gmane.os.netbsd.devel.toolchain archive

512 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: ld compat linker warnings considered harmful
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:31:08 +0100
Robert Swindells <[email protected]> • #8300
Re: ld compat linker warnings considered harmful
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 07:26:10 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8299
Re: ld compat linker warnings considered harmful
Wed, 19 Aug 2026 04:18:40 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8298
Re: ld compat linker warnings considered harmful
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8297
ld compat linker warnings considered harmful
Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:58:58 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8296
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8295
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:35:22 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8294
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8293
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:51:32 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8292
re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:11:06 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8291
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:37:22 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8290
re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:22:09 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8289
re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:41:26 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8288
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:14:23 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8287
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:37:51 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8286
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:51:33 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8285
re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 08:43:25 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8284
Re: gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 10:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8283
gcc 16 bootstrap, stage 2 and 3 differ
Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:20:52 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #8282
Re: gcc 14 and netbsd/alpha
Mon, 3 Aug 2026 19:30:05 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #8281
gcc 14 and netbsd/alpha
Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:04:03 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8280
Re: 10.1 make oddity
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 21:03:52 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8279
re: Failed building vax on MaxOSX
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:19:34 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8278
Re: Failed building vax on MaxOSX
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 22:01:58 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #8277
Re: Failed building vax on MaxOSX
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 17:51:33 +0200
smurfd <[email protected]> • #8276
Failed building vax on MaxOSX
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:28:07 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #8275
Re: 10.1 make oddity
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 12:41:58 +0200
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8274
Re: 10.1 make oddity
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:44:05 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #8273
Re: 10.1 make oddity
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:31:06 +0200
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8272
Re: 10.1 make oddity
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 22:04:24 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8271
Re: 10.1 make oddity
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 03:06:38 +0200
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8270
10.1 make oddity
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 19:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8269
Re: C compiler (over-)optimization (was: netbsd-11 gcc bug)
Sun, 31 May 2026 14:29:30 -0500
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8268
Re: C compiler (over-)optimization (was: netbsd-11 gcc bug)
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:02:11 -0400
Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> • #8267
Re: C compiler (over-)optimization
Sat, 30 May 2026 12:30:30 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #8266
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Fri, 29 May 2026 14:31:15 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8265
Re: C compiler (over-)optimization (was: netbsd-11 gcc bug)
Fri, 29 May 2026 14:27:39 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8264
Re: C compiler (over-)optimization (was: netbsd-11 gcc bug)
Fri, 29 May 2026 14:21:18 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8263
C compiler (over-)optimization (was: netbsd-11 gcc bug)
Fri, 29 May 2026 19:12:51 +0200
Edgar Fuß <[email protected]> • #8262
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Thu, 28 May 2026 19:04:07 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8261
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Thu, 28 May 2026 18:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8260
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Thu, 28 May 2026 14:40:55 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8259
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Tue, 26 May 2026 16:12:29 +0200
Jörg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #8258
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Tue, 26 May 2026 10:02:23 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8257
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Tue, 26 May 2026 13:52:18 +0200
Jörg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #8256
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Mon, 25 May 2026 08:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8255
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Mon, 25 May 2026 00:02:17 +0000
David Holland <[email protected]> • #8254
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sun, 24 May 2026 16:53:11 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8253
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sun, 24 May 2026 11:38:59 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8252
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sun, 24 May 2026 08:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8251
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sun, 24 May 2026 10:44:49 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8250
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 19:11:18 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #8249
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sun, 24 May 2026 02:29:11 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #8248
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 20:47:16 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #8247
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 20:45:53 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #8246
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 20:38:03 +0200
Roland Illig <[email protected]> • #8245
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 13:28:31 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #8244
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 14:22:22 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8243
Re: netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 12:55:18 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #8242
netbsd-11 gcc bug
Sat, 23 May 2026 10:59:36 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #8241
Re: i915drmkms debug log issue
Sun, 10 May 2026 10:37:14 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8240
Re: System compilation with simpler compiler
Sat, 2 May 2026 09:46:33 +0200
Anders Magnusson <[email protected]> • #8239
Re: i915drmkms debug log issue
Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:28:00 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #8238
Re: System compilation with simpler compiler
Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:22:35 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8237
System compilation with simpler compiler
Mon, 27 Apr 2026 11:10:56 +0200
Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> • #8236
Re: Sign-extension bug in syscall return path on big-endian N64
Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:19:18 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #8235
Sign-extension bug in syscall return path on big-endian N64
Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:09:13 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #8234
Re: Compiling with modern Clang
Thu, 9 Apr 2026 02:19:11 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #8233
Compiling with modern Clang
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 16:44:11 -0700
FireTurtle <[email protected]> • #8232
Re: Found the source of non-reproducible builds from gfortran
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 16:40:11 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #8231
Found the source of non-reproducible builds from gfortran
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 14:51:21 +0000
[email protected] • #8230
Introduction: MINIX 3 RISC-V port reaching bootable state (Community Branch)
Mon, 12 Jan 2026 18:46:48 +0800
[email protected] • #8229
Re: 10 fails to build on linux
Fri, 26 Dec 2025 12:18:50 +0100
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #8228
10 fails to build on linux
Fri, 26 Dec 2025 12:06:03 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8227
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Tue, 09 Dec 2025 11:14:46 +0100 (CET)
Jarle Greipsland <[email protected]> • #8226
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 17:58:47 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8225
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:59:13 +0100 (CET)
Jarle Greipsland <[email protected]> • #8224
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Mon, 08 Dec 2025 01:12:27 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8223
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Mon, 8 Dec 2025 06:51:51 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #8222
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 09:33:03 +0100 (CET)
Jarle Greipsland <[email protected]> • #8221
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 22:49:32 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8220
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 22:37:43 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8219
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 08:51:20 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #8218
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:45:38 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8217
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Wed, 03 Dec 2025 10:50:12 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8216
Re: use of "build.sh -B BUILDID".... with patch and more questions
Sun, 30 Nov 2025 17:46:45 -0800
"Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> • #8215
re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:18:00 +0000 (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #8214
re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:16:52 +0000 (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #8213
re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:49:45 +0000 (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #8212
re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:15:21 +1100
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8211
re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:03:15 +1100
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8210
re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:47:45 +1100
matthew green <[email protected]> • #8209
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:17:25 +0000 (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #8208
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:51:21 +0100
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8207
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:28:09 +0000 (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #8206
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:26:01 +0000 (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> • #8205
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:29:48 +0100
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8204
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:24:13 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #8203
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 07:21:57 +0100
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8202
Re: __atomic_test_and_set() and mips o32 - help wanted
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 07:19:10 +0100
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #8201
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.