gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386 archive

597 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: Install floppies for i386
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:55:08 -0000 (UTC)
d-ra <[email protected]> • #16762
Re: Install floppies for i386
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:40:35 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #16761
Install floppies for i386
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 01:13:20 -0000 (UTC)
d-ra <[email protected]> • #16760
Re: Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Wed, 13 May 2026 11:37:04 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #16759
Re: Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Tue, 12 May 2026 17:41:46 +0200
[email protected] • #16758
Re: Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Tue, 12 May 2026 22:29:21 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #16757
Re: Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Tue, 12 May 2026 11:21:00 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #16756
Re: Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Tue, 12 May 2026 11:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #16755
Re: Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Tue, 12 May 2026 18:03:52 +0300
Valery Ushakov <[email protected]> • #16754
Trying to boot NetBSD on '97 Pentium I @ 200 MHz
Tue, 12 May 2026 09:19:40 -0400
[email protected] • #16753
Re: shadowfb artifacts when scrolling back.
Sun, 10 May 2026 10:01:40 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #16752
Re: Tyan Tomcat IIID Dual Pentium 166mmx Double Fault on Boot
Fri, 1 May 2026 23:33:11 +0300
Andrius V <[email protected]> • #16751
Tyan Tomcat IIID Dual Pentium 166mmx Double Fault on Boot
Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:24:46 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16750
shadowfb artifacts when scrolling back.
Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:54:59 +0200
[email protected] • #16749
Re: i915drmkms debug log issue
Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:15:18 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #16748
i915drmkms debug log issue
Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:53:00 +0800
Rui-Xiang Guo <[email protected]> • #16747
Re: patch: shadowfb also for non-EFI boots
Fri, 24 Apr 2026 21:40:06 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #16746
Re: patch: shadowfb also for non-EFI boots
Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:07:58 +0200
Ignatios Souvatzis <[email protected]> • #16745
Re: patch: shadowfb also for non-EFI boots
Thu, 9 Apr 2026 00:28:12 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #16744
patch: shadowfb also for non-EFI boots
Wed, 8 Apr 2026 19:56:39 +0200
[email protected] • #16743
NetBSD 11.0_RC2 i386 boot floppies
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 01:21:32 -0400
linear cannon <[email protected]> • #16742
Re: Adapters [IBM LAN Adapter/A for Ethernet]
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 23:48:58 +0100
Eirik Øverby <[email protected]> • #16741
Adapters [IBM LAN Adapter/A for Ethernet]
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:17:58 -0600
Louis Ohland <[email protected]> • #16740
Support for OPTi 82C931 based sound card
Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:19:12 +0000
luRaichu <[email protected]> • #16739
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sun, 31 Aug 2025 21:44:09 -0700
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16738
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sun, 31 Aug 2025 14:10:58 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16737
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sun, 31 Aug 2025 10:26:01 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16736
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sun, 31 Aug 2025 10:19:48 -0400
Jason Thorpe <[email protected]> • #16735
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sat, 30 Aug 2025 13:49:28 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16734
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:24:20 -0500
"Jonathan A. Kollasch" <[email protected]> • #16733
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sat, 30 Aug 2025 06:40:46 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #16732
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sat, 30 Aug 2025 06:21:55 -0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Michael van Elst) • #16731
Re: Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:15:14 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #16730
Attempt to Add a New Tulip PNIC2 82C115 NIC Not Working
Fri, 29 Aug 2025 21:47:38 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16729
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Mon, 4 Aug 2025 14:27:54 +0200
Jörg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #16728
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Mon, 04 Aug 2025 06:43:59 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #16727
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Mon, 4 Aug 2025 03:58:22 +0000 (UTC)
RVP <[email protected]> • #16726
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Sun, 3 Aug 2025 23:17:34 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #16725
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Sun, 03 Aug 2025 10:12:56 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #16724
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Sun, 3 Aug 2025 10:07:20 +0200
Mark Ter Morshuizen <[email protected]> • #16723
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Fri, 1 Aug 2025 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #16722
Re: How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Fri, 01 Aug 2025 10:04:07 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #16721
How to re-compile sshd for a 386
Fri, 1 Aug 2025 15:21:04 +0200
Mark Ter Morshuizen <[email protected]> • #16720
Fail to boot on a 486DLC
Wed, 28 May 2025 22:30:16 +0200
[email protected] • #16719
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Fri, 16 May 2025 06:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #16718
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Fri, 16 May 2025 19:33:23 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #16717
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Fri, 16 May 2025 11:12:38 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #16716
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Tue, 13 May 2025 13:07:04 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #16715
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 18:12:58 +0300
Andrew Randrianasulu <[email protected]> • #16714
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #16713
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 14:39:10 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #16712
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 07:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #16711
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 10:29:27 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #16710
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 06:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #16709
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 06:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #16708
Re: Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sun, 11 May 2025 09:29:02 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #16707
Proposal to enhance boot path selections
Sat, 10 May 2025 22:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #16706
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:31:36 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #16705
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:13:51 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #16704
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:00:58 -0400
Brad Spencer <[email protected]> • #16703
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #16702
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:50:40 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #16701
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:33:00 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #16700
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:25:14 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #16699
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:08:52 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #16698
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:37:06 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #16697
Re: Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:23:52 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse <[email protected]> • #16696
Converting PV to HVM - boot methods
Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:06:53 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill <[email protected]> • #16695
Re: [PATCH] Handling large XSAVE space (Intel AMX)
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:29:00 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #16694
Re: [PATCH] Handling large XSAVE space (Intel AMX)
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:51:47 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #16693
Re: [PATCH] Handling large XSAVE space (Intel AMX)
Mon, 14 Apr 2025 06:35:12 +0000
Emmanuel Dreyfus <[email protected]> • #16692
Re: [PATCH] Handling large XSAVE space (Intel AMX)
Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:53:52 +0200
Harold Gutch <[email protected]> • #16691
[PATCH] Handling large XSAVE space (Intel AMX)
Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:53:05 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #16690
NetBSD PR #57821 affects port-i386 as well
Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:12:45 -0700
[email protected] (beaker) • #16689
PCMCIA wd1a device timeout -- lost interrupt
Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:29:06 -0800
Joel <[email protected]> • #16688
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Thu, 10 Oct 2024 22:46:17 +0200 (CEST)
Martin Neitzel <[email protected]> • #16687
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:46:10 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16686
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:41:09 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16685
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Wed, 9 Oct 2024 02:57:43 +0500
Vitaly Shevtsov <[email protected]> • #16684
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Wed, 9 Oct 2024 13:36:00 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16683
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Wed, 09 Oct 2024 06:04:04 +0200
Ramiro Aceves <[email protected]> • #16682
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:26:01 +0100
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #16681
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:38:04 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16680
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:23:07 +0200
Rhialto <[email protected]> • #16679
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:55:32 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16678
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:37:07 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16677
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 23:24:40 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #16676
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 14:35:19 +0100
Mike Pumford <[email protected]> • #16675
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 21:39:59 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16674
Re: Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 08:51:46 +0000
nia <[email protected]> • #16673
Call for tests: DRM fixes for upcoming NetBSD 10.1
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 14:38:30 +0900
Rin Okuyama <[email protected]> • #16672
vio9p vs. GENERIC.local vs. XEN3_DOM[0U]
Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:48:39 +0200
Christoph Badura <[email protected]> • #16671
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:28:43 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #16670
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:27:45 -0400
"J. Alexander Jacocks" <[email protected]> • #16669
re: HEADS UP: plan to switch many ports over to GCC 12 soon
Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:40:22 +1000
matthew green <[email protected]> • #16668
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:59:37 -0400
"J. Alexander Jacocks" <[email protected]> • #16667
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:55:21 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16666
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:04:24 +0200
Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> • #16665
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:58:34 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16664
Re: 10.0 DMA Issues With SIS-5597/5598 Chipset
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:39:37 -0400
Alexander Jacocks <[email protected]> • #16663
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.