/pfctl: pf's netlink conversion blocks non-VNET jails from using pfctl (no allow.pf / RTNL_F_ALLOW_NONVNET_JAIL equivalent)
Sun, 05 Jul 2026 02:25:30 +0000
[email protected] • #10251
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 28 Jun 2026 21:00:06 +0000
[email protected] • #10250
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:00:44 +0000
[email protected] • #10249
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 14 Jun 2026 21:00:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10248
[Bug 284625] pf NAT with SMSC9512/9514 drops packets when RXCSUM is enabled (default setting)
Sun, 14 Jun 2026 11:53:54 +0000
[email protected] • #10247
[Bug 295043] pf: per-packet microuptime() calls from 0493260115db cause major throughput regression with expensive timecounters
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:29:15 +0000
[email protected] • #10246
[Bug 294859] pfctl -vnf and pfctl -vf  output differs for identical input
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:24:22 +0000
[email protected] • #10245
[Bug 294860] pfctl: optimizer removes textually-identical rules without checking for intervening state changes
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:23:54 +0000
[email protected] • #10244
[Bug 294858] pfctl -o none fails to skip optimization
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:23:17 +0000
[email protected] • #10243
[Bug 263774] service pf reload does not check that pf is running
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:48:35 +0000
[email protected] • #10242
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 7 Jun 2026 21:00:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10241
[Bug 289905] pf: Behavior change when using interface addresses (as intf:0) in pf.conf on interfaces that have multiple address families configured
Sat, 06 Jun 2026 11:26:31 +0000
[email protected] • #10240
[Bug 290925] Kernel panic in pf_purge
Sat, 06 Jun 2026 07:55:05 +0000
[email protected] • #10239
[Bug 287462] pfctl fails to warn when an interface is specified but does not exist
Fri, 05 Jun 2026 12:22:15 +0000
[email protected] • #10238
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 31 May 2026 21:00:03 +0000
[email protected] • #10237
[Bug 263774] service pf reload does not check that pf is running
Thu, 28 May 2026 12:08:39 +0000
[email protected] • #10236
[Bug 263774] service pf reload does not check that pf is running
Wed, 27 May 2026 21:38:15 +0000
[email protected] • #10235
[Bug 263774] service pf reload does not check that pf is running
Wed, 27 May 2026 21:38:02 +0000
[email protected] • #10234
[Bug 282496] PF source tracking counter wrapping around
Tue, 26 May 2026 07:08:54 +0000
[email protected] • #10233
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 24 May 2026 21:00:37 +0000
[email protected] • #10232
[Bug 272094] pfilctl IPFW hook order not works with PF route-to
Fri, 22 May 2026 00:31:22 +0000
[email protected] • #10231
[Bug 295043] pf: per-packet microuptime() calls from 0493260115db cause major throughput regression with expensive timecounters
Thu, 21 May 2026 21:20:10 +0000
[email protected] • #10230
[Bug 273618] Port redirects for packets received on loopback have bad checksums
Thu, 21 May 2026 15:31:18 +0000
[email protected] • #10229
[Bug 290925] Kernel panic in pf_purge
Mon, 18 May 2026 01:34:32 +0000
[email protected] • #10228
Problem reports for [email protected] that need special attention
Sun, 17 May 2026 21:00:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10227
[Bug 277093] pf: Assertion failed: (elems <= maxelems), function pf_nvuint_32_array on stable/14 with RACK
Sun, 17 May 2026 15:16:33 +0000
[email protected] • #10226
[Bug 277093] pf: Assertion failed: (elems <= maxelems), function pf_nvuint_32_array on stable/14 with RACK
Sun, 17 May 2026 14:44:39 +0000
[email protected] • #10225
[Bug 295064] pfctl: rejects weird interface names in dynamic address references
Sat, 16 May 2026 16:45:00 +0000
[email protected] • #10224
[Bug 295064] pfctl: rejects weird interface names in dynamic address references
Sat, 16 May 2026 16:45:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10223
[Bug 275280] PF `route-to` and `dnpipe` are not works on the same rule
Fri, 15 May 2026 23:51:19 +0000
[email protected] • #10222
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.