gmane.text.unicode.general archive

384 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sun, 14 Jun 2026 07:30:48 -0400
Phil Smith III via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10533
Re: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:01:57 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10532
RE: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 20:44:11 +0200
Piotr Karocki via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10531
Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:04:47 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10530
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:12:28 +0200
Piotr Karocki via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10529
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 01:29:44 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10528
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:07:28 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10527
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 22:05:59 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10526
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:46:12 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10525
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:37:07 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10524
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:34:51 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10523
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:27:24 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10522
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:15:09 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10521
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 20:31:17 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10520
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:29:21 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10519
Re: Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 20:01:05 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10518
Re: Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 16:41:28 -0700
asmusf--- via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10517
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 18:42:45 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10516
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 02:55:53 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10515
Re: Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 19:44:52 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10514
RE: Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 14:37:53 +0000
Peter Constable via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10513
Re: Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Tue, 2 Jun 2026 12:08:31 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10512
Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:30:44 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10511
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:01:00 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10510
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 19:44:42 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10509
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:44:55 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10508
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:41:41 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10507
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:28:00 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10506
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 17:27:04 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10505
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:25:44 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10504
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:17:15 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10503
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:05:34 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10502
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 30 May 2026 12:54:50 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10501
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 30 May 2026 01:34:55 -0700
Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10500
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 22:25:31 -0700
Tex via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10499
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 20:43:24 -0700
Bill Poser via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10498
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 18:20:41 -0700
Tex via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10497
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 23:47:50 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10496
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 23:33:46 +0100
Harriet Riddle via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10495
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 17:41:51 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10494
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 21:16:41 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10493
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 14:35:45 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10492
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 17:11:12 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10491
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 00:29:41 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10490
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 21:15:17 +0100 (BST)
Julian Bradfield via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10489
On ideographs in the SMP, or, Why Plane 4 doesn't have a name yet
Wed, 27 May 2026 10:05:39 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10488
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 09:14:55 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10487
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 13:58:16 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10486
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 08:56:45 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10485
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 08:54:58 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10484
Feedback for L2/25-017 Addition of Miscellaneous Musical Symbols
Wed, 27 May 2026 09:42:53 +0000
Marius Spix via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10483
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 26 May 2026 18:46:33 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10482
Fwd: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 26 May 2026 18:41:52 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10481
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 26 May 2026 18:54:40 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10480
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 26 May 2026 15:32:30 -0700
Rebecca Bettencourt via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10479
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 00:31:31 +0200
Charlotte Eiffel Lilith Buff via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10478
Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 26 May 2026 13:04:54 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10477
Re: Proposing an Emoji Space character
Wed, 20 May 2026 17:54:27 +0200
Christoph Päper via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10476
Re: Proposing an Emoji Space character
Wed, 20 May 2026 17:32:16 +0200
Christoph Päper via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10475
Aw: Proposing an Emoji Space character
Wed, 20 May 2026 13:19:41 +0000
Marius Spix via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10474
Re: Proposing an Emoji Space character
Wed, 20 May 2026 11:34:28 +0200
Alexander Lange via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10473
Proposing an Emoji Space character
Wed, 20 May 2026 10:11:51 +0200
Christoph Päper via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10472
RE: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Thu, 07 May 2026 21:39:01 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10471
RE: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Thu, 7 May 2026 18:34:04 +0000
Peter Constable via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10470
RE: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Thu, 07 May 2026 18:02:57 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10469
RE: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Thu, 7 May 2026 15:23:22 +0000
Peter Constable via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10468
Re: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Wed, 06 May 2026 20:08:33 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10467
Re: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Wed, 6 May 2026 19:45:50 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10466
Re: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Wed, 06 May 2026 18:37:07 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10465
Re: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Wed, 6 May 2026 15:05:16 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10464
Re: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Mon, 4 May 2026 15:43:48 -0700
Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10463
Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Mon, 04 May 2026 19:24:06 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10462
Re: Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Sat, 18 Apr 2026 18:03:34 +0100
Harriet Riddle via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10461
Odp: Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:23:54 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10460
Pd: Missing legacy Arabic encoding
Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:46:48 +0200
"[email protected] via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10459
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Tue, 07 Apr 2026 09:42:17 +0200
stgiga via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10458
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:28:58 -0700
stgiga via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10457
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Sat, 4 Apr 2026 12:49:44 +0200
Giacomo Catenazzi via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10456
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Sat, 4 Apr 2026 03:31:53 -0400
Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10455
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 3 Apr 2026 23:18:23 -0700
Rebecca Bettencourt via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10454
RE: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Sat, 4 Apr 2026 04:19:10 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10453
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Sat, 4 Apr 2026 00:01:55 -0400
Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10452
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 3 Apr 2026 23:54:05 -0400
Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10451
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 3 Apr 2026 19:38:51 -0700
Rebecca Bettencourt via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10450
RE: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 3 Apr 2026 19:45:24 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10449
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 3 Apr 2026 12:46:07 +0200
Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10448
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 3 Apr 2026 01:05:18 -0700
Rebecca Bettencourt via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10447
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode
Fri, 03 Apr 2026 04:20:50 +0200
stgiga via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10446
Re: UAX #14: Allowing breaks before en dashes
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:21:07 +0200
Robin Leroy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10445
Re: UAX #14: Allowing breaks before en dashes
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:31:45 +0200
Daniel Buncic via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10444
Re: RE: UAX #14: Allowing breaks before en dashes
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:07:10 +0000
Léane GRASSER via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10443
Re: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode (was: Re: Are there [start] emoji [end] style codes?)
Mon, 30 Mar 2026 21:26:08 -0700
Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10442
RE: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode (was: Re: Are there [start] emoji [end] style codes?)
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 04:15:25 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10441
RE: UAX #14: Allowing breaks before en dashes
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 03:57:23 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10440
RE: Thoughts on upsizing Unicode (was: Re: Are there [start] emoji [end] style codes?)
Tue, 31 Mar 2026 03:47:15 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10439
Thoughts on upsizing Unicode (was: Re: Are there [start] emoji [end] style codes?)
Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:44:59 -0400
Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10438
UAX #14: Allowing breaks before en dashes
Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:54:43 +0000
Léane GRASSER via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10437
Re: Need help interpreting seemingly ambiguous text in UTS 39
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 15:09:57 -0700
Markus Scherer via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10436
Re: Are there [start] emoji [end] style codes?
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 02:39:37 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10435
Aw: Re: Scientific American: Open Source infected with malware from invisible Unicode characters
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:21:22 +0000
Marius Spix via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10434
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.