gmane.text.xml.schematron archive

176 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

Plan for alternative Open Standard text for Schematron
Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:03:48 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #178
[SPAM] Top quality most effective medications is the only thing you can find at our pharmacy!
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:07:34 +0600
Discount-Canadian-Meds <[email protected]> • #177
is this is?
Sun, 06 Aug 2006 22:36:26 +0000
"echo lynch" <[email protected]> • #175
RE: logic error in iso draft?
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:47:28 +0100
[email protected] • #173
Re: logic error in iso draft?
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:36:55 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #172
logic error in iso draft?
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:20:59 +0100
Brian Ewins <[email protected]> • #171
What are some examples of large-scale Schematron installations?
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Bertram Wooter <[email protected]> • #170
Re: Abstract Pattern Processing Model
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:44:26 +0100
Brian Ewins <[email protected]> • #169
Conformance testing, SVRL
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:35:50 +0100
Brian Ewins <[email protected]> • #168
ISO draft typos
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:03:47 +0100
Brian Ewins <[email protected]> • #167
Re: Re: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: [Schematron-love-in] Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:16:04 -0600
Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]> • #166
RE: Re: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: [Schematron-love-in] Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:13:10 -0600
Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]> • #165
Re: Conformance, Flag, Role/Subject
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:08:53 -0600
Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]> • #164
RE: Re: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: [Schematron-love-in] Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:34:48 +0100
[email protected] • #163
Re: Re: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: [Schematron-love-in] Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:25:44 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #162
RE: Re: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: [Schematron-love-in] Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:11:49 +0100
[email protected] • #161
Re: Extends element
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:27:35 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #160
Re: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: [Schematron-love-in] Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:24:36 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #159
Extends element
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:56:30 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #158
Abstract pattern processing model
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:56:45 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #157
RE: Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:46:20 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #156
Response to Daniel's review comments (Re: Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available)
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:23:13 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #155
RelaxNG schema omision of the flag attribute
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:36:51 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #154
ISO ns element
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:09:20 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #153
Re: ISO Specification and Schema
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:16:05 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #152
Confusion over Schematron 1.6 availability
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:06:58 -0600
Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]> • #151
RE: Important omission in ISO spec
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:54:22 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #150
Important omission in ISO spec
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:29:36 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #149
ISO Specification and Schema
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:18:11 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #148
RE: Conformance, Flag, Role/Subject
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:39:51 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #147
Conformance, Flag, Role/Subject
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:36:47 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #146
Schematron on MS's wish-list
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:26:33 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #145
RE: Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:24:03 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #144
Re: Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:51:13 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #143
RE: Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:51:07 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #142
RE: Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:26:03 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #141
Daniel Cazzulino weblog and Schematron.NET
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:42:06 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #140
RE: What engine does Schematron Validator use?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 15:16:35 +0200
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #139
RE: What engine does Schematron Validator us e?
Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:57:36 -0400
"Hunting, Sam (LNG-EWR)" <[email protected]> • #138
Re: What engine does Schematron Validator use?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:21:14 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #137
Re: What engine does Schematron Validator use?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:12:26 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #136
RE: What engine does Schematron Validator use?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 08:10:02 +0200
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #135
What engine does Schematron Validator use?
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:03:58 -0400
"Hunting, Sam (LNG-EWR)" <[email protected]> • #134
Re: Checking/Reporting on Many Nodes
Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:42:06 +0200
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #133
Committee Draft of ISO Schematron available
Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:53:39 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #132
Re: Checking/Reporting on Many Nodes
Tue, 01 Jun 2004 14:34:21 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #131
Checking/Reporting on Many Nodes
Mon, 31 May 2004 09:55:32 -0400
Noah Genner <[email protected]> • #130
COCOON SCHEMATRON implementation and large schematron file
Wed, 19 May 2004 20:11:43 +0200
"Dott. Giulio Buccini" <[email protected]> • #129
Xalan problem
Fri, 14 May 2004 12:39:51 +0200
Marco Puccetti <[email protected]> • #128
Xalan URI problem
Wed, 12 May 2004 18:50:54 +0200
Marco Puccetti <[email protected]> • #127
Re: schematron can output a well formatted data
Thu, 06 May 2004 17:45:33 +0100
Francis Norton <[email protected]> • #126
Re: schematron can output a well formatted data
Thu, 6 May 2004 17:15:13 +0200
Oliver Becker <[email protected]> • #125
Re: schematron can output a well formatted data
06 May 2004 10:38:19 +0100
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #124
Re: schematron can output a well formatted data
Thu, 6 May 2004 09:56:32 +0200
Oliver Becker <[email protected]> • #123
schematron can output a well formatted data
04 May 2004 18:11:44 +0100
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #122
RE: is this a job for schematron?
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 09:50:21 +0100
"Peter Aberline" <[email protected]> • #121
RE: is this a job for schematron?
Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:28:22 +0200
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #120
Re: is this a job for schematron?
Tue, 6 Apr 2004 17:22:57 +0200
Oliver Becker <[email protected]> • #119
RE: is this a job for schematron?
Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:12:00 -0400
"Snyders, John" <[email protected]> • #118
is this a job for schematron?
Tue, 6 Apr 2004 11:53:54 +0100
"Peter Aberline" <[email protected]> • #117
RE: newbe questions
Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:36:53 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #116
newbe questions
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:48:41 +0100
"Sebastian Fey" <[email protected]> • #115
RE: rule context="X" semantic?
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:01:15 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #114
Re: rule context="X" semantic?
04 Mar 2004 19:12:44 +0000
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #113
Re: rule context="X" semantic?
04 Mar 2004 16:36:27 +0000
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #112
Re: rule context="X" semantic?
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:13:42 +0100 (MET)
Oliver Becker <[email protected]> • #111
Re: rule context="X" semantic?
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:53:59 +0100 (MET)
Oliver Becker <[email protected]> • #110
rule context="X" semantic?
04 Mar 2004 15:47:53 +0000
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #109
Re: difference between these 2 rules...
03 Mar 2004 15:43:20 +0000
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #108
Re: difference between these 2 rules...
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:59:57 +0100 (MET)
Oliver Becker <[email protected]> • #107
get report/assert error line, element, context, ...?
03 Mar 2004 12:47:49 +0000
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #106
difference between these 2 rules...
03 Mar 2004 12:43:11 +0000
Pedro Salazar <[email protected]> • #105
RE: Schematron 1.6 new features
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:13 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #104
RE: Schematron 1.6 new features
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:33:09 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #103
Schematron 1.6 new features
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:29:01 -0300
"Daniel Cazzulino" <[email protected]> • #102
RE: XPath question
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:37:12 -0500
"Denny, Allison (LNG-BET)" <[email protected]> • #101
RE: diagnostics use.
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:44:38 -0000
[email protected] • #100
Re: Anyone seen this XSLT error before?
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:52:53 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #99
RE: diagnostics use.
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:35:37 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #98
RE: diagnostics use.
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:24:29 -0500
"Bradley, Martin" <[email protected]> • #97
RE: diagnostics use.
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:12:53 -0000
[email protected] • #96
RE: diagnostics use.
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:33:53 -0500
"Bradley, Martin" <[email protected]> • #95
diagnostics use.
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:54:10 -0000
[email protected] • #94
Anyone seen this XSLT error before?
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:33:44 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #93
RE: Finding Unique values in a set area??
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:44:26 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #92
RE: XPath question
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:19:59 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #91
RE: XPath question
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:09:47 -0500
"Denny, Allison (LNG-BET)" <[email protected]> • #90
Re: XPath question
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:56:40 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #89
XPath question
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:32:17 -0500
"Denny, Allison (LNG-BET)" <[email protected]> • #88
RE: Using Diagnostics with schematron-basic.xsl formatting.
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:05:56 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #87
Finding Unique values in a set area??
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:03:06 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #86
Introduction to Schematron
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:12:19 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #85
Re: Report on ISO Schematron progress
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Aron Roberts <[email protected]> • #84
Report on ISO Schematron progress
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:46:10 +1100
Rick Jelliffe <[email protected]> • #83
RE: Using Diagnostics with schematron-basic.xsl formatting.
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:07:11 +0100
"Edvard Robertsson" <[email protected]> • #82
Using Diagnostics with schematron-basic.xsl formatting.
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:42:08 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #81
Re: A couple of questions about using Schematron.
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:51:55 -0800
Mark Woon <[email protected]> • #80
RE: A couple of questions about using Schematron.
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:36:56 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #79
RE: A couple of questions about using Schematron.
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:06:02 +0100
"Boyle Owen" <[email protected]> • #78
A couple of questions about using Schematron.
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:04:02 -0700
"Chad Williamson" <[email protected]> • #77
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.