gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance archive

385 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Planned closure of this mailing list
Mon, 20 May 2019 20:31:03 +0200
Maxime Villard <[email protected]> • #761
Planned closure of this mailing list
Mon, 20 May 2019 19:06:03 +0200
Maxime Villard <[email protected]> • #760
=?UTF-8?B??=
Mon, 07 Jul 2014 22:52:30 +0200
"Townldb" <[email protected]> • #759
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:34:12 +0100
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #758
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:29:32 -0800
Brian Buhrow <[email protected]> • #757
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:24:17 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #756
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:14:58 +0100
"J. Hannken-Illjes" <[email protected]> • #755
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:52:25 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #754
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:20:59 -0800
Brian Buhrow <[email protected]> • #753
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:41:28 +0100
"J. Hannken-Illjes" <[email protected]> • #752
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:07:15 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #751
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:02:46 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #750
Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:15:08 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #749
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:39:57 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #748
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:18:12 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #747
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:12:37 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #746
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:23:15 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #745
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:21:12 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #744
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:10:57 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #743
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:25:24 -0500
"Martin S. Weber" <[email protected]> • #742
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:33:44 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #741
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:47:18 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #740
Re: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:29:44 -0800
Brian Buhrow <[email protected]> • #739
WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:46:36 +0100
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #738
Re: fork performance
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) • #737
Re: fork performance
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:42:17 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #736
Re: fork performance
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:26:36 +0100
David Laight <[email protected]> • #735
Re: fork performance
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:05:02 +0200
Lars Heidieker <[email protected]> • #734
Re: fork performance
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:41:51 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #733
Re: fork performance
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:27:39 +0900
Masao Uebayashi <[email protected]> • #732
Re: fork performance
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:54:48 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #731
Re: fork performance
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:39:36 +0200
Lars Heidieker <[email protected]> • #730
Re: fork performance
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:15:15 +0100
David Laight <[email protected]> • #729
Re: fork performance
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:36:18 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #728
Re: fork performance
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:47:22 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #727
fork performance
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:52:47 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #726
slow pipes chewing up system time (and real time)?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:12:05 +1300
Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]> • #725
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:05:37 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #724
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:27:46 +0100
David Laight <[email protected]> • #723
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:08:51 -0700
Tony Bourke <[email protected]> • #722
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:13:10 +0200
"Marcin M. Jessa" <[email protected]> • #721
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:15:53 +0100
David Laight <[email protected]> • #720
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:01:02 +0100
Matthias Scheler <[email protected]> • #719
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:57:23 +0100
Matthias Scheler <[email protected]> • #718
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:32:47 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #717
re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:17:43 +1100
matthew green <[email protected]> • #716
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Hisashi T Fujinaka <[email protected]> • #715
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:36:41 -0700
Tony Bourke <[email protected]> • #714
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Hisashi T Fujinaka <[email protected]> • #713
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:32:26 -0700
Tony Bourke <[email protected]> • #712
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:12:02 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #711
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:19:59 -0700
Tony Bourke <[email protected]> • #710
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:09:31 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #709
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:24:55 -0500
David Young <[email protected]> • #708
Re: [SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:05:02 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #707
[SOLVED]Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 20:38:50 +0530
Ravishankar S <[email protected]> • #706
Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:08:48 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #705
Re: Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:47:31 +0200
Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #704
Only 8 MB/sec write throughput with NetBSD 5.1 AMD64
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:22:14 +0530
Ravishankar S <[email protected]> • #703
[ 9lkw0nndiksbqwsf] : Business contact list for Canadian businesses
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:28:32 -0700
"Booth people" <[email protected]> • #702
Technical Support
Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:41:12 -0500
"Webmaster Helpdesk Support" <[email protected]> • #701
We have lists with emails for doctors, lawyers, businesses and many more
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:21:37 +0800 (CST)
"Doris Hull" <[email protected]> • #700
Re: extreamly slow read/write from/to USB stick on 5.1_RC3
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:54:13 +0300
Aleksey Cheusov <[email protected]> • #699
Re: extreamly slow read/write from/to USB stick on 5.1_RC3
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:27:59 -0700
Erik Fair <[email protected]> • #698
extreamly slow read/write from/to USB stick on 5.1_RC3
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:37:16 +0300
Aleksey Cheusov <[email protected]> • #697
US Surgery Centers marketing email list
Mon, 10 May 2010 19:34:25 -0400
"objectivity Costello" <[email protected]> • #696
US Surgery Centers marketing email list
Sun, 2 May 2010 05:00:37 +0000 (UTC)
"virtual Nance" <[email protected]> • #695
New 1.8.7 charts with FreeBSD 7.2
Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:26:12 -0500
[email protected] • #694
FreeBSD tested with ln -s jz /etc/malloc.conf
Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:15:43 -0500
[email protected] • #693
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:38:51 -0500
[email protected] • #692
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:41:10 +0400
Aleksej Saushev <[email protected]> • #691
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:17:20 +0200
"Marcin M. Jessa" <[email protected]> • #690
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:19:18 +0200
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #689
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:07:03 +0200
Zafer Aydoğan <[email protected]> • #688
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:55:39 +0200
Zafer Aydoğan <[email protected]> • #687
Re: Ruby Benchmarks
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:29:13 +0400
Aleksej Saushev <[email protected]> • #686
Ruby Benchmarks
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:07:58 +0200
Zafer Aydoğan <[email protected]> • #685
Re: Running XENU on vnodes.
Sun, 17 May 2009 23:20:05 -0400
Matthew Mondor <[email protected]> • #684
Another FreeBSD/NetBSD comparison
Fri, 1 May 2009 23:53:16 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #683
Untarring on NFS
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:52:14 +0100 (CET)
"Joel Carnat" <[email protected]> • #682
Re: ISC DNS performance test
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:31:48 +0100
Andrew Doran <[email protected]> • #680
Re: ISC DNS performance test
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:08:05 -0700
Alfred Perlstein <[email protected]> • #679
Re: ISC DNS performance test
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:05:28 -0400
Jim Wise <[email protected]> • #678
Re: ISC DNS performance test
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:51:55 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #677
Re: ISC DNS performance test
Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:31:01 -0400
Jim Wise <[email protected]> • #676
Re: ISC DNS performance test
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:39:39 +0200 (CEST)
Hubert Feyrer <[email protected]> • #675
ISC DNS performance test
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:08:14 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #674
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:14:24 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #673
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:50:51 +0200
Pavel Cahyna <[email protected]> • #672
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:18:23 +0200
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[email protected]> • #671
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:59:37 -0600
Greg Oster <[email protected]> • #670
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:45:15 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #669
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:42:45 -0700
"Robert P. Thille" <[email protected]> • #668
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:48:50 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #667
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:12:28 +0200
"Zafer Aydogan" <[email protected]> • #666
recent merge (brelse(), etc.) from vmlocking improved LFS stability
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:32:49 -0400
"Blair Sadewitz" <[email protected]> • #665
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:22:42 -0700
"Robert P. Thille" <[email protected]> • #664
Re: Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:53:01 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #663
Four Drive RAID-5 on RAIDFrame Considered Harmful...
Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:59:58 -0700
"Robert P. Thille" <[email protected]> • #662
Raymundo's tremendous dick
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:20:51 +0000
"Kenneth Bergman" <[email protected]> • #661
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.